Sartre İle Sartre Hakkında

by Jean-Paul Sartre, Yücel Göktürk (Translator)

Jean-Paul Sartre, düşünceleriyle eylemleri arasındaki tutarlılık açısından muhtemelen bütün modern tarihin en önde gelen düşünürüdür. Onun biyografisi ve eserleri hem yirminci yüzyıl deneyimlerinin tutanağı gibidir, hem de başkaları üzerinde derin etkileri olmuş etik bir öneridir. Sartre ile Sartre Hakkında'da 60'ların ikinci yarısıyla, 70'lerin ilk yarısında yapılmış üç söyleşi yer alıyor. New Left Review dergisi editörleriyle ve Simone de Beauvoir ile yapılmış ve çalışmalarındaki temel kaygıları, kadın mücadelesine ve dünya düzenindeki hiyerarşiye bakışını konu alan bu söyleşiler aradan geçen uzun zamana rağmen bugün hâlâ son derece güncel.

Genres: Philosophy, Nonfiction, France

96 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1966

About the author

Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre was a French philosopher, playwright, novelist, screenwriter, political activist, biographer, and literary critic, considered a leading figure in 20th-century French philosophy and Marxism. Sartre was one of the key figures in the philosophy of existentialism (and phenomenology). His work has influenced sociology, critical theory, post-colonial theory, and literary studies. He was awarded the 1964 Nobel Prize in Literature despite attempting to refuse it, saying that he always declined official honors and that "a writer should not allow himself to be turned into an institution."
Sartre held an open relationship with prominent feminist and fellow existentialist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir. Together, Sartre and de Beauvoir challenged the cultural and social assumptions and expectations of their upbringings, which they considered bourgeois, in both lifestyles and thought. The conflict between oppressive, spiritually destructive conformity (mauvaise foi, literally, 'bad faith') and an "authentic" way of "being" became the dominant theme of Sartre's early work, a theme embodied in his principal philosophical work Being and Nothingness (L'Être et le Néant, 1943). Sartre's introduction to his philosophy is his work Existentialism Is a Humanism (L'existentialisme est un humanisme, 1946), originally presented as a lecture.

Reviews

[Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs · Rating 5 out of 5]

Our petty world is a fatally fractured one. The light of Being, which once upon a time irradiated the enthusiasm of the Ancients, has now been fractured by the unending grubbiness of buying and selling into jarring, jagged fragments of meaninglessness. So say Sartre and Beauvoir.

They are partially right. Yet we have no choice but to live in this world. How we decide to live, says W.H. Auden, will decide the world's true meaning.

Leading a virtuous life leads back to the light.

But the world's meaning - which for Sartre and Beauvoir could be reckoned only through our own blood, sweat and tears (and they were right) - will seal the permanence of Being in its pristine purity, for us Christians.

An unattainable and unwanted summit for them.

Both balked adamantly at the word "virtue.' They found their truth in angry activism and bohemian sexuality. Christians don't buy that, thank heaven.

The way, truth and light remain undiluted for those of us who, using the same gritty determination as they did, have added Hope to the mix - a hope they refused - and we are now assured of eternal rest.

A blessed assurance, indeed!

I read this one in the early nineties; and my wife read it at the same time in the original French. Browned off by our draconian workspaces, we almost bought into it. Almost.

You know, despair is a lot like a toothache. It doesn't go away until you get the tooth yanked.

But Sartre and Beauvoir refused to yank out their despair through hope.

We refused NOT to hope.

So a caveat to those nowadays who moil in an identical slough of despond:

Despair KILLS.

But Hope is the golden Key of the Kingdom.

[Eda · Rating 5 out of 5]

Sartre🖤

[Jim · Rating 3 out of 5]

I have always been of two minds about French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. On one hand, he is the author of a number of philosophical works I see as being essentially unreadable. (That's why I downgraded Conversations with Jean-Paul Sartre to three stars: When the questions turn to philosophy, I sense a growing queasiness.) On the other hand, when he talks about literature or feminism (with no less than his consort Simone de Beauvoir) or politics, his thinking is more directly and cogently expressed.

This book consists of three interviews from the 1960s and 1970s. Subjects included feminism, American imperialism (during the time of the Viet Nam Conflict), Sartre's writing plans, and a large dollop at the beginning of philosophy using philosophical language that vaguely resembles human discourse.

If one skips through the turgidity at th beginning, this book has a lot to offer. I have always thought that Sartre's philosophy is best expressed in his novels such as Nausea and The Age of Reason; his plays, such as No Exit; and his autobiography The Words.

