So while I definitely do much appreciate both the historical and the religious background of David Wisniewski's Golem (and can in all ways very much understand how and why he won the Caldecott Medal for his expressively intense, colourful, evocative illustrations, for pictures that are bold, immediate, emotion-laden and very much both a mirror to and often even an expansion of the narrative, of the accompanying printed words), I also do not really and cannot really claim that I all that much enjoy Golem as a tale in and of itself (and in fact, it is actually more the visually stunning illustrations than the printed words which I find potentially too frightening and almost too intense in nature, although even with regard to the text, with regard to the author's presented narrative, there are issues and scenarios shown that I find potentially problematic and open to question and debate, and as such not really all that suitable or even approachable for children below the ages of seven or eight, and perhaps even nine or ten).
And as very much an adamant pacifist, David Wisniewski's message (or perhaps rather the culturally traditional message) that violence might well be necessary to combat violence or the threat of violence (via means of the super-strong and supernatural monster-like Golem), while to a point definitely understandable from a historical and realistic point of view (as the Jews of Prague were in peril, were indeed being relentlessly and with brutality and lies persecuted without mercy), this also leaves me personally rather majorly uncomfortable, even though I do in fact appreciate that Rabbi Loew does recognise that what he has created, that what he has called forth has caused, is causing much too much danger and destruction, all important and even necessary points for discussion, analysis and debate, but are these here themes not perhaps somewhat above and beyond the traditional picture book crowd (not to mention that the Golem, that Joseph, after he has served his purpose, is simply destroyed, even though life has become precious to him, a necessary act perhaps, but also sad, infuriating, inherently unfair and unjust in many ways).
But all that having been said, and my issues with the level of textual savagery and the possible over-intensiveness of the accompanying illustrations notwithstanding, I do highly recommend Golem and find especially David Wisniewski's informative supplemental note exceedingly well researched, informative, simply and utterly outstanding (although the hopeless academic in me would most definitely have enjoyed and also kind of missed a bibliography, a list of works cited and suggestions for further reading). And please do note that while I personally tend to think that Golem is not really all that suitable for children below at least the ages of seven or eight, that is simply my own feeling, my own reaction to the text/image combination, and I would NEVER in any way desire to impose this attitude on others (I just know on a personal level that if I had had Golem read to me as a younger child, I would more than likely have had nightmares and a great many potentially uncomfortable questions, such as for example, if the danger faced by the Jews of 16th century Prague was dire enough to call forth the Golem, why was the Golem then not called forth during the Holocaust).