What do you think?
Rate this book
Ptolemy I: King and Pharaoh of Egypt
When Rome defeated the forces of Antony and Cleopatra and annexed Egypt, the rule of the longest-lived of the Hellenistic dynasties and one of the most illustrious in Egyptian history came to an end. For nearly three hundred years, the Macedonian dynasty known as the Ptolemaic had controlled Egypt and its mixed population of Egyptians, Greeks, Macedonians, and Jews. The founder of this dynasty, Ptolemy I (367-283/2 BC), was a boyhood friend and eventually personal bodyguard of Alexander the Great, who fought alongside Alexander in the epic battles that toppled the Persian Empire, and brought about a Macedonian Empire stretching from Greece to India.
After Alexander's death, his senior staff carved up his vast empire, with Ptolemy gaining control of Egypt. There he built up his power base in Egypt, introduced administrative and economic reforms that made his family fabulously wealthy, and by extending Egypt's possessions overseas founded an Egyptian Empire. In addition to his political and military prowess, Ptolemy was an intellectual, who patronized the mathematician Euclid, wrote an important account of Alexander's campaign in Asia, and established the famous Library and Museum at Alexandria, which were the cultural heart of the entire Hellenistic Age. Ptolemy ruled Egypt until he died of natural causes in his early eighties.
Ian Worthington's Ptolemy I--the first full-length biography of its kind in English--traces the life of Ptolemy from his boyhood to his reign as king and pharaoh of Egypt. Throughout, he highlights the achievements that profoundly shaped both Egypt's history and that of the early Hellenistic world. He argues that Ptolemy was by far the greatest of Alexander's Successors, and that he was a conscious imperialist who even boldly attempted to seize Greece and Macedonia, and be a second Alexander.
After Alexander's death, his senior staff carved up his vast empire, with Ptolemy gaining control of Egypt. There he built up his power base in Egypt, introduced administrative and economic reforms that made his family fabulously wealthy, and by extending Egypt's possessions overseas founded an Egyptian Empire. In addition to his political and military prowess, Ptolemy was an intellectual, who patronized the mathematician Euclid, wrote an important account of Alexander's campaign in Asia, and established the famous Library and Museum at Alexandria, which were the cultural heart of the entire Hellenistic Age. Ptolemy ruled Egypt until he died of natural causes in his early eighties.
Ian Worthington's Ptolemy I--the first full-length biography of its kind in English--traces the life of Ptolemy from his boyhood to his reign as king and pharaoh of Egypt. Throughout, he highlights the achievements that profoundly shaped both Egypt's history and that of the early Hellenistic world. He argues that Ptolemy was by far the greatest of Alexander's Successors, and that he was a conscious imperialist who even boldly attempted to seize Greece and Macedonia, and be a second Alexander.
280 pages, Hardcover
Published November 1, 2016
About the author
Ian Worthington
67 books23 followersIan Worthington has been Professor of Ancient History at Macquarie University since 2017. Before then, he held an endowed chair as Curators' Distinguished Professor of History at the University of Missouri, USA. He hails from northern England, taking his B.A. at Hull and M.A. at Durham, before moving to Monash University to do his Ph.D.
Worthington specializes in Greek history and oratory. To date, he has written 9 sole-authored books, 1 co-authored book, edited 9 books, translated 2 volumes of the Greek orators (in the University of Texas Oratory of Classical Greece series), and written over 100 articles and essays on Greek history, oratory, epigraphy, and literature.
Worthington specializes in Greek history and oratory. To date, he has written 9 sole-authored books, 1 co-authored book, edited 9 books, translated 2 volumes of the Greek orators (in the University of Texas Oratory of Classical Greece series), and written over 100 articles and essays on Greek history, oratory, epigraphy, and literature.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
September 28, 2026
“it was impossible to displace him, since he seemed to be holding Egypt by virtue of his own prowess as if it were a prize of war.”
–Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, 18.39.5.
The extent of my knowledge of Ptolemy before reading this account of his life was confined to him being one of the Successors who “went native” and started a dynasty in Egypt that occasionally beefed with the Seleucids to their east, with the image I had of him in my mind forever being that of Anthony Hopkins's Ptolemy. Having finished Ian Worthington's portrayal of the man and his path to power, I can certainly say that the keyhole through which I saw him has certainly expanded, and that I gave him much, much less credit for his shrewdness, foresight and patience for playing the long game than he was due.
Ptolemy I Soter is an elusive man about whom little is known for certain and a sphinx-like figure whose motivations and personality remain hidden behind the fragmentary accounts of ancient historians. And yet despite these limitations the author provides a plausible reconstruction which, even if at times it felt too exhaustive and offered little in terms of firm historical certainty, still manages to piece together a usable account of the man.
There is no need to go into his rise from bodyguard to king, since his story is so intertwined with the events of the Successors' Wars that it needs no repetition here. Instead, it suffices to give a brief account of the author's main thesis below.
