What do you think?
Rate this book


368 pages, Hardcover
First published June 2, 2016
It’s no good exhorting the world to less, if you don’t consider what that less should consist of. There is little point reducing if you aren’t also refining. Because curation is built around expert selection with concrete goals, curation ensures that reduction and refinement happen in lockstep.
Their curation is based on judgements and instincts honed by tens of thousands of hours of learning and immersion. Good taste, one diffuse but central idea behind curated selections, is carefully cultivated.
The best legacy organisations have spent decades or even centuries building and augmenting that vision. Which is why the Financial Times and Penguin, Gagosian and William Morris Entertainment are all gatekeepers that remain influential, profitable and relevant. For the new emerging gatekeepers, building credibility is the challenge – but they do, and that’s why we have things like Laughing Squid, Vox Media and Wattpad.
Without a blend and balance of different kinds of curation we will fall into self-reinforcing loops of taste and opinion. Rather than open up and explore the world, curation would close it down. One form of curation – let alone one curator – represents a totalitarian vision. A diversity of models and curators mitigates the risk. It opens rather than closes.
Having a strategy for letting others curate, for outsourcing to those on the frontlines, will be more and more essential. It’s a model we have seen time and again on the web and it’s not going away. Social media relies on networks of trust, intimacy and knowledge, amplified by connectivity – given how much curation is about personality and connection, it’s hardly surprising this model is so prevalent.
When curation is built around a sense of what others want, imbued with a service ethic, when it cares about what it curates more than the curation itself, those charges are unfair – curation here is rightly valuable.
consumers initially exposed to limited choices proved considerably more likely to purchase the produce than consumers who had initially encountered a much larger set of options… The more options you have, the more opportunity costs you have incurred, psychologically speaking. We don’t just experience regret after the event either – we anticipate regret. We ruin our own pleasure anticipating regret we might feel about other choices we could make! Which again impedes our ability to choose, inhibiting our desire to make a choice in the first place.
More information, we assume, means we’re better prepared. Yet this isn’t true. After considering about ten parameters our ability to make decisions is impaired. We get confused and lose sight of our priorities. Even ten is a stretch and many psychologists argue anything beyond five is suboptimal. Saturated not just in choices but in information about choices – from the fuel efficiency of an engine to the size of the boot – we struggle to grasp what we want and why we want it.
More complex societies are more costly to maintain than simpler ones, requiring greater support levels per capita. As societies increase in complexity, more networks are created among individuals, more hierarchical controls are created to regulate these networks, more information is processed, there is more centralization of information flow, there is increasing need to support specialists not directly involved in resource production, and the like. All of this complexity is dependent on energy flow.
Shocks that would usually be tough – like a dip in demand for Sunbelt real estate, the initial US trigger for the 2008 crisis – became critical. The system was too complex for the ‘quants’ and economics PhDs to predict or manage. As with the Mayans, a complex superstructure teetered on a base that couldn’t support it. Complexity, which had driven such outsized rewards for bankers and hedge-fund managers, turned into the enemy.
The more complexity we encounter, the more simplification matters. By selecting and arranging, curation takes what is complex and while keeping the essential elements, makes the whole simpler. This is the balancing act of curation – to keep what is important and valuable about complexity, without the overwhelming, overleveraged and overloaded aspects of it.