However great a literary figure he was, I could never forgive him for kissing Stalin's arse when he knew damned well what was going on in Russia at the time. I guess that's what philosophy can do to you: Hide the infamy behind a curtain of bland terminology.

[Ian · Rating 3 out of 5]

I have read a fair amount of Sartre, but mostly his earlier works such as No Exit, The Flies, Being and Nothingness, etc. In short, the main works that pre-date his embrace of Marxism and amphetamine addiction. These interviews were originally published between 1967 and 1975. Its jarring to read one of the post-war's great iconoclasts say "When I discovered the class struggle, this was a true discovery, in which I now believe totally, in the very form of the descriptions which Marx gave to it." Marxism seemed to be the call of sirens to so many intellectuals of his vintage. Its hard now to see how it held so many in thrall, not in the sense that Marxism is absurd or ridiculous, but rather how those intellectuals accepted the dogma (and the show trials). These interviews in themselves offer very little, but he does make a few clarifications to his earlier works, e.g., he accepts that there just might be a subconscious after all. His discussion with de Beauvoir about feminism is cringe-worthy. He may have been progressive for his time, but he still comes across as unapologetically sexist and condescending, engaging in a text book example of mansplaining. For completists only.

[solana · Rating 3 out of 5]

pertama, i don't really think I fathomed it wholly. kedua, mengenai feminisme aku rasa opininya sedikit biased, knowing the fact that they both are fiancées. tapi, kembali ke poin pertama, ak rasa lebih baik aku diam daripada didemo 😇🙏🏻

[M Eren Yasar · Rating 5 out of 5]

I really really enjoyed this one and it was so satisfying about my curiosities about Sartre's intellectual and private life.

In his first interview, he talked about his views on Freud, Psychoanalysis, Marxism, Flaubert, History of individuals, France University systems and Chinese Cultural Revolution. I just felt like i am interviewing with him. Great questions asked. Sartre's humble accepts in topics he ain't know so clearly made him more enjoyable for me. Also you can easily see how clever he is. His opinions and answers about Cultural Revolution, these are not questions that everyone can handle.

Second Interview with Castor, is about Women and Feminism (as you can expect) You can read Sartre's attitudes in his private life by directly from him and his closest spectator Castor. His approach to both sexes should be a worldwide example. Also his takes on women struggle is so accurate. I think women still can't find a synthesis between their gender and class struggles.

Third Interview is about Sartre's mission after Vietnam War. In Bertrand Russell Court he took judgeship. He said that it is important to figure out these war politics can be considered real crimes legally. You can see how his conscience and sense of justice acts in this one.

I found the book i looked for About him i guess...

[Julio The Fox · Rating 4 out of 5]

What becomes a legend the most? In the case of Jean-Paul Sartre asking him savagely critical questions on his attitude towards women, in his private and public life, how he feels about young people taking his books to the barricades ("Sartre is a funny fellow" one Parisian student mused, "too serious for politics") and what role intellectuals can and should play in revolutionary times. These candid interviews were conducted by acolytes but not sycophants, Perry Anderson to Simone De Beauvoir, Sartre's "Castor" and remain timely in any discussion of philosophy, art, and the last musings of the man De Gaulle called a modern Voltaire.

[Hakkı Sayın · Rating 3 out of 5]

Ortadaki feminizm kısmı hariç bence oldukça geride kalmış fikirler içeren bir kitap, okumaya degmeyebilir. O feminist kısım da sadece Simone'un sorulari için okunabilir. Camus'un Ikinci Cins'i ağır eleştirmiş olması beni çok şaşırttı ayrıca...

[Muhammet · Rating 3 out of 5]

''Freud'a dönersek , yine söylemem gerekir ki onu anlama kapasitesine sahip değildim, çünkü ardında sağlam bir kartezyen geleceği olan bir Fransızdım. Belli bir rasyonalizmle aşılanmıştım ve dolayısıyla bilinçdışı fikri beni şoka uğratmıştı.'' Sartre

[Gustavo Monsalve · Rating 4 out of 5]

Una lectura fácil sobre un personaje fascinante orgulloso de su ateísmo

[Ian · Rating 5 out of 5]

es war eine schöne bahnlektüre.

in den gesprächen geht es ums Lesen, Schreiben, Reisen und den Mond.

die dynamik in den gesprächen war zum teil etwas merkwürdig, es waren keine natürlichen gespräche, sondern sdb hat jps interviewt. aber ich habe einige eindrücke gewonnen von ihrem leben.
ich glaube es war hilfreich das ich vorher bereits die autobiografie "in den besten jahren" von sdb gelesen hab, da ich dadurch hintergrundwissen zu namen und ereignisse hatte und sie so besser einsortieren konnte.