Concerning Ptolemy's vision for empire and the extent of his ambition, the author points out that "It has long been the consensus that Ptolemy pursued a policy of “defensive imperialism”— in other words, he was content to rule Egypt and involve himself in foreign affairs only when he felt his country was at risk— or even a separatist policy, by which he intended to secede from the greater empire and, left to his own devices, rule an independent Egypt." Though in this work he explicitly challenges these views, arguing that Ptolemy, far from isolating himself in Egypt, had the same imperialistic goals as the other Successors. This becomes clear as we chart the evolution of his ambitions, beginning with his rise to power, when he went from bodyguard to satrap of Egypt in a matter of days thanks to the Babylon settlement; his hijacking of Alexander’s corpse; the roles he played in all five Wars of the Successors; and especially his bid on Greece and Macedonia. Ptolemy, then, was anxious for power from the outset and we can see a progression from a desire to enjoy ruling power to the need to be viewed as an equal and then a better by the other Successors.
Given his experience fighting alongside them during Alexander's campaign, Ptolemy knew from the start that the Successors were bound to come into conflict with each other, with their clashing personalities, mutual hatred and suspicion of each other. Thus, by securing Egypt for himself he cleverly chose a country away from the major hotspots of that inevitable conflict, which offered him a high degree of safety from invasion until he was ready to extend his part of the empire. And extend he did. A personality trait that stands out from reading this analysis of the man is that he liked to play his cards close to his chest and that, far from being a mere opportunist who simply seized whatever opportunities happened to present themselves, Ptolemy had well-thought-out plans of his own and preferred to remain on the sidelines until fortune provided the right moment to act on them.
I think the best description of Ptolemy's foresight, whether in enlarging the role Alexandria was to play beyond what Alexander originally planned, in his machinations in foreign policy or even in his selection of an heir, comes from Edmund Richardson in his work on Alexander:
"Alexander could see across space more clearly than almost anyone else in history: he could surmise what might be over a horizon, how to navigate a difficult landscape, or where the weak spot of an enemy might be found. But he could not see across time: who would remain loyal, what would endure fifty years from now. Ptolemy did not have Alexander’s gift for seeing across space, but he had an astonishing ability to see across time, to glimpse the possibilities of the new reality that Alexander left behind. Alexander could think a hundred miles ahead. Ptolemy could think a hundred years ahead."
In terms of what he did, how he went about it and the stellar results of his actions, Worthington's verdict on Ptolemy is that he was the greatest of the Successors. The testimony to this greatness lies in what he ultimately accomplished: he brought Egypt out of being part of Asia and into the Greek world while turning it into a regional power, established an Egyptian naval presence in the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean and secured its approaches from the west and east while expanding Egyptian control over Cyrenaica, Cyprus, Rhodes, Coele-Syria, Phoenicia and the Cycladic Islands.
perhaps the greatest monument to his legacy is that he was the only one of the first generation of Alexander's Successors to die a natural death, while the Ptolemaic dynasty he founded became the longest-lived of all the Hellenistic dynasties.
Rating: 3.7/5.
–Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, 18.39.5.
The extent of my knowledge of Ptolemy before reading this account of his life was confined to him being one of the Successors who “went native” and started a dynasty in Egypt that occasionally beefed with the Seleucids to their east, with the image I had of him in my mind forever being that of Anthony Hopkins's Ptolemy. Having finished Ian Worthington's portrayal of the man and his path to power, I can certainly say that the keyhole through which I saw him has certainly expanded, and that I gave him much, much less credit for his shrewdness, foresight and patience for playing the long game than he was due.
Ptolemy I Soter is an elusive man about whom little is known for certain and a sphinx-like figure whose motivations and personality remain hidden behind the fragmentary accounts of ancient historians. And yet despite these limitations the author provides a plausible reconstruction which, even if at times it felt too exhaustive and offered little in terms of firm historical certainty, still manages to piece together a usable account of the man.
There is no need to go into his rise from bodyguard to king, since his story is so intertwined with the events of the Successors' Wars that it needs no repetition here. Instead, it suffices to give a brief account of the author's main thesis below.
Concerning Ptolemy's vision for empire and the extent of his ambition, the author points out that "It has long been the consensus that Ptolemy pursued a policy of “defensive imperialism”— in other words, he was content to rule Egypt and involve himself in foreign affairs only when he felt his country was at risk— or even a separatist policy, by which he intended to secede from the greater empire and, left to his own devices, rule an independent Egypt." Though in this work he explicitly challenges these views, arguing that Ptolemy, far from isolating himself in Egypt, had the same imperialistic goals as the other Successors. This becomes clear as we chart the evolution of his ambitions, beginning with his rise to power, when he went from bodyguard to satrap of Egypt in a matter of days thanks to the Babylon settlement; his hijacking of Alexander’s corpse; the roles he played in all five Wars of the Successors; and especially his bid on Greece and Macedonia. Ptolemy, then, was anxious for power from the outset and we can see a progression from a desire to enjoy ruling power to the need to be viewed as an equal and then a better by the other Successors.
