I think my team needs to read this book. Not so much because our meetings suck per se, but there's some nice little points about growth, being heard, transparency, and accountability that all would have a place to land (though if I could just ensure fertile ground for those points...).
Even some of the meeting types that didn't sound relevant to my academic (not corporate) setting still offered some ideas that resonated, at least personally. E.g. I don't do budgets but I'd like to know more about what's going on there, so I appreciated the author's calls for transparency. The longer-term strategy meetings also seem like an excellent call -- let's see, minus three months...May/June should be ours. Wonder if I can get this book adopted to that end (and others) by that time.
The only time I'm skeptical of, both on a personal and logistics level, is the twice-daily huddle. Really? And just not feasible for us as a department with our schedules and obligations that all vary from day-to-day and week-to-week. Maybe if just the FT librarians huddle, but there's only 2-3 of us, and we're tight communication-wise, sooooo. But that's fine. Well, and the weekly(?) one-on-one check-ins, which could be 30-60 min a pop. I appreciate the concept (and even more his encouragement to make them sacrosanct in your schedule and not skipped or deferred), but yow, that's a lot. Still, take a concept, alter to fit.
I also wish a few more strategies were provided for getting the quiet members of a meeting to contribute, especially as a meeting structure kind of strategy and not just "leader, shut up and let the group talk first so your authority doesn't smother." We've got people who maybe agree with what's being said so don't feel inclined to speak up with even an "agreed" (maybe head-nodding, though). We've got people who are just timid and don't like a spotlight, even in our small and familiar group, and surely there's alternatives to forever saying "person, what do you think?" But having clear agendas and outcomes pre-meeting may help with that -- it's certainly a conclusion we eventually realized for ourselves (being a horde of introverts) but now need to steer our leader towards.
Skipping/cancelling meetings is referred to as a "slippery slope," but no more exploration was given. I agree with that... but would like more commentary to chew on, especially in contrast to meeting advice to just cancel if there's nothing for the agenda rather than waste everyone's time. (And in contrast to the encouragement for teams to be able to run meetings even if the boss or others can't attend.) Obviously an examination of why regular meetings regularly have unfulfilled agendas is an issue the team needs to solve, and maybe that's a dysfunction beyond the scope of this book. There's deeper roots to some issues in my world for which the meetings are just a symptom.
So, as business books go... This one did not, to my surprise, suck.