This book really confused me. Perhaps I should have read the description more carefully, but it sounded like a "chick lit" novel. Yes, the description mentions a malicious stalker, but this line does not give the reader any hint at the darkness and violence in the story.
The story centers around the wealthy Kent family. Patriarch Jack has been brought low through bad investments and scandal. He is "saved" from complete ruin because he devious second wife Innocence stole part of his company from him. Their vapid daughter Emily is a horny, spoiled teenager, who gets pregnant after seducing the son of a rich Scottish earl. Jack's adopted daughter from his first marriage, Claudia, has no use for the family fortune, making her way in the world as a reporter. The family is seriously dysfunctional and messed up, even without the presence of a "malicious stalker."
What does the stalker add to the tale? A bomb and several murders of people connected to the family. Seriously? Yes, seriously. The story is way more violent, dark and sinister than the front cover or the description let on. The "malicious stalker" is indeed the heart of the story, although you don't realize it until a you're 120 pages in.
The strong point for the novel is its organization. The "malicious stalker" is not introduced until the second quarter of the novel and you don't realize he has been introduced until later. Instead the evil one shows up in "Book Two" as an extra character with seemingly little connection to the rest of the story. Yet, the violence glimpsed in the snippets of his story hint at the overall violence to come.
Overall, I really did not know what to make of this novel. I felt misinformed as to its story and thus confused when it went in a dark direction. "Chick lit" it is not. For that reason alone, the title and cover image need to be changed to more accurately reflect the "malicious" content.