It took me a long time to read this book, but finally, I can move on. However, I would like to first write a review. I do not normally write reviews in English but I thought I could not keep my mouth shut regarding the content of The Mind-Gut Connection, from Emeran Mayer.
The author and, therefore, his book, seem untrustworthy to me. Mayer seems not to be a person in the search for answers, in the search for the truth, but rather a person with already established beliefs who is using some studies on his convenience to justify those beliefs. Even though at the end of the book he states that you can "develop your own personalized diet within the general constraints of the "ground rules" of high-diversity food", he still says that the best way to do this is mainly from plant sources. But what if those "ground rules" need to be questioned? Mayer even suggests following the recommended portions from food labels. Why do we have to do something that has been decided by a few for a whole population? One size does not fit all, right? In general, I notice a big lack of nuance in this book, which makes me feel very suspicious, for example, when it comes to the author's fixation on animal fat as something bad to all of us.
I'd like to highlight other points as well:
- The author says that the Mediterranean diet consists mainly of veggies. I am Mediterranean and that's just not true. Also, which Mediterranean diet is he talking about? The Spanish one, or which one? At least in my country of origin, Spain, we love animal fat and meat, overall. Vegetables are more like an optional choice. We eat lots of legumes, though.
- The author mentions the Seven Countries Study (page 255). Come on, is that study worth to be referenced nowadays? That made me think of this author as someone with a clear lack of awareness and criticism.
- The book has a preachy language and does not offer, as mentioned before, nuanced information, which I believe is important in an area that's sort of new in science such as the brain-gut connection.
- The author is extremely subjective throughout the book, which I guess it's good for a blogger that narrates a personal experience but probably not for a doctor that tries to bring science to a wider audience. One example, from page 247, relating to the generalized fear of gluten, goes on to say: "I have yet to meet a French or Italian person who would give up the consumption of delicious fresh-baked crispy baguettes, the soft and moist ciabatta bread, or the savory pasta dishes for the uncertain benefits of freeing themselves from common ailments that have existed since long before the recent surge in vital gluten." I am not going to discuss if gluten is good or bad but rather a subjacent idea: is this author promoting the consumption of this kind of food by using an appealing language? To me, this quote means something like "come on, go on eating baguettes, they are delicious. Instant gratification, yay! Let's not look further than that." Animal fat is bad, doctor Mayer, but baguettes and ciabattas are things that we should rather not give up. Let's eat pasta and bread, then. I guess that's healthier than a steak. W.h.a.t.e.v.e.r.
- This author seems to contradict himself often, but probably this is because he does not elaborate on many of his statements. He does not quote nor references properly. At the end of the book, the author has a page with bibliography. However, and throughout the text, it is very difficult to track where his affirmations come from. This makes the whole book untrustworthy. A patter that I saw often in The Mind-Gut Connection was: Mayer goes on to mention, maybe, one study (without quotations or references) and then he makes a case out of that single study or about the findings of a certain investigation group. I can also do that: find a study that justifies my own beliefs, since you can find many studies à la carte.
- Lack of clarity. The author goes on to criticize a high-fat diet but he does not explain what is this diet about. He does not elaborate on that, so I guess we have to figure out ourselves. On some pages, it seems to be a diet like the North American diet, where sugary products are consumed next to high-fat ones, but sometimes it seems to be a diet rich in animal fat where it is no clear the role of sugar. What is this high-fat diet? What constitutes a high-fat diet and why is it bad? Is it bad on its own or in combination with other things? Is it, maybe, a burger from McDonald's or is it a pork chop from your local farm served with homemade mayonnaise? Is it an avocado salad with Brazil nuts or is it a bucket of chicken wings from the KFC with an extra of fries?
There are some positive aspects in this book, though. That's why I give it two stars:
- The author dares to speak about something that's not so well known such as the brain-gut connection, which is important to take into account regarding our lifestyle habits.
- He remarks on how unhealthy the standard American diet is, which can help people from America search for other alternatives.
- The author informs that current health care systems focus on treating symptoms rather than identifying the underlying causes of disease. Interestingly, Mayer brings that to our awareness so we can be more proactive and critical about our health.
- Mayer reflects on how bad stress is for our overall health, especially to the health of our brain-gut axis. I believe the author mentioning this also brings awareness to the hazardous effects of stress on our overall health.
I hope this review helps.