[3.5]
I picked this up because I'd read a review by Tom Holland and he'd really enjoyed it and been curious as to whether the book would have the same appeal to someone who, unlike Holland, had no interest in cricket. To which the answer is...sort of...up to a point. It's the story of growing up as a fan of the England cricket team in the 1990s, a time when, at least according to the author (although in the course of the book, she does come to question this), they were a truly awful, underperforming team. And of going back, the best part of a quarter century later, and talking the team's star players, to try to understand why they were so bad, if indeed they were. I certainly found it an easy enough read. But I wonder if it might have been more genuinely interesting if I knew something of the people in question. Names like Michael Atherton, Mark Ramprakash and Phil Tufnell sound dimly familiar, but before reading this I'm not sure I could have really told you anything about them.
And I get the sense that this was a book that assumed its reader either had a working knowledge of cricket, or would be happy to remain baffled by the sport's Brass Eye-esque terminology. At the end, I still had no idea what a leg-spinner was, what it meant to field in a silly-off position, let alone cow corner, or why it is that a sport that involves teams racking up three-figure scores of runs nonetheless so often ends in a draw. Probably if I had wanted to know about that, I should have been reading the Dummies' Guide to Cricket instead. Or as well. I have enough geeky tendencies that I imagine that in another life, I might easily have become a cricket fan, but as it is, my exposure to the sport never got beyond turning up a few times to the youth cricket club up the road from my house, finding I wasn't very good at it, and never going back.
So mostly what I ended up enjoying about this book, as someone not particularly interested in cricket were two things: The accounts of sportsmen who never quite achieved what they had wanted, and the very different ways that they seemed to explain away their failures years later, and
the author's account of what it was like to be a fan, and particularly a teenage fan
Of these, to my mind the most interesting were her account of meeting the oddly named Jack Russell, a man who came across as a genuine eccentric, who had become a professional artist after retiring and the book's closing encounter with John's childhood hero, Mike Atherton, who went some way to undermining the author's whole account of the England cricket team's supposed miserable failures during the 1990s, accusing the author of falling into the trap of "narrative fallacy."
Emma John's own account of the strange experience of being not just an obsessive sports fan, but an obsessive cricket fan at an all-girls school in the 1990s. Which must have been properly niche... The way that, over time, as she went from 14 year old obsessive to someone with a job and a flat and other such accoutrements of, to quote a line from popular song, the downhill slide into the unmagnificent lives of adults... it became gradually less important. At the beginning of the book, she remarks, of stumbling upon an old collection of memorabilia
"No, I felt sorry for myself now, glimpsing a grand passion, and knowing it was lost, that nothing in my life today could elicit anything like it. When was the last time that I cared about anything that deeply?
And then at the end
One thing that meeting my heroes has taught me is that while they might have been different from the people I imagined, my adolescent self was closer to them in spirit than I ever realised. They may have been then years older than me but the way that sport made them think and behave wasn't so very far removed from a teenager
Because it reminded me of my own memory of growing up obsessed, not with wickets, runs and the vagaries of the selectors' choices, but with who would come out on top in the battle between Senna, Prost and Mansell; Whether that year's Tyrrell, Lotus or Brabham would be the car to launch those venerable teams fallen on hard times back to the top of the sport, and why oh why the British Grand Prix had been moved from Brands Hatch to boring, flat Silverstone. Football fans have safety in numbers; there will always be others in the class who share your interest in the transfer deadline, who is in danger of relegation, and the mess that the national team are making of putting together a decent squad. But an interest in a more obscure sport, where you have only the specialist magazines and in John's case, her mum (in mine it was my dad) to get a sense of who was up and who was down, that takes a greater level of commitment.