What do you think?
Rate this book
Male crvene stolice
Naslov romana odnosi se na 20. godišnjicu opsade Sarajeva, koja je obilježena postavljanjem 11541 crvene stolice u čast jednakog broja poginulih u Sarajevu, među kojima i 643 djece.
Roman započinje dolaskom glavnog lika, dr. Vlada Dragana, u učmalo irsko mjestašce Cloonoila, gdje se predstavlja kao iscjelitelj i seksualni terapeut i uskoro svojom karizmom očara mještane, a pogotovo žene. Jedna od mještanki, udana Fidelma McBride, koja je nezadovoljna u braku i nesretna jer nema djece, podliježe njegovom šarmu, što je dovodi u opasnost i na koncu joj posve uništi život, nakon što dozna da je čovjek u kojeg se zaljubila i s kojim je zatrudnjela ratni zločinac.
Kroz roman se provlači tema imigracije, iskorijenjenosti, posljedica rata i prirode zla – kroz opis glavnog lika, psihopatskog monstruma bez sposobnosti za kajanje, koji se pojavljuje u irskom gradiću zamaskiran u kultiviranog, empatičnog iscjelitelja s karizmom koja osvaja mještane. Edna O’Brien za svoj je roman Male crvene stolice dobila brojne pohvale svojih eminentnih kolega – poput slavnog Philipa Rotha, koji je njezin roman proglasio remek-djelom, Josepha O’Connora, koji je ubraja među najveće irske pisce svih vremena, Johna Banvillea, koji roman naziva hrabrim, briljantno napisanim i prije svega humanim.
"Veličanstvena Edna O’Brien napisala je svoje životno djelo." Philip Roth
Roman započinje dolaskom glavnog lika, dr. Vlada Dragana, u učmalo irsko mjestašce Cloonoila, gdje se predstavlja kao iscjelitelj i seksualni terapeut i uskoro svojom karizmom očara mještane, a pogotovo žene. Jedna od mještanki, udana Fidelma McBride, koja je nezadovoljna u braku i nesretna jer nema djece, podliježe njegovom šarmu, što je dovodi u opasnost i na koncu joj posve uništi život, nakon što dozna da je čovjek u kojeg se zaljubila i s kojim je zatrudnjela ratni zločinac.
Kroz roman se provlači tema imigracije, iskorijenjenosti, posljedica rata i prirode zla – kroz opis glavnog lika, psihopatskog monstruma bez sposobnosti za kajanje, koji se pojavljuje u irskom gradiću zamaskiran u kultiviranog, empatičnog iscjelitelja s karizmom koja osvaja mještane. Edna O’Brien za svoj je roman Male crvene stolice dobila brojne pohvale svojih eminentnih kolega – poput slavnog Philipa Rotha, koji je njezin roman proglasio remek-djelom, Josepha O’Connora, koji je ubraja među najveće irske pisce svih vremena, Johna Banvillea, koji roman naziva hrabrim, briljantno napisanim i prije svega humanim.
"Veličanstvena Edna O’Brien napisala je svoje životno djelo." Philip Roth
288 pages, Paperback
First published October 27, 2015
1019 people are currently reading
12402 people want to read
About the author
Edna O'Brien
115 books1,385 followersEdna O’Brien was an award-winning Irish author of novels, plays, and short stories. She has been hailed as one of the greatest chroniclers of the female experience in the twentieth century. She was the 2011 recipient of the Frank O’Connor Prize, awarded for her short story collection Saints and Sinners. She also received, among other honors, the Irish PEN Award for Literature, the Ulysses Medal from University College Dublin, and a lifetime achievement award from the Irish Literary Academy. Her 1960 debut novel, The Country Girls, was banned in her native Ireland for its groundbreaking depictions of female sexuality. Notable works also include August Is a Wicked Month (1965), A Pagan Place (1970), Lantern Slides (1990), and The Light of Evening (2006). O’Brien lived in London until her death.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,728 reviews
December 12, 2015
This book is a mess and I am puzzled by the many laudatory reviews, especially those in the newspapers, where it seems to be taken for granted that O’Brien can do no wrong. I found this a very flawed novel indeed. Ambitious certainly, and I can see that in addressing the problem of evil and the repercussions of the Balkan wars her intentions are admirable. But just because something's worth writing about doesn’t automatically make a novel successful. Divided into three unequal parts, it tells of the arrival in a small Irish village of a new-age type healer and sex therapist. The trope of a stranger coming into a community and disrupting it is a well-worn one, and inevitably Dr Vlad’s arrival has unforeseen consequences. Part 2 is set in London whither his victim Fidelma escapes having become infatuated with him. And the third part takes place at a war crime trial in The Hague, as Dr Vlad turns out to be a wanted war criminal from the Balkans – based on Radovan Karadzic. So all the ingredients of a good novel are here but O’Brien fails to deliver. Characterisation is superficial, especially in the Irish village, where too many Irish stereotypes are depicted. Much of the book consists of vignettes or set-pieces, where far too many characters extraneous to the main plot tell their stories, resulting in too many narrative voices. And the essential themes of immigration, displacement, the effects of war and the nature of evil all become subsumed into a narrative morass. Any story of atrocities in the Balkans already contains plenty of violence but O’Brien adds some gratuitous violence of her own, which goes completely over the top. Most definitely not for me, this one – although I admit that the central image of the red chairs will remain to haunt me, and that’s no bad thing.
November 13, 2019
When Vlad, an Eastern European, turns up in a small Irish village, he certainly stirs it out of its lethargy. He becomes known as The Doctor after setting himself up as a healer, and, being the Svengali figure that he is, he soon has the whole village under his spell, particularly the women. They are soon to discover however, that this charming man is a wanted war criminal.
Fidelma McBride falls for his charms completely, she's besotted, but it will lead her into danger and change her life completely. As with any book that has references to war/conflict, there are some harrowing details, and some very moving moments. It was an interesting story, and it demonstrates how someone with great charisma can hide the very core of evil.
Fidelma McBride falls for his charms completely, she's besotted, but it will lead her into danger and change her life completely. As with any book that has references to war/conflict, there are some harrowing details, and some very moving moments. It was an interesting story, and it demonstrates how someone with great charisma can hide the very core of evil.
June 30, 2016
Edna O'Brien's novels were once censored in her native Ireland. The graphic nature of her subject matter—the violent, shameful, behind-closed-doors reality of Irish rural and religious life—have shocked and scandalized since her fiction debut, The Country Girls in 1960. Now eighty-five, she continues to challenge our notions of innocence and guilt, of sex and desire, of politics and prose. The Little Red Chairs, her first novel in ten years, is classic O'Brien: terrible and beautiful, unsentimental and transcendent.
There has always been something otherworldly, a little faerie tale-ish, about O'Brien's writing—a blend of lilting lyricism and fabulist style—that often distances the reader from the immediacy of the tragic worlds she portrays, like a layer of moss softening the blows from the hammerhead of her pen. In this instance she places us, as she often does, in the petty intimacy of an Irish village, a sodden, lush, secret place that both shelters and punishes its inhabitants with religion and tradition and family.
Fidelma is married to a man more than twenty years her senior and, as her husband becomes an old man in the grips of early dementia, she is choked by regret and loneliness. Longing for both children and passion, Fidelma wanders alone through the green fields and forests outside the western Ireland village of Cloonoila, fighting her body's yearnings. Thus, she is an easy mark for the town's newest resident, the mysterious Vladimir Dragan, a self-proclaimed healer and sex therapist. Vlad, with his long white hair, his black cloak and white gloves, and thick, seductive accent, seems a Gothic caricature. Fidelma is not the only Cloonoila resident to be caught in Dr. Dragan's spell: several nearly-comedic encounters, including the massage given to Sister Bonaventure, elevate Vlad to near-mystical regard by the villagers.
Then Fidelma becomes pregnant and the novel's murky, dreamy undertone takes a desperate, wretched turn toward verisimilitude. Let this serve as a trigger warning for those who cannot read graphic violence, particularly against women (a warning which should accompany nearly any O'Brien novel). Doctor Vlad is in fact a Serbian warlord known as “the beast of Bosnia,” accused of torture and genocide against Bosnian Croats and Muslims. The novel leaves the seemingly safe surrounds of rural Ireland and crash-lands in London, where Fidelma serves as a window into the world of exploited migrant workers. We travel with her into the Kent countryside, in search of refuge and redemption, and finally to The Hague and a war crimes tribunal, in search of justice.
Based on the hunt for the leader of the Serb Republic in Bosnia, Radovan Karadzic, who was captured in 2008 after thirteen years in hiding, The Little Red Chairs—like Lidia Yuknavitch's 2015 The Small Backs of Children—shows us the ancillary victims of war, the lives destroyed beyond the battlefields. She also explores themes of guilt and complicity, our unwitting acceptance of others' lies because we are so desperate to ignore our own truths. O'Brien smashes once again this notion of a charming Ireland knitted together by legend and rain with a hammer of reality ripped from headlines. Fidelma—at first a hapless victim—becomes a witness to others' suffering, as O'Brien herself has often done as a writer, finding redemption and courage in the raw humanity around her.
Gorgeously written, in bold prose that breaks all rules of conventional fiction writing, O'Brien's seventeenth novel shows a writer, now in her ninth decade, at her most fierce and powerful. I am in awe.
