The book 'Horrid Henry' is a collection of four short stories which focus on the daily events of the classic anti-hero protagonist, Horrid Henry. A man who's very identity is described even before his name is given to us. He is not the only character to be named with an overly-simplified, alliterated characteristic; brothers, arch-nemeses and friends alike are all named like this: Perfect Peter, Moody Margaret, Rude Ralph etc. Truly, from names alone we understand that simplified identity will be the core difficulty our protagonist will have to face in his oncoming misadventures.
Synopsis of the first (and only story I've read so far):
'Horrid Henry's Perfect Day' harks back to a more 'Cowboy Western' plot line; as we know from his name, Henry is far from good. We see this in grizzly detail at the beginning of Simon's tale. We see how carelessly he wrecks his family home, how utterly amoral our protagonist is. We have our 'Black-Hat, if you will.
All this is juxtaposed with Perfect Peter, the 'White-Hat' of our story. he cares for his surroundings, he does not squander his home's supply of vegetables and is rewarded by their mother with cake, But no. He does not want recognition for his actions, Peter does not desire cake. He merely wants to do good.
However, the colour of a man's hat and the lines that make up morality are muddled and blurred when Henry, the once-Cain to Peter's Abel, sees his brother's success and tries to emulate it. Out of innocent curiosity, he strives to experience his brother's defining feature, 'Perfection.'
As the fallen Henry strives to recompense for his transgressions against his own blood, and while his mother welcomes this newer, more godly Henry with open arms, his brother watches from above in disbelief. He knew what kind of man his brother once was, he knows of his trickery, his capability for deceit, his horrible nature.
Later that same day, Henry is helping at the homestead with his mother, setting the table and altogether taking the jobs of his younger brother. Peter cries out at his loss of purpose within his home, but it falls on deaf ears. Peter is threatened now, his place at his mother's side is no longer safe at the hands of what he believes to be a deceiver. So he goads him.
All throughout the night, Peter tempts Henry, aiming to spark the fires of his once great and cavernous furnace of anger but the pit is empty. Henry does not respond. Instead he holds peace to his brother, trying to show him he is a changed man, but Peter does not believe him. No, he cannot. For in Peter's eyes only Peter is Perfect, and if one is Perfect there must be another who is horrible.
Unwittingly, Peter had turned the tables of morality back on himself, letting the horrible fires that once plagued his brother settle onto him. Their defining characteristics had been swapped and in the storm of passion that was raging through Peter, their Mother was hurt by him. Peter is cast out of the dining room.
At that moment, all Horrible fire is banished from him and he is left empty and forgotten. However, it merely returns to its original vessel. Henry's mirth at the banishment of his brother bubbles through for their mother to see. This feature is no longer welcome there and he too was banished to his room, along with his brother.
Review:
This was truly a harrowing tale of nigh-biblical proportions. Simon honestly grapples with the idea of redemption and to what extent a person is able to forgive. With echoes to genesis, her modern interpretation of the bible tale is far more fitting for a contemporary audience of today, not to mention the metaphor of the feminine God found in the Mother character of the two children. She was all loving, yet all powerful and fair.
Honestly, if this story didn't have such hauntingly true themes of brotherhood and repentance, I would undoubtedly read it to my child. However, I feel it better to wait a number of years before i show it to him or merely let him find this himself.