Gorgeous photos.
There are frequent references to the glory of specific animals, always misattributed.
Not a record of evolution. It just points out unique aspects of each animal and says:
"Look what evolved" or "this is natural selection". There's postulation about the ancestors of animals, but even then often they're not sure and there is no kind of record.
It attempts to demonstrate natural selection, which isn't disputed (though it sets that up early as a straw man suggesting people believe animals have been unaltered since the flood).
No record of macroevolution is given.
Sometimes it shows the opposite: e.g. the genes are there but natural selection caused prosperity amongst cave fish with smaller eyes and then no eyes, rather than any information growth.