There has always been something otherworldly, a little faerie tale-ish, about O'Brien's writing—a blend of lilting lyricism and fabulist style—that often distances the reader from the immediacy of the tragic worlds she portrays, like a layer of moss softening the blows from the hammerhead of her pen. In this instance she places us, as she often does, in the petty intimacy of an Irish village, a sodden, lush, secret place that both shelters and punishes its inhabitants with religion and tradition and family.
Fidelma is married to a man more than twenty years her senior and, as her husband becomes an old man in the grips of early dementia, she is choked by regret and loneliness. Longing for both children and passion, Fidelma wanders alone through the green fields and forests outside the western Ireland village of Cloonoila, fighting her body's yearnings. Thus, she is an easy mark for the town's newest resident, the mysterious Vladimir Dragan, a self-proclaimed healer and sex therapist. Vlad, with his long white hair, his black cloak and white gloves, and thick, seductive accent, seems a Gothic caricature. Fidelma is not the only Cloonoila resident to be caught in Dr. Dragan's spell: several nearly-comedic encounters, including the massage given to Sister Bonaventure, elevate Vlad to near-mystical regard by the villagers.
Then Fidelma becomes pregnant and the novel's murky, dreamy undertone takes a desperate, wretched turn toward verisimilitude. Let this serve as a trigger warning for those who cannot read graphic violence, particularly against women (a warning which should accompany nearly any O'Brien novel). Doctor Vlad is in fact a Serbian warlord known as “the beast of Bosnia,” accused of torture and genocide against Bosnian Croats and Muslims. The novel leaves the seemingly safe surrounds of rural Ireland and crash-lands in London, where Fidelma serves as a window into the world of exploited migrant workers. We travel with her into the Kent countryside, in search of refuge and redemption, and finally to The Hague and a war crimes tribunal, in search of justice.
Based on the hunt for the leader of the Serb Republic in Bosnia, Radovan Karadzic, who was captured in 2008 after thirteen years in hiding, The Little Red Chairs—like Lidia Yuknavitch's 2015 The Small Backs of Children—shows us the ancillary victims of war, the lives destroyed beyond the battlefields. She also explores themes of guilt and complicity, our unwitting acceptance of others' lies because we are so desperate to ignore our own truths. O'Brien smashes once again this notion of a charming Ireland knitted together by legend and rain with a hammer of reality ripped from headlines. Fidelma—at first a hapless victim—becomes a witness to others' suffering, as O'Brien herself has often done as a writer, finding redemption and courage in the raw humanity around her.
Gorgeously written, in bold prose that breaks all rules of conventional fiction writing, O'Brien's seventeenth novel shows a writer, now in her ninth decade, at her most fierce and powerful. I am in awe.
June 4, 2022
This is a terrible book with ludicrous characters BUT it's terrible in a really good way, and the ludicrous characters are never boring. It's as if master storyteller O'Brien were a master jazz pianist sitting down blindfolded in front of a deeply out of tune piano--it still sounds terrific. She riffs on anything she pleases, writing on and on about inconsequential trivia about characters who have no point being in this story. It feels like O'Brien just let any skinny bit of thought that came into her head make its way to the page and then she worked it and made it beautiful. She is so talented--she is even channeling Virginia Woolf here and there, I would say--just compare the chapter "On the Veranda" to early chapters in The Voyage Out. The lovely stark beginning which gives this book its title is the best part, though--the novel never reaches the solemn promise of those little red chairs.
June 19, 2016
I usually try not to write plot summaries in my reviews, but in the case of this novel I think a brief one is necessary if I'm going to explain how I felt about it. However, unlike the publisher in the marketing blurb, I will try not to spoil the whole thing for the reader.
The Little Red Chairs begins in a small Irish town full of quirky small-town types, like Stars Hollow but with more nuns. A mysterious stranger named Vlad shows up and sets up shop as a "healer," with botanical remedies and massages and the like, and his practices are so effective that soon the whole town is enamored of him, most especially a married woman named Fidelma who falls for him hard. Of course, it then turns out that Vlad, like most mysterious strangers who turn up in small towns, has an unsavory past he's fleeing—but his unsavory past is, no exaggeration, at least two billion times more unsavory than any past you could possibly imagine for a mysterious stranger. Fidelma experiences some serious fallout from this revelation and goes on her own journey, both literal and figurative, as a result.
My main problem with this novel is, again, hard to describe without spoilers, but what it amounts to is that Edna O'Brien tries to convey the immense suffering of people in a horrific wartime situation through the misfortunes of a white, First-World, relatively privileged woman who is only tangentially connected to that situation. It's almost as if O'Brien believes that many of her readers couldn't possibly sympathize with the victims unless everything was filtered through a character who is "more like them." I found the whole thing bizarre and borderline offensive, this idea that the best way for us to understand a tragedy is to look at something slightly to the side of it instead of directly at it. It didn't work for me at all; it nagged at me the entire time I was reading.
Of course, good writing is everything, and it's possible that even this strange setup might have worked if the book were put together well, but alas, that's not the case here. I really enjoyed getting to know the townspeople at the beginning of the novel; O'Brien does an excellent job of setting the scene there. Unfortunately, once Vlad's secret is revealed, the town is abandoned for other locales and all that effective scene-setting goes to waste.
The book also features numerous monologues by characters describing the conditions that forced them to flee their own countries for asylum in another. Some of these monologues were educational, but as far as the structure of the book is concerned, awkward doesn't even begin to describe them. Clearly O'Brien wanted us to get a sense of what refugees go through, and I appreciate that intent, but there had to be a better way than just having minor characters show up, speak for several pages, and then disappear from the plot. And it isn't only refugees who make use of this device—the worst, most extreme example of this technique occurs in the way the reader learns of Vlad's terrible secret: A dead friend of Vlad's turns up in his dream and explains the whole thing to him—again, in a speech that goes on for several pages. Despite the disturbing subject matter, I found this scene unintentionally hilarious. I mean, a dead friend showing up in Vlad's dream to expound at length on something Vlad already knows? This is exposition at its most clumsy.
Sadly, I also really disliked the character of Fidelma. Anytime you put a character in front of me who's been in a bad marriage for decades, has done literally nothing about it the whole time, and then does something drastic and destructive, I'm going to have a hard time believing in the essential morality of that character. There's nothing admirable about keeping your feelings inside for forever and then acting out like a child. Beyond that, despite the horrible consequences Fidelma pays for her actions—consequences that I would never wish on a living soul—I found her subsequent life hard to sympathize with: She was a highly privileged, babied woman who eventually had to live a life more like the rest of us live. Poor thing. And the fact that supposed "redemption" for Vlad's heinous acts comes through her, rather than through someone more directly affected by what he did, was, again, hard for me to swallow. If an author is going to take one character and make her stand in for a vast number of suffering people, that better be one great character. Unfortunately, Fidelma is not up to the task.
To me, this book read like a first draft: rough and unwieldy, with a lot of characters that needed more development and ideas that needed much better integration into the plot. It was my first book by Edna O'Brien and definitely won't be my last, but I do wish we could have had a better introduction.
I won this book via a First Reads giveaway here on Goodreads.
The Little Red Chairs begins in a small Irish town full of quirky small-town types, like Stars Hollow but with more nuns. A mysterious stranger named Vlad shows up and sets up shop as a "healer," with botanical remedies and massages and the like, and his practices are so effective that soon the whole town is enamored of him, most especially a married woman named Fidelma who falls for him hard. Of course, it then turns out that Vlad, like most mysterious strangers who turn up in small towns, has an unsavory past he's fleeing—but his unsavory past is, no exaggeration, at least two billion times more unsavory than any past you could possibly imagine for a mysterious stranger. Fidelma experiences some serious fallout from this revelation and goes on her own journey, both literal and figurative, as a result.
My main problem with this novel is, again, hard to describe without spoilers, but what it amounts to is that Edna O'Brien tries to convey the immense suffering of people in a horrific wartime situation through the misfortunes of a white, First-World, relatively privileged woman who is only tangentially connected to that situation. It's almost as if O'Brien believes that many of her readers couldn't possibly sympathize with the victims unless everything was filtered through a character who is "more like them." I found the whole thing bizarre and borderline offensive, this idea that the best way for us to understand a tragedy is to look at something slightly to the side of it instead of directly at it. It didn't work for me at all; it nagged at me the entire time I was reading.
Of course, good writing is everything, and it's possible that even this strange setup might have worked if the book were put together well, but alas, that's not the case here. I really enjoyed getting to know the townspeople at the beginning of the novel; O'Brien does an excellent job of setting the scene there. Unfortunately, once Vlad's secret is revealed, the town is abandoned for other locales and all that effective scene-setting goes to waste.
The book also features numerous monologues by characters describing the conditions that forced them to flee their own countries for asylum in another. Some of these monologues were educational, but as far as the structure of the book is concerned, awkward doesn't even begin to describe them. Clearly O'Brien wanted us to get a sense of what refugees go through, and I appreciate that intent, but there had to be a better way than just having minor characters show up, speak for several pages, and then disappear from the plot. And it isn't only refugees who make use of this device—the worst, most extreme example of this technique occurs in the way the reader learns of Vlad's terrible secret: A dead friend of Vlad's turns up in his dream and explains the whole thing to him—again, in a speech that goes on for several pages. Despite the disturbing subject matter, I found this scene unintentionally hilarious. I mean, a dead friend showing up in Vlad's dream to expound at length on something Vlad already knows? This is exposition at its most clumsy.
