Audacious lack of substance
Dissapointing to the highest degree. I expected way more from a book by a designer that has worked on six continents consulting HP, Microsoft and Coca Cola.
If you didn't like Rubin's "The Creative Act: A Way of Being" or Wiest's "101 Essays That Will Change the Way You Think", you won't like this book either.
I understand the writer Alan Moore is dyslexic, which might explain the unpolished and staccato writing style, but it doesn’t justify the audacious lack of substance.
This book would've seriously benefitted from a collaboration with another writer to live up to it's premise: to explain why beauty is the key to everything. In the current state there is neither the explanation of what "beauty" actually is, or "everything" or "key".
The writing is devided not only in chapers, but in super short sections where the ideas and references are crammed, resembling more a diary entry or a X thread than a discussion. It feels highly fragmented, even if some ideas are sporadically picked up in later chapters.
One is expected to know what serenpidity is, why a mathematical formula can be beautiful, why design elevates and what fixed orthodoxies Galileo, Charles Darwin and Steve Jobs have been rubbing up against. The stories are not developed enough for an average reader, meaning not educated in at least some kind of design, to understand what he's trying to say.
The section headings are way too big for the content. I would expect something that is called "The roots of design" (the word "roots" sounding like a deep dive into history) to have a significantly higher amount of paragraphs than the two that are offered.
The design of the book itself is pleasing to the eye, but it missed the opportunity to show pictures by for example the mentioned photographer Sebastiao Salgado or of Shaker furniture and explain what makes it beautiful in detail, therefore giving the reader a formal language. Instead, he puts the thinking onto the reader by encouraging to "consider, how do we learn to see that which currently does not exist to us".
Moore mentions he loves to build a "pattern language" of how a company works, but doesn’t show any thought process.
In the appedix, there are suddenly some more detailed stories, which begs the question why it all comes so late.
Conclusion: Too much telling, too little showing.
I geniunely don't know who would benefit from this book.