Despite some good info and great lines, the book is incomplete and DEFINITELY needs a proper editing work.
The section of "RENAISSANCE WOMAN: St. Theresa of Avila" in Chapter 4 is a terrible, terrible work. Just terrible. What she represented was the opposite of Renaissance, and I'd cross out this section if I were the author.
I'm afraid to say that the writer is found unqualified for the subject.
It is weird that I've read many books of the same author, and some of them were really good. Why is this one found so messy? Was this one of his earliest works?
Anyways, let's start the step-by-step e-valu'ation of the work.
(Kindle Ed. Introduction)
The Middle Ages saw Europe forge a new identity as a collection of individual nations, no longer part of the fallen Roman Empire, that developed their own ethnic character.
The book opens with a typo: ...their own ethnic characters.
(Kindle Ed. Introduction)
During the Middle Ages, the nations of Europe forged new identities that moved them away from the lost glory of the Roman Empire into their own ethnicity...
The first and second paragraphs of the "Entr-/ Intr-o-duct'ion" are redundant...sigh. What, is this a joke? The very opening of the whole book is all messed up!
(Kindle Ed. Introduction)
...But the dutiful Christians of the Middle Ages who sought orthodoxy and for the most part obeyed the papal rules underwent a change when the Middle Ages ended...
Not exactly "when it ended," so "as the Middle Ages ended" is appropriate for this line.
I see that the author tried to sound more eloquent in the opening, but he should've revised it carefully as the lines sound kind of clumsy. I'm afraid it isn't really a good Introduction after all.
Although the author's intention is felt, the lines are not really clear to read, and they do need an editing work.
In addition, I recommend the author to combine the Introduction and Chapter 1 together as new and "complete" Introduction of the book.
Again, the book is not complete. First of all, insert the page numbers!
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 1)
Once upon a time, Rome was an Empire and the lands it contained were regional entities which had pre-imperial pasts followed by inclusion within the Empire, a status generally achieved by the power of the Roman legions but which was eventually accepted by the subject nations...
What a messy paragraph...edit it starting with a "comma" between "Rome was an Empire" and "and the lands it contained were..."
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 1)
...Then Rome fell and the nations, untethered to a central authority, were obliged to discern for themselves who they were as part of the Europe.
A comma after fell! And what's "the" Europe?
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
For most of Europe, the cities were important, but subordinate to the countries in which they were located. Italy reversed that process with independent city-states...
What a mess!
Seriously, I can write it better:
In "most" of Europe, cities were important while, no matter how wealthy and strong they were, they belonged to their respective countries. However, it was different in modern-day Italy as wealthy "independent" city-states flourished in the land...
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
Wealth was changing the demographic of power. The bankers were not aristocrats, but their acquisition of wealth meant that wealth was being redistributed. From a time when power was based on the ownership of land by the wellborn, commercial advances saw wealth shift to people who did not have a pedigree of birth. The bankers had the money and the nobility needed it. The nobles were not accustomed to having to preserve their acquisitions or to acquire more, and they relied on banking loans to fund their wars and their lifestyles. By the end of the 15th century, the nobles who had defaulted on their loans had lost their wealth to the commercial powers. A new power structure was forming.
A diamond in the rough unless it was copied from another source. If these lines were authentic, they would save the book with minimum 3 stars as the value of the book's been found anyway, but the general quality of this book makes the readers wonder with a doubt about some of these fine lines found here and there.
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
Approximately one-fourth to one-third of the population was poor. There were also slaves during this time, the first attempt in post-classical Europe to consider slavery as an economic option. Merchants and tradespeople—small businessmen in today’s lexicon—were the next layer of social strata, beneath the bankers who were beginning to emerge as power brokers because of their control of wealth and their support of capitalism. On the top of the social structure were the traditional nobility class and the merchant class that dominated the cities.
To keep slavery under the new idea of "Humanism," they would in-vent another idea of dehumanizing the African people'/ popul'ace. The way they were shipped to other lands, these slaves were not like the "still-Human" properties of Greek and Roman times, but simple packages or animals. The color-based ethnic demography was born with this inhumane, new idea that di-vided the White and the Black, the Humans and the non-Humans.
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
The brilliant minds of the Renaissance rediscovered their ancient roots and with the rebirth of interest in Greek and Roman learning, the Renaissance, rooting itself in its lost heritage, built a new philosophy which bypassed the ecclesiastical formula of asceticism to discover worldly pleasures: beauty and the intellect became the new lodestars of a population that looked to its own talents and awareness to define the world.