Given his experience fighting alongside them during Alexander's campaign, Ptolemy knew from the start that the Successors were bound to come into conflict with each other, with their clashing personalities, mutual hatred and suspicion of each other. Thus, by securing Egypt for himself he cleverly chose a country away from the major hotspots of that inevitable conflict, which offered him a high degree of safety from invasion until he was ready to extend his part of the empire. And extend he did. A personality trait that stands out from reading this analysis of the man is that he liked to play his cards close to his chest and that, far from being a mere opportunist who simply seized whatever opportunities happened to present themselves, Ptolemy had well-thought-out plans of his own and preferred to remain on the sidelines until fortune provided the right moment to act on them.
I think the best description of Ptolemy's foresight, whether in enlarging the role Alexandria was to play beyond what Alexander originally planned, in his machinations in foreign policy or even in his selection of an heir, comes from Edmund Richardson in his work on Alexander:
"Alexander could see across space more clearly than almost anyone else in history: he could surmise what might be over a horizon, how to navigate a difficult landscape, or where the weak spot of an enemy might be found. But he could not see across time: who would remain loyal, what would endure fifty years from now. Ptolemy did not have Alexander’s gift for seeing across space, but he had an astonishing ability to see across time, to glimpse the possibilities of the new reality that Alexander left behind. Alexander could think a hundred miles ahead. Ptolemy could think a hundred years ahead."
In terms of what he did, how he went about it and the stellar results of his actions, Worthington's verdict on Ptolemy is that he was the greatest of the Successors. The testimony to this greatness lies in what he ultimately accomplished: he brought Egypt out of being part of Asia and into the Greek world while turning it into a regional power, established an Egyptian naval presence in the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean and secured its approaches from the west and east while expanding Egyptian control over Cyrenaica, Cyprus, Rhodes, Coele-Syria, Phoenicia and the Cycladic Islands.
perhaps the greatest monument to his legacy is that he was the only one of the first generation of Alexander's Successors to die a natural death, while the Ptolemaic dynasty he founded became the longest-lived of all the Hellenistic dynasties.
Rating: 3.7/5.
June 11, 2021
En ok genomgång av Ptolemaios Soter liv, med förbihållet att författaren konstaterar att det inte finns speciellt mycket källmaterial. Även de övriga diadokernas krig och personligheter beskrivs i relation till Ptolemaios. Fokus ligger jämnt fördelat över hans liv, vilket innebär att större delen av boken handlar om tiden i Alexanders skugga, både under erövringarna och efter hans död.
May 23, 2020
While I appreciated the exhaustive & detailed references supplied by Worthington, I found very little real information about the life of Ptolemy here. Of course, it is not the author's fault that there is such a dearth of surviving information. However, it did make me wonder about his decision to write a history about someone whom so little is actually known? All I had known about Ptolemy previous to reading this book has come from the reading I have done on the history of Alexander. Unfortunately, I don't feel this book provided me with anything additional to round that picture out. It surprised me to learn that so little information about his life has come down to us. He was one of a very small number to not only live through the Succession wars but to prosper & found a dynasty. Though so much was lost with the destruction of the Library at Alexandria...such a great loss. At any rate, that lack of information is probably the reason that much of the book was spent simply retelling of the history of Alexander. While this is a topic I am very interested in, I was underwhelmed. I have read quite a few histories of Alexander & already have my own bias as far as sources & interpretation. While I do believe Arrian to be one of the most important sources I also think he needs to be very discerningly sourced. Although Worthington absolutely does include the other usual sources, I found that his overall interpretation was almost identical to Arrian. He also seems to have taken a cue from Arrian by using Ptolemy himself as a source. Worthington did note his skepticism regarding this but I found my own to be a bit stronger. Anyway...I did not come away from this with any more real knowledge of Ptolemy's later life in Egypt than I started with. But again, props to the author for the awesome amount of research & references cited after each chapter. If a reader is newly interested in Alexander the Great (not already biased, like me:)) & has a particular interest in how that chaotic & pivotal period in history affected Egypt & spawned the beginning of the Ptolemaic Kingdom, this may be a great read.
July 30, 2024
This story is about the founder of the Ptolemaic dynasty in Egypt, a Macedonian by the name of Ptolemy. He accompanied Alexander the Great during the conquest of the Persian Empire, was one of his bodyguards, and would have stayed relatively obscure if it were not for Alexander’s death in 323 BC. His story is one of 'being in the right place, at the right time' but also of recognizing it and playing it strategically. I appreciate that, while much information is lacking about Ptolemy outright, the context of that time period is masterfully recounted.
January 11, 2023
It was an improper decision to author a book about Ptolemy I Soter. As the information about the latter's life is really scarce. Resultantly, the book exhausted me by a very long diffusion out of the main context. If you really want to write about a "Pharaoh of Egypt" -as the book entitled-Why we have a detailed description about the Campaigns of Alexander in India and Afghanistan??!!!
While just the penultimate and last chapters are talking about Egypt!!
While just the penultimate and last chapters are talking about Egypt!!
July 8, 2023
Ian Worthington's book on Ptolemy sheds light on the life and accomplishments of an influential historical figure. With meticulous research and engaging prose, Worthington present a comprehensive and nuanced portrait of a character that made a lasting impact on the ancient world.
February 22, 2024
for being about ptolemy an awful lot of this book focuses on alexander
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews