What do you think?
Rate this book
Studies in Rhetoric & Communication
Textual Curation: Authorship, Agency, and Technology in Wikipedia and the Chambers' Cyclopædia
Wikipedia is arguably the most famous collaboratively written text of our time, but few know that nearly three hundred years ago Ephraim Chambers proposed an encyclopedia written by a wide range of contributors--from illiterate craftspeople to titled gentry. Chambers wrote that incorporating information submitted by the public would considerably strengthen the second edition of his well-received Cyclopaedia, which relied on previously published information. In Textual Curation, Krista Kennedy examines the editing and production histories of the Cyclopaedia and Wikipedia, the ramifications of robot-written texts, and the issues of intellectual property theory and credit. Kennedy also documents the evolution of both encyclopedias as well as the participation of central players in discussions about the influence of technology and collaboration in early modern and contemporary culture.
Through this comparative study, based on extensive archival research and data-driven analysis, Kennedy illuminates the deeply situated nature of authorship, which is dependent on cultural approval and stable funding sources as much as it is on original genius and the ownership of intellectual property. Kennedy's work significantly revises long-held notions of authorial agency and autonomy, establishing the continuity of new writing projects such as wikis with longstanding authorial practices that she calls textual curation.
This study examines a wide range of texts that recompose accepted knowledge into reliable, complex reference works combining contributions of article text alongside less commonly considered elements such as metadata vocabularies, cross-indexing, and the development of print and digital interfaces. Comparison of analog and networked texts also lays bare the impact of technological developments, both in the composing process and in the topics that can practically be included in such a text. By examining the human and technological curators that support these encyclopedias as well as the discourses that surround them, Kennedy develops textual curation as a longstanding theory and process that offers a nuanced construction of authorship.
Through this comparative study, based on extensive archival research and data-driven analysis, Kennedy illuminates the deeply situated nature of authorship, which is dependent on cultural approval and stable funding sources as much as it is on original genius and the ownership of intellectual property. Kennedy's work significantly revises long-held notions of authorial agency and autonomy, establishing the continuity of new writing projects such as wikis with longstanding authorial practices that she calls textual curation.
This study examines a wide range of texts that recompose accepted knowledge into reliable, complex reference works combining contributions of article text alongside less commonly considered elements such as metadata vocabularies, cross-indexing, and the development of print and digital interfaces. Comparison of analog and networked texts also lays bare the impact of technological developments, both in the composing process and in the topics that can practically be included in such a text. By examining the human and technological curators that support these encyclopedias as well as the discourses that surround them, Kennedy develops textual curation as a longstanding theory and process that offers a nuanced construction of authorship.
192 pages, Hardcover
Published October 4, 2016
11 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
May 24, 2025
This is a solid book, that has its origins in a PhD. The title is excellent. The subtitle - less so.
There are some stubs of ideas that can be extended in future work. That is appropriate, considering the focus on Wikipedia.
Some interesting concepts are probed, including collaborative labour and distributive authorship. There is also a whisper of "the ontology of curation."
These fine concepts are important, and require deep and intricate attention. This book - like many doctorates - takes what could be two arbitrary interfaces and probes there alignment. There is interest in that comparison. But building a taxonomy or offering ontological interventions requires analytical depth beyond the case studies.
An intriguing book. Some provocative phrases. Strong work can emerge from it.
There are some stubs of ideas that can be extended in future work. That is appropriate, considering the focus on Wikipedia.
Some interesting concepts are probed, including collaborative labour and distributive authorship. There is also a whisper of "the ontology of curation."
These fine concepts are important, and require deep and intricate attention. This book - like many doctorates - takes what could be two arbitrary interfaces and probes there alignment. There is interest in that comparison. But building a taxonomy or offering ontological interventions requires analytical depth beyond the case studies.
An intriguing book. Some provocative phrases. Strong work can emerge from it.
Read
September 27, 2017it's about time I read this, and I'm very glad I did. so useful. inspiring. I'm gonna go combine a handful of this book's chapters with some other thoughts and literature and I am going to write awesome articles about public knowledge-making and human/non-human collaborations and multimedia collections of stuff and it'll be very fun.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews