The thing with Munro, is that she makes you WORK. And lord knows, I'm lazy – particularly in reading, hence why avoid the titans of Russian literature. Well, as well in other aspects of life. It’s why I choose running over cycling, so I don't have to test my patience to learn how to maintain a bicycle. Or if I’m learning a musical scale with too many sharps and flats required, I find it causes too much of a mental strain and, I tend to skip over these. You get the picture. There's a whole book on this (Thinking, Fast and Slow). The point is if reading is too mentally taxing, the joy is gone.
So there's that, and often times, the stories were so ambiguous, they may well require several reads and post analysis - of which there is a plethora of, and I found myself having to refer to several times after finishing a story. The small details, heck, sometimes the whole point was lost on me, due to the difficulty in following the story (to my chagrin, I had missed a MURDER of a child in one of them, until a review had to make that clear for me). Again, having to do this felt like homework. Truthfully, I'm shocked at how deep people go (are these all university students?) - analyzing street names, character initials, meaningless utterances that somehow are meaningful. Apparently, this is where Munro's genius lies. This over-analysis is something I've also bore witness to in a piece of jazz - people actually transcribe and analyze entire pieces, to the point that I have to ask , did the musician really intend to do that, or were they just feeling it? Can’t we just enjoy the song? Other difficulties were the unconventional non-linear story lines, they jump from one place and time to another. Oh look here, I’ll start this story at the end and then go backwards, towards the end. It didn’t work for TENET and it didn’t work here. Jesus, I was lost so many times, and what a horrible mistake it was to read this behemoth straight through. We’re talking a couple of hundred of characters, which I often got confused. Was Sue the aunt of Charlene – ah fuck no, that was two stories ago.
There had been a hope, that reading this would revive some Canadian patriotism deep down in me, unfortunately the recurring feeling I had was, dear god, how incredibly boring the place can be. There can’t be anything drier to read about then Canadian history (I mean the history we are fed – not the real one about Native American slaughter). Munro’s stories just aren’t contemporary enough for me – several take place in the 1800’s where Jane Doe worked at a sawmill, and then went to church. Ho hum. Even the landscape – you think of small-town Canada as something charming – but nothing could be further from the truth. You need to take drugs to combat the boredom of living there once industry packs up and leaves. Unless you have a massive cottage on the lake, the rest is a barren wasteland – literally and especially culturally. The lone bright spot was a story about a hired help working for a wealthy family with a cottage on the lake – and how she observed these people having access to elite sports: sailing, tennis, golf, and that just make me appreciate Europe all the more – these activities are easily assessable to the common man, not only for Lord ROGERS (one of the Canadian media oligarch families that charges THE MOST EXPENSIVE mobile data plans in the world – which at this point is time is damn near a public necessity, but somehow they’re allowed to just keep fleecing the hordes of immigrants). Excuse me, I got off on a tangent. The stories were mighty let downs and now I must lament the loss of nearly a month of reading.