I awaited this book with so much excitement based on the author's previous great books but upon finishing it I must say it fails short of the epic analysis done in the author's previous books "Currency Wars" and even "The Death of Money". It's probably not a bad book for somebody who didn't read the others, but for me it felt too much of the same, too few new ideas, too much recap and 2x as much personal stories and trivial descriptions of events from the author's life contacts. They're interesting and maybe add authority, but not as valuable compared to the solid analysis, reasoning and predictions based on new data that I was hoping for.
I guess it's meant to be/is more of an introduction to a new reader, which i guess makes sense, though I still think it's not as solid an introduction. That being said I think the book is full of very interesting things, a lot of thinking and solid reasoning and some very useful and insightful perspective lenses for viewing these decades of history.
Random memories and thoughts on it:
- again nice argumentation on how the author's statements are not radical but rather historically common on longer timescales, such as the periodic reforming of the international world order, particularly a currency one
- there's a lot of talk about complexity theory, which i think is mostly right both in essence and in nice examples, howeeeever it feels overdone and used too much in a religious ways instead of more complex reasonings/maybe data that he can't afford to release so he's trying to talk around the edges?
- a very insightful presentation of the interest groups of those in power and how they differ sometimes from that of those who pay the taxes, and thus the rational divergence in goals and approaches
- some interesting insights as to what seem likely actions in the next crisis, in particular in the freezing of assets department for purposes of extra taxation/confiscation based on ruling needs. Here too, though one might be tempted to dismiss the author as a conspiracy theorist one finds the same issues being treated in very serious circles (even public papers: IMF, FED, ECB, BIS and the politics around them including the media communication strategy to prepare the masses for these events), though of course on a different tone as rational solutions to guiding the masses into desired outcomes.
- some more interesting insights about world geopolitics.
- interesting historical moment stories
- nice explanations of the incentives and operation processes of financial institutions, banks, and governmental finance departments
- As with the past couple of books i felt the author might've lost some spine in presenting some issues, maybe he was too direct on some of them, so in this book he seemed to me to somewhat backtrack on some issues or take a more politically correct modern position. Also more of the previous american nationalistic perspective. I'm curious how he views the new president's actions, not that that really matters in the big scope of the more important things, still, they might create the context for the steps of a world turning from a cooperation to a competition game theory approach
- nice discussions about old money vs new money perspectives and approaches
- has some controversial position on classical economics, seems persuasive for a few moments but at times his arguments felt fishy and slippery, unlike some of the classical ones he was opposing.
- i was surprised by his perspectives on old roman dictatorship and present day America, the tension between police confiscations as sources of revenue and taxes on the poor/particularly the black population
- i found particularly interesting his discussion based on Joseph Schumpeter's historical approach in arguing that indeed capitalism does fall to socialism, but not because it's good but because it creates the abundance and wealth that then invites the wasteful destruction, interesting to see that idea picked up in modern times and based on contemporary events, all fitting so well in the author's thesis of the elite's interests and their alliance with the popular masses to secure their continued wealth and prosperity by destroying the middle class. This makes historical sense given the ancient persistent examples of kings and peasants forming a killer alliance to engulf those between, something indeed noticeable historically in the past decades with the middle class being taxed into either poverty except for those who manage to rise into the favor of the state. Also On this transition he touches an idea I had only heard from Mises before, that of the pretty much identity and continuity between leftist and fascist ideas due to both similarity of goals and necessities, something indeed often overlooked today in the popular left-right discussions that ignore the necessities of action and the logical conclusions of trains of thought when applied to real world people.
Overall I found it an interesting book with a tons of interesting stuff, just not as good as "Currency Wars" or at least not having in 2016-2017 as much of a knowledge data package based on the new events since then as I was hoping for, which left me a bit disappointed although overall it was a better than average book.