What do you think?
Rate this book


416 pages, Paperback
First published August 27, 2015
Are these things essentially about sex? I suddenly wonder. No one as far as I know has ever suggested this before. Far from an anguished record of our brutal times, from death camp to nuclear bomb, are the flailings and gougings, the twisted limbs and half-obliterated heads a kind of paen to the further reaches of sadomaschochistic coupling? Is this an extended love song?
And I hope... I just hope that if it's a monster or something, or even if the thing doesn't have all what's called its five fingers and all its five toes you'll just do it in and get rid of it. Do you see? Do you see what I mean? Just do it in and get rid of it altogether.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b066v39q
From her corner stool, Muriel leans over and taps Francis sharply on the arm.There's been hints in other Bacon books, but the full flight Muriel has only been captured here, I feel. Also interesting was the way Sonia Orwell was portrayed - terminally unhappy, yet grudgingly accepting of Peppiatt, given time. Indeed, the description of Orwell lambasting Bacon after George's suicide was brilliant - an anger I'd never heard voiced in other texts. Between Belcher and Orwell, there's more depth given to the high and low times of Bacon's life, even if he's not, technically, the subject of the work.
'You're not a superstar,' she says rapidly. 'You're just a cunt, dear.'
'Well I suppose I am,' Francis concedes, almost gratefully. 'If you say so.'
'Who's a cunt now?' queries an adjacent drinker, swinging his grey face up from a long brood and pushing back a lank of lifeless hair.
'The big one's been calling him a superstar, dear,' Muriel explains kindly 'so I said he's not a superstar he's just a cunt. You didn't think I was talking about you you silly old ballock, did you, dear?'