International lawyer Philippe Sands has a unique insider's view of the elites who govern our lives. His sensational revelations in Lawless World changed the political agenda overnight, forcing Tony Blair to publish damning mterial that he'd tried to hide.
Now, in this updated edition with a shocking new chapter, you can get the full story of how the US and UK governments are riding roughshod over international agreements on human rights, war, torture and the environment - the very laws they put in place. Here sands looks at why global rules matter for all of us. And he powerfully makes the case for preserving them ... before justice becomes history.
Philippe Sands an Anglo-French lawyer and writer. He is Professor of Law at University College London and a practicing barrister at Matrix Chambers. He has been involved in many important cases, including Pinochet, Congo, Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Iraq, Guantanamo and the Yazadis. His books include Lawless World and Torture Team. He is a frequent contributor to the Financial Times, Guardian, New York Review of Books and Vanity Fair, makes regular appearances on radio and television, and serves on the boards of English PEN and the Hay Festival.
He's mad ASF. This book serves as a short history of international law -- from the Atlantic Charter to the 1984 Convention on Torture to NAFTA and the WTO -- as well as a scathing critique of how the Bush and Blair administrations undermined international law in their haste to go to war in Iraq. This is not an objective legal history of the war in Iraq, nor does it claim to be. Sands argues well that the damage done by Bush in his haste to invade, detain, and torture has had and will have negative consequences for everyone, including the US itself. It's Petard Hoisting Szn.
Would love to see either an updated book now that we are twenty plus years past 9/11, or another Sands book on the state of international law today. What was COVIDs impact? How has China been as a participant in international law (in this book, China is still barely an emerging player)?
This is one of the foremost International Law authors. But the vantage point of his critique is so -- how shall i say it -- shrill, condescending, uncritical, unhistorical, and limited. Does he not understand that his meta position is identical to those he would criticize.
the neo-Kantians -- those who would re-make the world according to some parochial version of universalism -- are the most dangerous of all. In my opinion, anyway. Sands is an excellent example of someone who cluelessness is what the emperor's clothes are made of.
An excellent account of what happened before, during and after the war in Iraq. An overview of how international law, in its imperfection, benefits the world.
A comprehensive, erudite, critical, and inspiring overview of PIL that is very accessible to non-lawyers. A little outdated now but a great guide of the most important PIL events circa and pre 2006.
The author clearly values international law and makes a strong case for it, whilst exploding the hypocrisy pertaining to the Bush and Blair administration. It is interesting to read now, because the consequences of undermining international law can be, arguably, observed in the behaviour of Russia regarding Georgia and Ukraine.
On the other hand, the book is a little dry at times, however, it is accessible. I recommend it for people who are concerned with the role of the state, the movement towards unilateralism, and those concerned with the current discussion about sovereignty and human rights in the UK and Europe. This is not light reading, so make sure you have a strong cup of coffee in hand.
very topical how after WW2 America & Britain helped set up international law to safeguard society across the world after coming through such a horrendous war with the many dead & casualties Now, these laws are being pulled apart & abused by the very same lawmakers They are now fast becoming law breakers as they brutally pull apart these intended safeguards for their own ends wherever that may be very engrossing well written book by a specialist in the field
Several reviews state this book is dry. I don't really agree. Maybe a few sections were a bit dry, but overall I found the book pretty easy to read (except the chapters on trade and investing which I know hardly anything about). Interesting reading this book a decade after it was published and looking back on all the crap the Bush administration pulled.
Dense at times, but extensively documented and researched. A comprehensive summary of the history of international law and how the USA ignores and contravenes it.