Sadly, I also really disliked the character of Fidelma. Anytime you put a character in front of me who's been in a bad marriage for decades, has done literally nothing about it the whole time, and then does something drastic and destructive, I'm going to have a hard time believing in the essential morality of that character. There's nothing admirable about keeping your feelings inside for forever and then acting out like a child. Beyond that, despite the horrible consequences Fidelma pays for her actions—consequences that I would never wish on a living soul—I found her subsequent life hard to sympathize with: She was a highly privileged, babied woman who eventually had to live a life more like the rest of us live. Poor thing. And the fact that supposed "redemption" for Vlad's heinous acts comes through her, rather than through someone more directly affected by what he did, was, again, hard for me to swallow. If an author is going to take one character and make her stand in for a vast number of suffering people, that better be one great character. Unfortunately, Fidelma is not up to the task.
To me, this book read like a first draft: rough and unwieldy, with a lot of characters that needed more development and ideas that needed much better integration into the plot. It was my first book by Edna O'Brien and definitely won't be my last, but I do wish we could have had a better introduction.
I won this book via a First Reads giveaway here on Goodreads.
February 16, 2019
Red, as in Scarlet, Raging.., Bloody..., Ireland Warning: contains one of the most diabolical, horrendous acts of sexual violence against a female in all literature.
[]
Review:
You live in a quaint, if a little busybody, Irish hamlet, a beauty swept off her feet by a much older man, walking down the aisle in your well-earned white wedding dress. 15, 20 years pass in your nice little humdrum life with your husband, yet your clock is ticking and his dock ain't kicking.
A very distinguished, intriguing, attractive foreign (perhaps Russian) doctor/chiropractor in his early 40s moves into town, renting a room near your art shop. At a social gathering, he subtly suggests you look like the kind of woman who needs a lover. Your biological clock starts to wind in the corner of your mind, and you seek a child with this man, a child your husband cannot give you.
Weeks/months of insatiable attention and you become pregnant despite knowing now of a few of your moody lover's negative character traits. Then One Day government agents blow into your village to make a highly publicized arrest of Serbia's most wanted war criminal (think, Milosevic, Karadzic).
PapaDaddy is, as it turns out, the Prince of Darkness, Beëlzebub in the body, Father of Lies in the flesh, Author of Evil, the Old Serpent.
This novel blasts with double-barrels, driven by morally difficult questions and, to my mind, unloading on some Catholic Church leaders as at best judgmental, indifferent to humanity, and unworthy of reflecting the Redeemer, or worse, complicit in abetting such a monstrous castigation that even Lucifer would look away. Ms. O'Brien has never shied away from criticizing or offending the Catholic Church of her Ireland.
[] Review:
You live in a quaint, if a little busybody, Irish hamlet, a beauty swept off her feet by a much older man, walking down the aisle in your well-earned white wedding dress. 15, 20 years pass in your nice little humdrum life with your husband, yet your clock is ticking and his dock ain't kicking.
A very distinguished, intriguing, attractive foreign (perhaps Russian) doctor/chiropractor in his early 40s moves into town, renting a room near your art shop. At a social gathering, he subtly suggests you look like the kind of woman who needs a lover. Your biological clock starts to wind in the corner of your mind, and you seek a child with this man, a child your husband cannot give you.
Weeks/months of insatiable attention and you become pregnant despite knowing now of a few of your moody lover's negative character traits. Then One Day government agents blow into your village to make a highly publicized arrest of Serbia's most wanted war criminal (think, Milosevic, Karadzic).
PapaDaddy is, as it turns out, the Prince of Darkness, Beëlzebub in the body, Father of Lies in the flesh, Author of Evil, the Old Serpent.
This novel blasts with double-barrels, driven by morally difficult questions and, to my mind, unloading on some Catholic Church leaders as at best judgmental, indifferent to humanity, and unworthy of reflecting the Redeemer, or worse, complicit in abetting such a monstrous castigation that even Lucifer would look away. Ms. O'Brien has never shied away from criticizing or offending the Catholic Church of her Ireland.
Read
April 6, 2016Awesome writing, original idea for a plot, plucking the Butcher of Sarajevo down in a small Irish Village. Alas, after reading 50% I am abandon,g this one. I am too much of a wimpy reader, and the third very graphic description of violence has done me in. Others with stronger stomachs may take this on but not for me.
March 28, 2016
Edna O’Brien’s chilling new novel inspired by the life of Radovan Karadzic arrives just as the Butcher of Bosnia has finally been sentenced to 40 years in prison for genocide. If Karadzic’s long-delayed punishment brings some element of resolution to the Bosnian civil war, O’Brien’s novel picks at that war’s scars, forcing us to feel the lingering, outlying disfigurement wreaked by an evil man.
Europeans are more likely than Americans to catch the poignant allusion in O’Brien’s title, “The Little Red Chairs.” In 2012, on the 20th anniversary of the Siege of Sarajevo, a theater company filled the center of that once smoldering town with 11,541 red chairs to commemorate the lives of the victims. More than 600 of those chairs were little ones representing the children who had been killed.
But nothing about this book’s opening betrays such. . . .
To read the rest of this review, go to The Washington Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entert...
Europeans are more likely than Americans to catch the poignant allusion in O’Brien’s title, “The Little Red Chairs.” In 2012, on the 20th anniversary of the Siege of Sarajevo, a theater company filled the center of that once smoldering town with 11,541 red chairs to commemorate the lives of the victims. More than 600 of those chairs were little ones representing the children who had been killed.
But nothing about this book’s opening betrays such. . . .
To read the rest of this review, go to The Washington Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/entert...
July 21, 2024
I never use the word love with regard to novels, but here it's necessary. This is an absolutely astonishing book. Every page possesses new wonders and great literary pleasure. Philip Roth called it O'Brien's "masterpiece." High praise methinks. It's the most rewarding book I've read so far this year — except perhaps for Old God's Time by Sebastian Barry, also an Irish writer. BTW, O'Brien wrote this one while in her eighties.
February 9, 2017
I finished this book with tears in my eyes, moved by its depth and the unexpected places it took me. There is a dreamlike quality to O’Brien’s storytelling. We are immediately dropped into the small and somewhat isolated Irish Village of Cloonoila, where one winter’s day, seemingly out of nowhere, a larger-than-life man arrives. This unusual man is a poet and new age healer who seems just what’s needed to add some spark to the lives of the villagers. But the new arrival, Vladimir Dragan, is also a man with a past. His magical aura enchants many in the town, but they do not know that Dr. Vlad is also the man who orchestrated the murder of thousands of Bosnian Croats and Muslims during the Balkans War. O’Brien bases Dr. Vlad’s character on the real Butcher of Sarajevo, Radovan Karadžić, who famously hid out for 12 years in Belgrade as a new-age healer before being caught. (This is a fascinating article on his years as new age healer Dragan Dabic http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/mag....) Interesting, he was sentenced to 40 years in jail for war crimes just a few days before this book was published, after a 5-year trial.
But I digress. Dr. Vlad is not necessarily the main focus of The Little Red Chairs. His appearance in Cloonoila and his subsequent interactions and relationships with some of her residents is only a jumping off point for O’Brien to share some profound truths about human nature and life. The focus of TLRC is primarily Fidelma McBride, who has the most intimate relationship with Dr. Vlad, for which she experiences serious consequences. It’s Fidelma’s journey that teaches us the most. That we are all vulnerable and can all be complicit. That people are not one-dimensional. That our experience can do us in or can cause us to find our resilience. That life can take us in unexpected directions, whether from a wrong decision or a right one that didn’t take us where we thought it would. That many people experience dislocation for a multitude of reasons. That we all have a story to tell. That people we meet in our journey will surprise us in both their caring and their cruelty. That where life takes us is perhaps where we needed to be all along. And that in the end, we’re all looking for home with a capital H.
I know from reviews that the structure of the book and the three very graphic passages of gruesome violence did not sit well with many readers. For me, the way O’Brien fashioned this novel in “set pieces” (as one reviewer described them) reflected how life often plays out and it drew me in, making me wonder where we were going. Be forewarned that the nightmarish violent scenes are hard to take and almost stopped me from proceeding. But I’m glad I persevered. The story told in The Little Red Chairs has given me lots to think about and I believe will stick with me for a long while.
Kudos to Juliet Stevenson for her marvelous reading of this book.
But I digress. Dr. Vlad is not necessarily the main focus of The Little Red Chairs. His appearance in Cloonoila and his subsequent interactions and relationships with some of her residents is only a jumping off point for O’Brien to share some profound truths about human nature and life. The focus of TLRC is primarily Fidelma McBride, who has the most intimate relationship with Dr. Vlad, for which she experiences serious consequences. It’s Fidelma’s journey that teaches us the most. That we are all vulnerable and can all be complicit. That people are not one-dimensional. That our experience can do us in or can cause us to find our resilience. That life can take us in unexpected directions, whether from a wrong decision or a right one that didn’t take us where we thought it would. That many people experience dislocation for a multitude of reasons. That we all have a story to tell. That people we meet in our journey will surprise us in both their caring and their cruelty. That where life takes us is perhaps where we needed to be all along. And that in the end, we’re all looking for home with a capital H.
I know from reviews that the structure of the book and the three very graphic passages of gruesome violence did not sit well with many readers. For me, the way O’Brien fashioned this novel in “set pieces” (as one reviewer described them) reflected how life often plays out and it drew me in, making me wonder where we were going. Be forewarned that the nightmarish violent scenes are hard to take and almost stopped me from proceeding. But I’m glad I persevered. The story told in The Little Red Chairs has given me lots to think about and I believe will stick with me for a long while.
Kudos to Juliet Stevenson for her marvelous reading of this book.
September 28, 2016
Just random notes:
The Bosnian war. Brutal, barbaric, shocking. Graphic.
The mores and values of an Irish community: good and bad.
A naive woman falls in love with a monster. She faces the consequences.
London: war refugees from different countries relate their stories.
A trial in The Hague concludes the book.
And I just close the book exhausted, traumatized, and walk away, just as unsentimental as the author presented the tale.
I need some air.
Read
September 21, 2021"On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in road along the 800 metres of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for each Sarajevan killed during the 1,425 days of siege. 643 small chairs represented the children killed by snipers & the heavy artillery fired from he surrounding mountains."
That statement opens this book.
The problem is that the heft and content of the novel has to equal the power of that statement. I am not sure that it does for me although it is a very interesting story. Sir Humphrey from "Yes, minister" might even call it a brave book, then again Edna O'Brien is a well-established author, she does not have to prove herself to anybody else.
The book is divided in three sections. In the first, Radovan Karadzic (in disguise as a holistic healer and sex therapist ) walks into a bar somewhere in the wild west of Ireland after the 2008 crash and he establishes himself as therapist, football coach, and itinerant poet (etc, etc) . He has a relationship with Fidelma McBride . Eventually he is arrested.
In the second part (circa 100 pages) we follow Fidelma as she lives and works in London.
The last part (around 40 pages long) is focused on Fidelma as she attends the last days of Karadzic's trial for war crimes at the Hague.
Each part has a multitude of characters, each with their own story; frequently of displacement, war and loss. Typing now, I might venture to be as bold as to possibly think that all this is a way to show that the experiences of the war following from the break up of Yugoslavia are both particular and universal. The mystery might be why is empathy and assistance not universal, when the rise of the charismatic to power and the traumas they give rise to is?
There are abrupt changes in the narrative, there is both omniscient and first person narration.
In the first part there is a scene at a book club, the reading group are reading and discussing the Aeneid, specifically the death of Dido . I read the scene in full scoff more - sure a non-specialist book club, open to everyone, would be reading Virgil. Later, while weeding in the garden , it struck me that the story of Dido and Aeneas was the story of Fidelma and Karadzic in this novel.
Long story made short; this is a novel with many apparently disparate elements, over time though at least for me they relate to each other more strongly, perhaps in half a year's time the whole might even feel musically harmonious.
This is a novel that contains a lot of violence and misery, but it also changed register rapidly has humourious juxtapositions and characters - I loved that Fidelma's romantic story of choice was the playboy of the western world, but does it all equal the thoughts and the feelings that you have thinking of a child shot by a sniper, I can't say that it does for me, but then that is the risk a writer takes.
That statement opens this book.
The problem is that the heft and content of the novel has to equal the power of that statement. I am not sure that it does for me although it is a very interesting story. Sir Humphrey from "Yes, minister" might even call it a brave book, then again Edna O'Brien is a well-established author, she does not have to prove herself to anybody else.
The book is divided in three sections. In the first, Radovan Karadzic (in disguise as a holistic healer and sex therapist ) walks into a bar somewhere in the wild west of Ireland after the 2008 crash and he establishes himself as therapist, football coach, and itinerant poet (etc, etc) . He has a relationship with Fidelma McBride . Eventually he is arrested.
In the second part (circa 100 pages) we follow Fidelma as she lives and works in London.
The last part (around 40 pages long) is focused on Fidelma as she attends the last days of Karadzic's trial for war crimes at the Hague.
Each part has a multitude of characters, each with their own story; frequently of displacement, war and loss. Typing now, I might venture to be as bold as to possibly think that all this is a way to show that the experiences of the war following from the break up of Yugoslavia are both particular and universal. The mystery might be why is empathy and assistance not universal, when the rise of the charismatic to power and the traumas they give rise to is?
There are abrupt changes in the narrative, there is both omniscient and first person narration.
In the first part there is a scene at a book club, the reading group are reading and discussing the Aeneid, specifically the death of Dido . I read the scene in full scoff more - sure a non-specialist book club, open to everyone, would be reading Virgil. Later, while weeding in the garden , it struck me that the story of Dido and Aeneas was the story of Fidelma and Karadzic in this novel.
Long story made short; this is a novel with many apparently disparate elements, over time though at least for me they relate to each other more strongly, perhaps in half a year's time the whole might even feel musically harmonious.
This is a novel that contains a lot of violence and misery, but it also changed register rapidly has humourious juxtapositions and characters - I loved that Fidelma's romantic story of choice was the playboy of the western world, but does it all equal the thoughts and the feelings that you have thinking of a child shot by a sniper, I can't say that it does for me, but then that is the risk a writer takes.
January 4, 2025
A new age, messianic guru from the Balkans arrives in an Irish village in the early 2000s. His mysterious and charismatic desire to bring healing ends up devastating individuals and the community.
“From the slenderest twigs of the overhanging trees in the Folk Park, the melting ice drips, with the soft, susurrus sound and the hooped metal sculpture, and eyesore to many locals, is improved by a straggling necklace of icicles, bluish in that frosted night.”
The often beautiful writing is offset by apparently random mixes of tense in the same sentence, and the increasingly horrific things described.
Image: Ice dripping from a tree (Source)
It’s essentially about evil in one’s midst: realisation, repercussions, revenge, and maybe forgiveness. Guilt, too. Possibly karma. People need healing from the wounds inflicted by the healer.
I started this without thinking much about what the title referred to. When it’s revealed to all, TV crews descend on the village “taken in by his mesmerism, his tree hugging, his aura, his tripe… There was shock, repugnance and disbelief. For a while I wondered why I was reading of such horrors - and they got worse (a horrendous and graphic sexual assault). However, around the midpoint, it switched to the aftermath for a main character, and I wanted to know more, though it still felt patchy and disjointed.
What, why?
• Why write about such horrors, with so little little…? I’m not sure what’s missing, but it felt gratuitous and unjustified.
• Why the tense changes and random chapters in the first person? Is it just to create unease, or is there a deeper reason?
• Why so many diversions into other people’s stories that don’t lead anywhere or add much?
Image: Menace in the trees (Source)
Quotes
• “The trees are still the same trees, but she senses menace in them.”
• “She looked at him in that first sweet exchange of a glance and felt a sudden gladness, for the sake of which all other things were forgotten.”
• “We are a jolly group but put us in [military] uniform and all that change [sic]. In war I don’t know who my brother. In war I don’t know who my friend. War make everybody savage.”
• “Who can say what lies inside the heart of each one of us when everything is taken away.”
• “They were night people, one step away from ghosts, and strangers to each other.” [Night-shift office cleaners.]
• “So silent, so neutral was the atmosphere, it was impossible to guess who was friend and who was foe.”
• “The eyes have a yielding compassion that bears no resemblance to the man sitting there.”
• “A trace of him still lurked in her, minute and spectral, that effluvial stain that would be her stigmata forever.”
See also
• What if you were carrying the child of a monster, or you fear your child is a monster? See Doris Lessing’s The Fifth Child, which I reviewed HERE.
• The Little Red Chairs artwork and meaning, HERE and HERE.
“From the slenderest twigs of the overhanging trees in the Folk Park, the melting ice drips, with the soft, susurrus sound and the hooped metal sculpture, and eyesore to many locals, is improved by a straggling necklace of icicles, bluish in that frosted night.”
The often beautiful writing is offset by apparently random mixes of tense in the same sentence, and the increasingly horrific things described.
Image: Ice dripping from a tree (Source)
It’s essentially about evil in one’s midst: realisation, repercussions, revenge, and maybe forgiveness. Guilt, too. Possibly karma. People need healing from the wounds inflicted by the healer.
I started this without thinking much about what the title referred to. When it’s revealed to all, TV crews descend on the village “taken in by his mesmerism, his tree hugging, his aura, his tripe… There was shock, repugnance and disbelief. For a while I wondered why I was reading of such horrors - and they got worse (a horrendous and graphic sexual assault). However, around the midpoint, it switched to the aftermath for a main character, and I wanted to know more, though it still felt patchy and disjointed.
What, why?
• Why write about such horrors, with so little little…? I’m not sure what’s missing, but it felt gratuitous and unjustified.
• Why the tense changes and random chapters in the first person? Is it just to create unease, or is there a deeper reason?
• Why so many diversions into other people’s stories that don’t lead anywhere or add much?
Image: Menace in the trees (Source)
Quotes
• “The trees are still the same trees, but she senses menace in them.”
• “She looked at him in that first sweet exchange of a glance and felt a sudden gladness, for the sake of which all other things were forgotten.”
• “We are a jolly group but put us in [military] uniform and all that change [sic]. In war I don’t know who my brother. In war I don’t know who my friend. War make everybody savage.”
• “Who can say what lies inside the heart of each one of us when everything is taken away.”
• “They were night people, one step away from ghosts, and strangers to each other.” [Night-shift office cleaners.]
• “So silent, so neutral was the atmosphere, it was impossible to guess who was friend and who was foe.”
• “The eyes have a yielding compassion that bears no resemblance to the man sitting there.”
• “A trace of him still lurked in her, minute and spectral, that effluvial stain that would be her stigmata forever.”
See also
• What if you were carrying the child of a monster, or you fear your child is a monster? See Doris Lessing’s The Fifth Child, which I reviewed HERE.
• The Little Red Chairs artwork and meaning, HERE and HERE.
February 5, 2017
I`m not really sure how I feel about this book. In parts shocking and brutal but written in such an emotionless way. Having never read Edna O`Brien before I don`t know her writing style but have to say this was not for me. I couldn`t connect to anyone and for me to love a book that`s what I have to do.
November 30, 2016
Excellent and ambitious novel. My first by O'Brien...definitely not my last. I am grateful to Constant Reader for this having been a group selection.
The title of this book is explained at the outset which definitely flavors one's reading.
On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the
twentieth anniversary of the start of the siege
of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red
chairs,were laid out in rows along the eight
hundred metres of the Sarajevo high street.
One empty chair for every Sarajevan killed
during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred
and forty-three small chairs represented the
children killed by snipers and the heavy ar-
tillery fired from the surrounding mountains.
As the story begins and a stranger enters the small Irish town of Cloonoila, this message should not be lost. O'Brien uses her own subtle and non-specific foreshadowing.
Bearded and in a long dark coat and white
gloves, he stands on the narrow bridge, looks
down at the roaring current, then looks around,
seemingly a little lost, his presence the single
curiosity in the monotony of a winter evening
in a freezing backwater that passes for a town
and is named Cloonoila.
Long afterwards there would be those who
reported strange occurrences on that same
winter evening; dogs barking crazily, as if
there was thunder, and the sound of the
nightingale, whose song and warblings were
never heard so far west... (p 4)
This new man will bring many types of change to this small community, change none of them could possibly foresee. He could not foresee.
This novel alternates moments of quiet beauty, thoughtful insight, and remembered depravity. A very interesting presentation. I'm struck by several elements of this book: in particular, the use of imagery of the natural world and the disjointed appearance of the narrative at times. This latter device may be an aspect of the story itself, a means of presenting/representing the emotional upheaval at work. At least it appears like that to me. Then I wonder...did the author plan this or did it evolve from the story?
There is much fracturing of community shown here...remembered incidents from the Balkans, incidents in Cloonoila, the disparate and variously fractured immigrant community of London, all searching for a home, one of them a refugee from that small Irish town.
It was called the Centre and people from all
over came in search of advice, then once a
fortnight they gathered to share the stories of
their fractured lives... They are there because
they have nowhere else to go. Nobodies, mere
numbers on paper or computer, the hunted, the
haunted, the raped, the defeated, the mutilated,
the banished, the flotsam of the world, unable
to go home, wherever home is. (p 203)
This novel is powerful, difficult, beautifully written, but also manages to to introduce elements of hope into memories of some of mankind's worst moments and very current issues. It is timely and recommended because, as has been said before, we must never forget and we must always help the victims.
The title of this book is explained at the outset which definitely flavors one's reading.
On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the
twentieth anniversary of the start of the siege
of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red
chairs,were laid out in rows along the eight
hundred metres of the Sarajevo high street.
One empty chair for every Sarajevan killed
during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred
and forty-three small chairs represented the
children killed by snipers and the heavy ar-
tillery fired from the surrounding mountains.
As the story begins and a stranger enters the small Irish town of Cloonoila, this message should not be lost. O'Brien uses her own subtle and non-specific foreshadowing.
Bearded and in a long dark coat and white
gloves, he stands on the narrow bridge, looks
down at the roaring current, then looks around,
seemingly a little lost, his presence the single
curiosity in the monotony of a winter evening
in a freezing backwater that passes for a town
and is named Cloonoila.
Long afterwards there would be those who
reported strange occurrences on that same
winter evening; dogs barking crazily, as if
there was thunder, and the sound of the
nightingale, whose song and warblings were
never heard so far west... (p 4)
This new man will bring many types of change to this small community, change none of them could possibly foresee. He could not foresee.
This novel alternates moments of quiet beauty, thoughtful insight, and remembered depravity. A very interesting presentation. I'm struck by several elements of this book: in particular, the use of imagery of the natural world and the disjointed appearance of the narrative at times. This latter device may be an aspect of the story itself, a means of presenting/representing the emotional upheaval at work. At least it appears like that to me. Then I wonder...did the author plan this or did it evolve from the story?
There is much fracturing of community shown here...remembered incidents from the Balkans, incidents in Cloonoila, the disparate and variously fractured immigrant community of London, all searching for a home, one of them a refugee from that small Irish town.
It was called the Centre and people from all
over came in search of advice, then once a
fortnight they gathered to share the stories of
their fractured lives... They are there because
they have nowhere else to go. Nobodies, mere
numbers on paper or computer, the hunted, the
haunted, the raped, the defeated, the mutilated,
the banished, the flotsam of the world, unable
to go home, wherever home is. (p 203)
This novel is powerful, difficult, beautifully written, but also manages to to introduce elements of hope into memories of some of mankind's worst moments and very current issues. It is timely and recommended because, as has been said before, we must never forget and we must always help the victims.
November 29, 2020
Though this is the O’Brien I own, it probably shouldn’t have been the first I read. The premise seemed promising, but I could never get a handle on its style, and I don’t know if it’s indicative of her earlier work.
The initial encounters of the main character, Fidelma, with the men who use and abuse her, came across to me as contrived. Her suffering at the hands of three brutes is real and horrific, but I question her willingness to go off with them as easily, and as innocently, as she does. The last scene with her husband also felt contrived: how many dramatic encounters can one woman have.
But my main issue with the novel is the monologues that come out of the mouths of the many damaged characters in Fidelma’s world. While their stories, in and of themselves, are worthy to be told, there is no transitioning. It’s as if these characters are in a musical, suddenly bursting into song. Three-fourths of the way through the book, after I thought these stories had ended and I could settle into Fidelma’s present-day story, another character arrived and—right before his departure from the narrative— he told his own lengthy tale. It felt, once again, contrived.
While the title is intriguing, referencing a powerful art installation commemorating the deaths of children during the siege of Sarajevo, it doesn’t fit what’s in the pages. But perhaps commemoration is all O’Brien was going for, a worthy enough goal: I just didn’t connect with it.
The initial encounters of the main character, Fidelma, with the men who use and abuse her, came across to me as contrived. Her suffering at the hands of three brutes is real and horrific, but I question her willingness to go off with them as easily, and as innocently, as she does. The last scene with her husband also felt contrived: how many dramatic encounters can one woman have.
But my main issue with the novel is the monologues that come out of the mouths of the many damaged characters in Fidelma’s world. While their stories, in and of themselves, are worthy to be told, there is no transitioning. It’s as if these characters are in a musical, suddenly bursting into song. Three-fourths of the way through the book, after I thought these stories had ended and I could settle into Fidelma’s present-day story, another character arrived and—right before his departure from the narrative— he told his own lengthy tale. It felt, once again, contrived.
While the title is intriguing, referencing a powerful art installation commemorating the deaths of children during the siege of Sarajevo, it doesn’t fit what’s in the pages. But perhaps commemoration is all O’Brien was going for, a worthy enough goal: I just didn’t connect with it.
April 19, 2019
This book is a beautifully written mess. (Or it could just be me and my current lack of focus). O'Brien explores the impact of an evil man on a woman who is drawn into his seductive charm. I kept losing track of the scattered narrative. I listened to the audiobook, read by one of my favorite narrators, Juliet Stevenson, and I was constantly rewinding. This novel contains bursts of brilliance but just didn't coalesce for me.
July 29, 2024
They saw the shells of burnt houses, a gutted landscape, marching frightened families, a boy on a pile of rags calling a name and behind the bars of a concentration camp, skeletal young men staring out in gaunt and hopeless despair.
Embora pareça uma imagem recorrente da Segunda Guerra Mundial, na verdade, esta pertence à Guerra da Bósnia, que se desenrolou entre 1992 e 1995.
Esta leitura não poderia vir mais a calhar no ano em que Radovan Karadzic viu a sua pena ser prolongada de 40 anos para prisão perpétua, pelo Tribunal Penal de Haia, por crimes de guerra, e também no mês em que o Nobel da Literatura foi atribuído a Peter Hadke, um autêntico revisionista deste conflito. Não tem a pujança de outras obras que já li sobre a Guerra dos Balcãs, mas vejo-a como algo complementar, que lhes acrescenta algo mais, porque apresenta uma história ficcionada sobre os 12 anos em que o Carniceiro dos Balcãs andou fugido à justiça, fazendo-se passar por curandeiro. Apesar de apreciar a ambição do livro e a escrita aprimorada de Edna O'Brien, a ingenuidade da protagonista, Fidelma, não é totalmente verosímil e é claramente usada para fazer avançar um enredo que não faz muito sentido em alguns pontos. E ainda que Fidelma se cruze com personagens tão ou mais sofridas do que ela, parece-me que esse percurso serve de pretexto para abordar todos os horrores que possamos imaginar, desde o suicídio ao abandono de cães, passando pelos refugiados e pela mutilação genital feminina. É, porém, um livro importante, que merece ser lido.
Embora pareça uma imagem recorrente da Segunda Guerra Mundial, na verdade, esta pertence à Guerra da Bósnia, que se desenrolou entre 1992 e 1995.
Esta leitura não poderia vir mais a calhar no ano em que Radovan Karadzic viu a sua pena ser prolongada de 40 anos para prisão perpétua, pelo Tribunal Penal de Haia, por crimes de guerra, e também no mês em que o Nobel da Literatura foi atribuído a Peter Hadke, um autêntico revisionista deste conflito. Não tem a pujança de outras obras que já li sobre a Guerra dos Balcãs, mas vejo-a como algo complementar, que lhes acrescenta algo mais, porque apresenta uma história ficcionada sobre os 12 anos em que o Carniceiro dos Balcãs andou fugido à justiça, fazendo-se passar por curandeiro. Apesar de apreciar a ambição do livro e a escrita aprimorada de Edna O'Brien, a ingenuidade da protagonista, Fidelma, não é totalmente verosímil e é claramente usada para fazer avançar um enredo que não faz muito sentido em alguns pontos. E ainda que Fidelma se cruze com personagens tão ou mais sofridas do que ela, parece-me que esse percurso serve de pretexto para abordar todos os horrores que possamos imaginar, desde o suicídio ao abandono de cães, passando pelos refugiados e pela mutilação genital feminina. É, porém, um livro importante, que merece ser lido.
December 18, 2015
Edna O’Brien tackles some tough problems. One, she tries to make sense of the modern world. She does a great job –as she has in the past—in showing the Ireland she knew as bigoted, small, and repressive. (I read her aurobiography last year, The Country Girl and enjoyed it.) In this novel, she creates an almost clichéd cast of characters: the unsatisfied middle aged house wife, the boozy and friendly publican. There’s no whore with a heart of gold, but there is a nun with a heart of gold. Now there’s a switch.
Basically it’s about a Fidelma who fall in love with a military leader in disguise who has committed many atrocities, including in Sarajevo. (I think Wuthering Heights may be to blame for more bad novels that we could ever count.) He is captured. She is brutalized in an unforgiving way by enemies. (The rape by use of a crow bar not only is disturbing but also unbelievable. How could she have survived this violence since the reason was to rid her of her “love child?” Certainly it would have killed her.)
She then goes to London where she takes on menial jobs and meets some mighty fine folks and some bullies, too. She also works on a grey hound rescue farm. Then she attends the trial of her lover.
None of this matters much, but then she begins to get into her real theme: the problem of evil. And truth be told, Ms. O’Brien cannot handle the evil. She asks “Vlad,” “Was your essential nature always evil?” Thus she posits the idea that people are born good or bad, i.e. The Anne Frank Syndrome. She then confuses the issue by then asking if he has “chosen” the wrong part, allying him with a Satanic reasoning.
But gloriously it all disappears into a riotous version Midsuummer Night’s Dream back in London with that wacky bunch of immigrants and displaced persons she was hanging with, including a child, “Misteltoe,” who would have played several years ago by Quvenzhané Wallis. See, if we can make sense of that plot… .Ugh.
All in all, there are too many dream sequences, shifts of narrative, awkward transitions and dialogue to satisfy any serious reader. Or any reader for that matter. There’s just too much, “I could not go home until I could come home to myself” self-helpy clap trap sprinkled in the book, especially at the end.
Basically it’s about a Fidelma who fall in love with a military leader in disguise who has committed many atrocities, including in Sarajevo. (I think Wuthering Heights may be to blame for more bad novels that we could ever count.) He is captured. She is brutalized in an unforgiving way by enemies. (The rape by use of a crow bar not only is disturbing but also unbelievable. How could she have survived this violence since the reason was to rid her of her “love child?” Certainly it would have killed her.)
She then goes to London where she takes on menial jobs and meets some mighty fine folks and some bullies, too. She also works on a grey hound rescue farm. Then she attends the trial of her lover.
None of this matters much, but then she begins to get into her real theme: the problem of evil. And truth be told, Ms. O’Brien cannot handle the evil. She asks “Vlad,” “Was your essential nature always evil?” Thus she posits the idea that people are born good or bad, i.e. The Anne Frank Syndrome. She then confuses the issue by then asking if he has “chosen” the wrong part, allying him with a Satanic reasoning.
But gloriously it all disappears into a riotous version Midsuummer Night’s Dream back in London with that wacky bunch of immigrants and displaced persons she was hanging with, including a child, “Misteltoe,” who would have played several years ago by Quvenzhané Wallis. See, if we can make sense of that plot… .Ugh.
All in all, there are too many dream sequences, shifts of narrative, awkward transitions and dialogue to satisfy any serious reader. Or any reader for that matter. There’s just too much, “I could not go home until I could come home to myself” self-helpy clap trap sprinkled in the book, especially at the end.
May 5, 2021
Eu posso explicar... Sei que a Edna O'Brien tem excelentes críticas e tal... A premissa deste livro é, de facto, muito boa: o que acontece quando uma mulher se envolve, sem saber, com um temível criminoso de guerra? Algumas cenas são de um realismo assombroso e o livro bem vale por elas. O episódio trágico e escabroso de que Fidelma é vítima é de suster a respiração. Outras cenas, porém, parecem não encaixar no todo. Há personagens a mais, sem qualquer interesse, papel ou desenvolvimento. Parecem metidos à força para preenchimento de requisitos, que têm a ver com um ideal de universalidade e de solidariedade entre povos.
Tive pena. Ainda assim, gostei da escrita e quero ler mais da autora.
Tive pena. Ainda assim, gostei da escrita e quero ler mais da autora.
December 1, 2015
My View:
On the menu tonight; contemporary fiction deconstructed! What an interesting way to present a story! There are multiple points of views - the roll call includes the voices of individual characters and of the disenfranchised, the victims and survivors of many acts of atrocities in many regions and finally we hear the true voice of perpetrator when being held to account for his actions. The pace is erratic – unsettling but eventually compelling. Violence, love and compassion share the pages. This is not an easy read, this is a necessary read.
This is a very powerful and moving story of manipulation – it is human nature to expect the best of someone and to trust – Dr Vlad is artful in his ability to say what “you want to hear” and is thus easily accepted into his new community, his true nature bubbles under the surface of his deceit.
Edna O’Brien portrays Fidelma’s desire for a child and lover is heartbreaking and so sad. Her downfall is diabolical and so horrendous, her recovery, slow and painful.
This narrative pricks at our conscience and in particular serves to remind us of the notorious siege of Sarajevo where 11,541 innocent were slaughtered in the name of war and ethnic cleansing. This is but one atrocity, a recount of one of incident, confined to one time and place but serves to remind us of the global evil that thrives in our world today. Our conscience needs pricking, our compassion needs this reminder, thank you Edna O’Brien.
Foreword: “On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of the start of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in rows along the eight hundred metres of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for every Sarajaven killed during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred and forty-three small chairs represented the children killed by snipers and heavy artillery fired from the surrounding mountains.
On the menu tonight; contemporary fiction deconstructed! What an interesting way to present a story! There are multiple points of views - the roll call includes the voices of individual characters and of the disenfranchised, the victims and survivors of many acts of atrocities in many regions and finally we hear the true voice of perpetrator when being held to account for his actions. The pace is erratic – unsettling but eventually compelling. Violence, love and compassion share the pages. This is not an easy read, this is a necessary read.
This is a very powerful and moving story of manipulation – it is human nature to expect the best of someone and to trust – Dr Vlad is artful in his ability to say what “you want to hear” and is thus easily accepted into his new community, his true nature bubbles under the surface of his deceit.
Edna O’Brien portrays Fidelma’s desire for a child and lover is heartbreaking and so sad. Her downfall is diabolical and so horrendous, her recovery, slow and painful.
This narrative pricks at our conscience and in particular serves to remind us of the notorious siege of Sarajevo where 11,541 innocent were slaughtered in the name of war and ethnic cleansing. This is but one atrocity, a recount of one of incident, confined to one time and place but serves to remind us of the global evil that thrives in our world today. Our conscience needs pricking, our compassion needs this reminder, thank you Edna O’Brien.
Foreword: “On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of the start of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in rows along the eight hundred metres of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for every Sarajaven killed during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred and forty-three small chairs represented the children killed by snipers and heavy artillery fired from the surrounding mountains.
August 28, 2016
3.5 stars
Wow this is a tough one to rate. At 15% I almost abandoned this. Then I saw in another readers review that Juliet Stevenson was the audiobook narrator. As she is my favorite female narrator I decided to give the audio a go. I have seen several reviews that comment on the brutality of this and it is horribly brutal but that isn't why I was having problems. This reads (especially in the beginning) like a series of short stories or vignettes. The prose is breathtaking I had to rewind several times to just hear sentences again, which is not something I normally do. I think this was a really creative idea and beautifully written but something is missing. I just didn't quite come together in the end. And I will absolutely never look at a crow bar the same way! The audio is totally worth listening to just to hear Juliet read the sentences.
