In Inclination: A Critique of Rectitude,” Cavarero skilfully constructs a feminine and relational framework or ‘geometry’ for understanding the human experience to counter the masculine geometry of verticality that is assumed to be the central differentiating characteristic of Homo Erectus. Adriana Cavarero’s book is beautifully crafted. It curates ideas from philosophy, art, and biology to conjure up a vision of a maternal ethics that is more interested in inclination toward the other than in uprightness or self-contained integrity.
The book is moving, rigorous, and, expectedly, very Eurocentric. As is typical of the genre, it speaks in universal terms of a worldview that is based on a uniquely Western philosophical tradition. What Cavarero describes as Inclination has arguably been the dominant form of relationality and ethicality in communal societies throughout history. Such communal societies, mostly in the global South, have not been immune to the homogenising impact of globalisation. But Cavarero’s ‘inclination’ is very much their dominant form of ethicality and relationality in their history, philosophical traditions, and, often still, lived experience.