The Dialectics of Liberation

by David Cooper, Stokely Carmichael (Contributor), R.D. Laing (Contributor)

A revolutionary compilation of speeches which produced a political groundwork for many of the radical movements in the following decades

The now legendary Dialectics of Liberation congress, held in London in 1967, was a unique expression of the politics of dissent. Existential psychiatrists, Marxist intellectuals, anarchists, and political leaders met to discuss key social issues. Edited by David Cooper, The Dialectics of Liberation compiles interventions from congress contributors Stokely Carmichael, Herbert Marcuse, R. D. Laing, Paul Sweezy, and others, to explore the roots of social violence.

Against a backdrop of rising student frustration, racism, class inequality, and environmental degradation—a setting familiar to readers today—the conference aimed to create genuine revolutionary momentum by fusing ideology and action on the levels of the individual and of mass society. The Dialectics of Liberation captures the rise of a forceful style of political activity that came to characterize the following years.


From the Trade Paperback edition.

Genres: Philosophy, Politics, Nonfiction, Theory, Psychology

210 pages, Kindle Edition

First published January 1, 1968

About the author

Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.

Reviews

[Elena K. · Rating 4 out of 5]

Not all of the addresses aged well (the Congress was held in July 1967) but a few are enduring, powerful, important- in particular: "Black Power" by Stokely Carmichael and "Liberation from the Affluent Society" by Herbert Marcuse

[Jim · Rating 4 out of 5]

An eclectic gathering of essayists make this collection of speeches a pleasure to read. And while their specific fields are not necessarily commonly associated, the message unites them. Revolutionary change is required to overthrow and replace the Capitalist-State system currently dominating, oppressing, and destroying the planet for its human inhabitants. Strange - to those not paying attention maybe - that this book was published in 1968. Nearly all its arguments still hold true, much the the increasing sadness of the overwhelming majority of humankind. While not finding much of profound significance here, I am 100% in line with their goal. I particularly loved Carmichael's selection. Unrepentant, militant, angry, and intelligent, just like the man who wrote it.

[Soph Nova · Rating 4 out of 5]

I should have read a more in-depth description of the content of this book before diving in - I didn't realize it would be so focused on a dialectical critique of psychology/psychiatry. That being said, it's a fascinating snapshot of the way that theory and practice were relating to each other in that specific historical moment - and the intense theory beforehand makes Stokely Carmichael's speech snap into relief that much more fiercely.

[Theodoros Vassiliadis · Rating 4 out of 5]

Modest to militant lectures that took place in the London conference on liberation - social and mental - by an interesting gamut of thinkers and that bear and analyze the timely spirit of the age , namely wars, imperialist thirst , corporate government.
Unfolding has vigour and a variegated repertoire. It's a worth reading that renders fruits w/ no prerequisites and reveals the human and political condition in the end of the 60's

[Jess · Rating 3 out of 5]

These (mostly) academics spent two weeks at a conference talking about liberation and labor and self-determination, yet not one of them acknowledged those they left at home taking care of the children and pets etc. Amazing.

But anyway, I'll be looking for more from Laing, Goldmann, Marcuse, and Carmichael/Ture.

[Steven R]

Very of its time. Best pieces in it were the Laing and the Marcuse. Stokely was pretty good too though, like the rest of it, quite dated. The Goodman piece was absolute dogshit, just truly horrendous.

[Tawny · Rating 3 out of 5]

Kinda feel like they put Stokely Carmichael and Herbert Marcuse towards the back in this so that you have to read some pretty boring stuff to get to them. Enjoyed overall.

[Janet]

Wild!

[Eurethius Péllitièr · Rating 5 out of 5]

With definitely some deep and confusing discussions, however many of the essays produced excellent points, and were presented brilliantly despite not always agreeing with each other

[Jonathan]

Delicious dialectic. Not to be confused with devious dianetics.