This book read like a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition for entrepreneurship fanboys. Sure, you enjoy the vignettes, on how various entrepreneurs from different backgrounds and abilities, observe, er, "master" these 6 "essential skills" to become creators extraordinaire. Pretty impressive stuff...gets the heart rate up. Then you put down the book, and say, "Wait, how much of thees vignettes are airbrushed and how much is the real deal?"
Unfortunately—and perhaps as her many stories of the success of Elizaebth Holmes indicate—I couldn't help but leave feeling that this is more a story of how entrepreneurs want to portray themselves, than a story of what attributes entrepreneurs actually exhibit.
My issue is with her approach—she interviewed 200 "creators" to figure out what secret sauce they share. The problem with that is folks have a tendency to ascribe lofty virtues to their success—and when they're asked to discuss their success they tend to give a narrative that conforms to the "narrative of entrepreneurial success" that is already out there. In other words, the interview is not actually determining their skills...it's uncovering what skills the creators believe they have or want others to believe they have.
As a result, we end up with a book of entrepreneurial fanboy fantasy. "Fail wisely". "Network Minds", "Find the Gap." All these are descriptors that have become cliches for entrepreneurial success...which is no surprise, since she is asking successful entrepreneurs to give her a narrative of why they're successful!
Contrast this with Grit. If all Angela Duckworth did was ask successful people, "Do you have grit?", I'm sure 100% would say "Yes." But she doesn't do that. Instead she develops a test for grit (and references other tests of grit) and cites outcomes from that test. In other words, she digs deeper than the narrative, and delves into the actual attribute and whether someone possesses it or not. Wilkinson does no such thing. She just takes the creators at their word.
Which is all fine and dandy, I guess, if she at least told us, how do the entrepreneurs achieve these attributes? After all, she has told us that these are just regular folks, like you and me, who just happened to develop this toolkit. I, too, want to be great—what do you suggest I do Wilkinson to develop the skills of greatness?
Unfortunately, she never actually shows us how the creators developed these skills, preferring instead to use certain generalities like "Creators use certain principles to gift goods effectively." It also doesn't help that she references stories from their childhood that hint at their impending greatness (Elon Musk and his video game developed at the age of 10, for example). In other words, while telling the audience, "You can develop these skills too", she seems to be showing us that the truly great creators seem to basically have them innately (or from a very early age). Ok, thanks Wilkinson—I'll just fly the OODA Loop right back to my cubicle next to the copy machine . . .
Contrast this with "Made in America" by Sam Walton where you see a portrait of a guy who had many motivations—some pedestrian such as choosing to live in Bentonville because he liked to duck hunt (not because he looked at a US map and said, "Voila, guys outside big cities are being ignored by US department stores. I'll move to Bentonville and fix it. I have "Found the Gap"!). You read the story of a man who simply wanted to make some money running a store, but through continuous improvement and shameless copying of good ideas, built the Fortune 1 company. For me, that is a more compelling story—he gives us the behind the scenes peak of how it all came together.
Unfortunately, Wilkinson never takes us any deeper than that glossy airbrushed image of entrepreneurial greatness. And it leaves me feeling empty, inadequate, and wanting my time and money back.
Disappointing read.