Indeed, without doubt, Alcibiades' life was fascinating but here, Romilly is making it more fascinating than it actually was. Insisting on theclichès which she reproduces under specific subtitles such as "wealth", "beauty", "youth", "family and political allies" etc., by the time she begins to treat her subject, Alcibiades that is, the reader's mind is filled up with all the stereotypes that others- political opponents, philosophers, historians, rhetors, biographers and writers in general- have attributed to Alcibiades so to reflect the vices of imperial Athens in the end of 5th cent. Her narrative follows closely the facts and judgements of Thucydides- no wonder, she is an expert on Thucydides as she indulgently recalls- but she sometimes, feels necessary to add a bit of Plutach, Cornelius Nepo or other minor writers. Some extremely interesting remarks are made on the way; however, they are made en passant without further comments, analysis or citations. It would have been wonderful had she chosen to be a little more vigorous in her citations and in her details. The excuse that experts know where to find the data she omits, is shocking coming from a university professor and member of the French intellectual elite.