Wow this is a tough one to rate. At 15% I almost abandoned this. Then I saw in another readers review that Juliet Stevenson was the audiobook narrator. As she is my favorite female narrator I decided to give the audio a go. I have seen several reviews that comment on the brutality of this and it is horribly brutal but that isn't why I was having problems. This reads (especially in the beginning) like a series of short stories or vignettes. The prose is breathtaking I had to rewind several times to just hear sentences again, which is not something I normally do. I think this was a really creative idea and beautifully written but something is missing. I just didn't quite come together in the end. And I will absolutely never look at a crow bar the same way! The audio is totally worth listening to just to hear Juliet read the sentences.
April 17, 2016
Edna O'Brien's haunting new novel, her first in 10 years, draws its title from its epigraph: “On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the start of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in rows along the 800 meters of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for every Sarajevan killed during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred and forty-three small chairs represented the children killed by snipers and the heavy artillery fired from the surrounding mountains.” When holistic healer, Vladimir Dragan, arrives in the provincial Irish village of Cloonoila, no one would guess that the charismatic, bearded stranger is in fact the Balkan War criminal known as The Beast of Bosnia (a character inspired by Radovan Karadzic), not even Fidelma, the town beauty who, naïve and in a lonely marriage, dreams of having his child. Fidelma's "walk on part" in the life of Dr. Vlad then takes a dark and unexpected turn, setting the second half of the novel in motion, and setting Fidelma's resilience at odds against the horrific evils of our time (which is the real subject of O'Brien's novel: Fidelma, victim or heroine?). With The Little Red Chairs, Edna O'Brien has proven again she is truly gifted writer in posing the questions, who amongst us would recognize the true face of evil in our lives, and how then, would one reconcile one’s own complicity in that evil?
August 13, 2016
I waited three months on my library's waiting list to get this book and I am glad I did. I found it to be a very moving story about people who have lost everything and must find a new home and a new way to survive. It reminded me very much of Louise Erdrich's LaRose where people who have experienced tragedy must find a way to make a new life.
Fidelma McBride is a poor young woman who marries up. The exchange of a new position in life for marriage is not a satisfactory one for her. She falls under the spell of the new holistic doctor, Dr. Vlad. She makes some decisions that seems to work out for her but then go horribly, terribly wrong. It turns out Dr. Vlad is in hiding from a truly reprehensible past.
Horrific crimes are committed against her and the town turns against her. She relocates to London to deal with refugees and make a new home.
There are several points that bothered me:
1. Why did she go with the men when they came for her?
2. The ending with her husband, Jack.
I thought it was an amazing story about refugees and I sit here watching the Refugee Team at the Olympics, I am amazed at their stories and their resilience.
Fidelma McBride is a poor young woman who marries up. The exchange of a new position in life for marriage is not a satisfactory one for her. She falls under the spell of the new holistic doctor, Dr. Vlad. She makes some decisions that seems to work out for her but then go horribly, terribly wrong. It turns out Dr. Vlad is in hiding from a truly reprehensible past.
Horrific crimes are committed against her and the town turns against her. She relocates to London to deal with refugees and make a new home.
There are several points that bothered me:
1. Why did she go with the men when they came for her?
2. The ending with her husband, Jack.
I thought it was an amazing story about refugees and I sit here watching the Refugee Team at the Olympics, I am amazed at their stories and their resilience.
May 20, 2017
The Little Red Chairs begins in a small Irish village where Fidelma, a restless beauty, falls in love with the mysterious stranger, Vlad, a self-proclaimed "healer" who appears seemingly from nowhere. Fidelma, dissatisfied with her life and her marriage, begs Vlad to help her conceive a child. After she becomes pregnant, it is discovered that Vlad is an infamous war criminal (from the Bosnian war). She is brutally tortured by his enemies and rejected by her husband and the town in which she has lived her entire life.
Fidelma goes to London where she attempts to begin a new life. She feels like a double outsider: amongst the English because she is Irish and even with the other refugees, where she feels contaminated by her connection to Vlad.
O'Brien's writing is a gorgeous as ever. I first discovered her 30 years ago (with the wonderful The Country Girls) and her writing remains as lush and evocative as ever. Some of her themes remain the same as well-and remain fresh and interesting. The narrow-mindedness of small communities (no romanticism here) and the question of whether innocence is over-rated and in fact a dangerous state are major themes in this book. The town's-and Fidelma's-naivete leave them exceptionally vulnerable to the malevolent Vlad. Fidelma's awakening and maturity are gained at a horrible cost.
The epigraph to the novel explains the title: “On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the start of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in rows along the 800 meters of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for every Sarajevan killed during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred and forty-three small chairs represented the children killed by snipers and the heavy artillery fired from the surrounding mountains.” We know from the beginning that this is a tragic novel. The tragedy is expressed obliquely through one of Vlad's latest, almost inadvertent victims, Fidelma.
The book contains several scenes of graphic and disturbing violence. I found them difficult to read although necessary to the story. I felt that O'Brien's writing faltered in the first of these scenes and it was difficult to follow but that may be because she was reproducing the trauma and confusion of the victim.
I usually don't like descriptive passages of the environment (be it urban or nature) but O'Brien's were not only vividly depicted but seemed necessary insights into the characters very being.
Altogether a fascinating, beautifully written and disturbing work. Well worth reading.
Fidelma goes to London where she attempts to begin a new life. She feels like a double outsider: amongst the English because she is Irish and even with the other refugees, where she feels contaminated by her connection to Vlad.
O'Brien's writing is a gorgeous as ever. I first discovered her 30 years ago (with the wonderful The Country Girls) and her writing remains as lush and evocative as ever. Some of her themes remain the same as well-and remain fresh and interesting. The narrow-mindedness of small communities (no romanticism here) and the question of whether innocence is over-rated and in fact a dangerous state are major themes in this book. The town's-and Fidelma's-naivete leave them exceptionally vulnerable to the malevolent Vlad. Fidelma's awakening and maturity are gained at a horrible cost.
The epigraph to the novel explains the title: “On the 6th of April 2012, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the start of the siege of Sarajevo by Bosnian Serb forces, 11,541 red chairs were laid out in rows along the 800 meters of the Sarajevo high street. One empty chair for every Sarajevan killed during the 1,425 days of siege. Six hundred and forty-three small chairs represented the children killed by snipers and the heavy artillery fired from the surrounding mountains.” We know from the beginning that this is a tragic novel. The tragedy is expressed obliquely through one of Vlad's latest, almost inadvertent victims, Fidelma.
The book contains several scenes of graphic and disturbing violence. I found them difficult to read although necessary to the story. I felt that O'Brien's writing faltered in the first of these scenes and it was difficult to follow but that may be because she was reproducing the trauma and confusion of the victim.
I usually don't like descriptive passages of the environment (be it urban or nature) but O'Brien's were not only vividly depicted but seemed necessary insights into the characters very being.
Altogether a fascinating, beautifully written and disturbing work. Well worth reading.
February 6, 2017
It's tough to say everything I want to about this novel, because there's so much here worth talking about that I don't even know where to begin or how to condense my thoughts on this book into a goodreads-sized post. As much as I hate to do this, I think I'll link to my reading journal where I just begin to scratch its surface. No spoilers, and I will not divulge any more than is on the dustjacket blurb.
I will say that despite a few issues with this novel, I was completely engrossed in this book, which isn't really one story but many, and it is most certainly a book I would recommend without hesitation. It's also one where I don't understand the low reader ratings, but to each his/her own.
Here's the link.
I will say that despite a few issues with this novel, I was completely engrossed in this book, which isn't really one story but many, and it is most certainly a book I would recommend without hesitation. It's also one where I don't understand the low reader ratings, but to each his/her own.
Here's the link.
November 10, 2016
Well, this book was disappointing. I have read several books set in the former Yugoslavia, all better than this book. (The Cellist of Sarajevo, The Tiger's Wife, People of the Book, etc.)
It was like the author couldn't decide what kind of book to write, so she combined seemingly disparate elements that really are disparate for a reason! The little red chairs set up in Sarajevo to commemorate the dead. A small town in Ireland with a gossip mill. Immigration and poverty. Single parenting. Abortion. A former war general responsible for thousands of deaths... turned small town witch doctor and sex therapist.
Wait, what?
Yeah.
It just didn't work for me. I read the entire thing and wish I hadn't.
And then there was this moment when the author is talking about a wealthy family in Sarajevo who only gets two cans of beans a week, but no firewood. First they burn their furniture and then they have to burn their books, including a first edition of The Iliad.
Ummmm....
This is the first book I've read because The Constant Readers were reading it. Hopefully I'll have a better experience next time.
It was like the author couldn't decide what kind of book to write, so she combined seemingly disparate elements that really are disparate for a reason! The little red chairs set up in Sarajevo to commemorate the dead. A small town in Ireland with a gossip mill. Immigration and poverty. Single parenting. Abortion. A former war general responsible for thousands of deaths... turned small town witch doctor and sex therapist.
Wait, what?
Yeah.
It just didn't work for me. I read the entire thing and wish I hadn't.
And then there was this moment when the author is talking about a wealthy family in Sarajevo who only gets two cans of beans a week, but no firewood. First they burn their furniture and then they have to burn their books, including a first edition of The Iliad.