We can find the reason of this change in the Church itself with the failed Crusade, incompetence facing the Mongol and Black Death "invasions." I mean even the clergy men were killed and collapsed right before their people begging for their help. The book lacks this en-/ in-form'ation.
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
Florence: The Incubator of the Renaissance
Why would the author place this subtitle here "within" the lines, eh? Irregular form'at: Revise the work!
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
It’s fitting that an Italian city should be credited as the birthplace of the Renaissance. Rome at its height had sponsored Europe’s safety and prosperity until the mounting success of barbarian invasions by the Vandals, Goths, Ostrogoths, etc. so weakened the Empire that by 476, when the Emperor Romulus Augustulus was deposed and Odoacer become the King of Italy, there was no hope of resurrecting imperial authority. That left Europe on its own. Rome was, however, the seat of power for the Christian Church, and the spiritual authority of the Church would, in time, rival the imperial might of its predecessor.
Not to mention the poor quality of these lines to be edited, calling them the barbarians based on the "textbook" perception of the people is also out of line. It is not the "Latin" Romans, but these Germanic riders from the east along with the languages they brought into Europe, were the "real" foundation of the modern "Anglo" world.
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
The Middle Ages were a complicated period of time which saw Europe arise from a motley assortment of feeble nations into a powerful and vibrant political landscape. By the year 1450, which is generally regarded as the opening year of the Renaissance, Europe had seen the rise of the monarchy, the advances of technology, the weakening of feudalism, and the omnipotence of the Christian Church...
Why suddenly these lines right after lines about Roman Empire? What is this, a draft? And the last line must be in the middle. Take a look at my correction below:
The Middle Ages was a complicated time where the motley assortment of feeble nations of Europe grew into vibrant and powerful political entities. By the mid-15th century, Europe had witnessed its transformation from a continent under the omnipotence of Christian Church into a continent of powerful monarchies rising upon the weakening feudalism and advancing technologies...
Looks like the author, at least when he wrote this book, didn't know that Jean of Arc was canonized in the 20th century (specifically on May 16th, 1920, at Saint Peter's in Vatican by Pope Benedict XV), and the reason for that decision wasn't for her to have "defended France."
Seriously this book often jibber-jabbers with baseless information. Besides, many lines are so mixed up either missing necessary explanations or repeating the same thing over and over again.
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
...Charlemagne would create an empire that would be lost by his heirs. Kings mindful of their own ignorance and lamenting their lack of knowledge would support the growth of learning. By the end of the Renaissance, the medieval mindset was no more, the dominance if the church was tested by the rise of science, and the growth of representative government would gradually alter the balance of power and the concept of the monarchy. Power consumed those who sought it. But the arts enlightened those who enjoyed it, and the Renaissance was flush with artists whose talent made their worlds a living canvas.
What, the writer didn't even know the difference between the "Renaissance" and so-called the "Charlemagne Renaissance" of the late-8th to early-9th century?! The writer was definitely NOT qualified to write about this subject, and in this case a simple editing won't make this book any better!
(Kindle Ed. Chapter 2)
...However, the concept of linear perspective which Brunelleschi employed to such success belonged to another architect, Leon Battista Alberti, whose work On Painting was adopted by other artists...
...whose work On Painting...sigh.
And page 1 starts after the Introduction plus three Chapters...
Anyways, I'm glad to see that the whole Chapter 3 is well-written in good English based on good research works.
(Kindle Ed. p. 6)
...Colonialism and its brutality were not in harmony with the humanism that the Renaissance espoused...
Yup, told you what they even implemented for their slave trade under the name of Humanism.
(Kindle Ed. p. 27)
England underwent its religious division before it entered the Renaissance, so its experience did not depend on the accessibility of reading material from Germany. England, since Henry VIII had split from Rome and declared himself the head of the Church, had been seesawing between Catholic and Protestant religious turmoil...
Yes, it didn't depend on the accessibility of reading material from Germany, but it still started "as" or "after" Renaissance hit the country, so the lines sound awkward in the ears of those who know the topic quite well.
Rather the lines should go like:
...unlike Germany or other places in Europe, where religious reforms were pushed from the bottom to top with the help of new printing technology, in England it was the top, the English monarchy, which pushed the country's religious reforms down to bottom. While four monarchs were taking the throne in turn, England was in religious turmoil seesawing between Catholicism and Protestantism ever since King Henry VIII split from Rome and declared himself the head of the English Church...
Lastly, the Conclusion does not end the book, but it sounds more like the author is introducing a following second/ sequence entitled the "Age of (Great Maritime) Discovery." It works as a good "substitute" con-clos’/ -cus'ion anyway.