Ummmm....
This is the first book I've read because The Constant Readers were reading it. Hopefully I'll have a better experience next time.
October 18, 2015
The Little Red Chairs tells the story of Fidelma, an inhabitant of an Irish village who completely falls for a stranger, Dr Vlad. Fidelma starts an affair with him and even wants to have his child. There's something mysterious about Dr Vlad from the beginning and it is soon reveiled that he is a war criminal and Europe's most wanted man. He is discovered and captured quite soon. Things would have progressed quite differently for Fidelma if she wasn't pregnant with his child. She is tortured by his enemies and starts a new life in London among refugees. Fidelma is confronted with their stories - and also with people who's life Dr Vlad destroyed.
Dr Vlad is obviously based on Radovan Karadzic who is accused to have ordered the Srebrenica massacre. Edna O'Brien does a very good job at describing how demonic he is, how he neglects any bad faith. Her description of Fidelma is excellent as well. I pretty much disliked this character because of her naivite and her passiveness but in the end I reconciled myself a bit with her.
I enjoyed the many different perspectives from which the book is told. There are very many characters for a novel that short but the book doesn't feel crowded and none of the characters seemed too flat.
(I received a free digital copy via Netgalley/Faber & Faber. Thanks for the opportunity!)
Dr Vlad is obviously based on Radovan Karadzic who is accused to have ordered the Srebrenica massacre. Edna O'Brien does a very good job at describing how demonic he is, how he neglects any bad faith. Her description of Fidelma is excellent as well. I pretty much disliked this character because of her naivite and her passiveness but in the end I reconciled myself a bit with her.
I enjoyed the many different perspectives from which the book is told. There are very many characters for a novel that short but the book doesn't feel crowded and none of the characters seemed too flat.
(I received a free digital copy via Netgalley/Faber & Faber. Thanks for the opportunity!)
September 20, 2022
A Sátán ezúttal nem Moszkvába érkezett – bár egyes források szerint onnan el se ment -, hanem Írországba. Most épp Dr. Vladnak hívják, de szokás szerint elbűvölő: elegáns, művelt, udvarias, és úgy masszírozza ki a görcsöt a kisvárosi hölgyek derekából, mint egy kisisten. Mindenkit megbabonáz, mindenki szereti, mert hát az ördög már csak ilyen. A díszzsebkendő olyan nettül kandikál ki az öltöny mellzsebéből, hogy Kötter Tamás belesápad, és ha saját verseit szavalja gitárkísérettel, elolvad a jónép.
De igazából nem is Dr. Vlad a főszereplő. Hanem Fidelma, akit a bűvkörébe von. Mert igazából az ördög nem is annyira érdekes. Sőt: unalmas. Mert bele van zárva a saját hazugságaiba, azokat szajkózza szüntelen, amíg végül el nem hiszi az összeset. Ha a tetszetős külső mögé nézünk, a kényszeresség monotóniáját látjuk. De az áldozat, Fidelma, más tészta. Ő képes változni, sokkal inkább érdemes a figyelmünkre, mint a kísértő. Ő az, aki Dr. Vlad hatására lemerül egy olyan világba, amiről addig, a nyugodalmas ír kisvárosiságban fogalma sem volt. Megismeri azokat, akiket ide-oda dobált a történelem, egyfajta alvilági alászállásban van része, aminek hatására lehetősége lesz új emberré válni.
Nagyon szép, nagyon érzékeny történet. Ha van tanulsága, hát az, hogy nem a gonosz a lényeg. Nem kell mindig az ő motivációit kutatni, ha kérdezzük, úgyis csak hazudik, összehord hetet-havat arról, hogy ő csak visszaütött, mi több, nem is ütött meg senkit, csak belerohantak a védekezőn felemelt öklébe, aztán színtiszta provokációból meghaltak, belehulltak a saját maguk által ásott gödörbe, persze csak miután aljas módon megkínozták magukat, kezüket pedig szögesdróttal hátrakötözték. Nem, a gonosszal nem kell foglalkozni.
Aki méltó a figyelmünkre, az az áldozat. Vele kell törődnünk.
(Megjegyz.: nem szoktam más olvasói véleményekre reflektálni, még közvetve se, de valamit azért megjegyeznék. Szerintem ez a könyv azért hív elő negatív értékeléseket, mert szándékosan keresztbe tesz az olvasói elvárásoknak. Ahogy elkezdi a démoni Dr. Vlad érkezésével, abba a hitbe ringat minket, hogy itt egyfajta variációt látunk majd a Mario és a varázslóra: adott egy gonosz, aki megbűvöli a közösséget. De O'Brien csak addig írja ezt a sztorit, amíg el nem hisszük, hogy akár ezt is meg tudná írni. Aztán rövidre zárja az egészet, és elkezd azzal foglalkozni, ami valóban érdekli: az egyéni szenvedéstörténetek végtelenségével. Ez egy tudatos - és bátor - döntés, aminek fontos üzenete van. Az, hogy a gonoszt érdemén felül tiszteljük meg, amikor folyton a főszereplő pozíciójába helyezzük. A popkultúra a Nesbo-krimiktől a Marvel mozikig óriási hype-ot kerít az antagonista köré, mintha körülötte forogna minden. Pedig nem a vihar a lényeg, amit támaszt. Hanem azok, akiken a vihar átcsapott.)
De igazából nem is Dr. Vlad a főszereplő. Hanem Fidelma, akit a bűvkörébe von. Mert igazából az ördög nem is annyira érdekes. Sőt: unalmas. Mert bele van zárva a saját hazugságaiba, azokat szajkózza szüntelen, amíg végül el nem hiszi az összeset. Ha a tetszetős külső mögé nézünk, a kényszeresség monotóniáját látjuk. De az áldozat, Fidelma, más tészta. Ő képes változni, sokkal inkább érdemes a figyelmünkre, mint a kísértő. Ő az, aki Dr. Vlad hatására lemerül egy olyan világba, amiről addig, a nyugodalmas ír kisvárosiságban fogalma sem volt. Megismeri azokat, akiket ide-oda dobált a történelem, egyfajta alvilági alászállásban van része, aminek hatására lehetősége lesz új emberré válni.
Nagyon szép, nagyon érzékeny történet. Ha van tanulsága, hát az, hogy nem a gonosz a lényeg. Nem kell mindig az ő motivációit kutatni, ha kérdezzük, úgyis csak hazudik, összehord hetet-havat arról, hogy ő csak visszaütött, mi több, nem is ütött meg senkit, csak belerohantak a védekezőn felemelt öklébe, aztán színtiszta provokációból meghaltak, belehulltak a saját maguk által ásott gödörbe, persze csak miután aljas módon megkínozták magukat, kezüket pedig szögesdróttal hátrakötözték. Nem, a gonosszal nem kell foglalkozni.
Aki méltó a figyelmünkre, az az áldozat. Vele kell törődnünk.
(Megjegyz.: nem szoktam más olvasói véleményekre reflektálni, még közvetve se, de valamit azért megjegyeznék. Szerintem ez a könyv azért hív elő negatív értékeléseket, mert szándékosan keresztbe tesz az olvasói elvárásoknak. Ahogy elkezdi a démoni Dr. Vlad érkezésével, abba a hitbe ringat minket, hogy itt egyfajta variációt látunk majd a Mario és a varázslóra: adott egy gonosz, aki megbűvöli a közösséget. De O'Brien csak addig írja ezt a sztorit, amíg el nem hisszük, hogy akár ezt is meg tudná írni. Aztán rövidre zárja az egészet, és elkezd azzal foglalkozni, ami valóban érdekli: az egyéni szenvedéstörténetek végtelenségével. Ez egy tudatos - és bátor - döntés, aminek fontos üzenete van. Az, hogy a gonoszt érdemén felül tiszteljük meg, amikor folyton a főszereplő pozíciójába helyezzük. A popkultúra a Nesbo-krimiktől a Marvel mozikig óriási hype-ot kerít az antagonista köré, mintha körülötte forogna minden. Pedig nem a vihar a lényeg, amit támaszt. Hanem azok, akiken a vihar átcsapott.)
September 27, 2023
This book is a mess the way dreams are a mess. Scenes don’t hang together. You can’t necessarily tell dreams in a linear way, remembering who every character is. Dreams are fine when you’re asleep, but when you’re awake, they don’t always make great stories.
I kept reading rather than abandoning this book because the writing is good. And then when I finally realized it was more like a bunch of pieces, many gleaned from research, that did not make a story, I only had 2 hours left to read, so, hoping it would somehow congeal in a story, I finished.
I get what Edna O’Brien was after—comparing a brutal genocidal war and the actions of a war criminal to a dream—to the madness of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, but because of the fractured structure of bits that don’t build plot or tension, I had no feelings. I mostly just wanted to finish the book and move on.
I kept reading rather than abandoning this book because the writing is good. And then when I finally realized it was more like a bunch of pieces, many gleaned from research, that did not make a story, I only had 2 hours left to read, so, hoping it would somehow congeal in a story, I finished.
I get what Edna O’Brien was after—comparing a brutal genocidal war and the actions of a war criminal to a dream—to the madness of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, but because of the fractured structure of bits that don’t build plot or tension, I had no feelings. I mostly just wanted to finish the book and move on.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,728 reviews