This book feels full of surprises. After the first two books it wasn’t really clear what narrative route Simmons was going to take with this one, and where it went is not where I expected. There are two character POVs or storylines that we follow, and each is a story about searching for something and running from something, too. The protagonists’ storyline, for lack of a better term, feels like a stereotypical action-adventure fantasy story in many ways. There is an anarchic quality to it, a sense of going on a journey or quest whose destination is still unclear. It is episodic in that way, and each little set-piece is compelling and fun. The other characters’ story, to call them antagonists would be incorrect but not entirely, feels more like a dystopian sci-fi story mixed with a military-procedural. It has sharp edges that leave deep wounds of uncertainty but is pervaded by a sense of stoicism and mission that make it feel constantly tense. This blending was fun, and the overall story reads really quickly and comfortably as you move across viewpoints, it definitely doesn’t feel like it carries the weight of its page count.
The characters feel genuine and engaging, even if not particularly interesting. Not the protagonists, at least. They feel like they are slowly being unpeeled, and as we work through their husks they are noble and funny and so on, their humanity and emotion feel real, but they aren’t particularly complicated, at least not yet. The “antagonist,” however, is much more intriguing. He feels like he is constantly at war with himself, and it is great. Simmons has done such intense world-building and philosophical musing in the previous books, that all serves as a backdrop for this story. It isn’t until the end that we really start to wrestle directly with some of the bigger ideas or themes that Simmons had been exploring previously. Up until that point there is, as I mention, an almost generic fantasy-adventure vibe. But since that is playing out against a backdrop of deep social, political, technological, and religious unrest it becomes inherently interesting. We get to explore all new parts of the lush world that Simmons has imagined, and the narrative ease really exploits the hard work done in previous books to create a distinct sense of space and to remind the reader that there are a number of heavy ideas about faith, power, free will, autonomy, and more that are just under the surface of this seemingly generic story. That all comes crashing to the forefront in the final quarter of the book, setting up what I imagine to be a much headier final book in the series.
My only real complaint, on a structural level, is that one main protagonist, this young girl we know to eventually become a messiah-like figure, feels too narratively convenient. She just happens to remember things or have visions when it is useful to move the plot forward, and she only intuits or remembers enough to point in a direction but not answer any actual nagging questions. There is an in-story justification for it, which is fine, it doesn’t feel antagonist to the story, but it does just feel a little too convenient. It is like a bunch of little mini deus ex machina-s, totally breaking the flow of the story to drop an unexpected vision or memory which deepens the lore and changes the characters’ trajectories. So much of the deep thinking of the story and the world is so meticulous that it feels a little sloppy, in comparison. Not enough to really bother me, but enough to be very noticeable as I was reading and always pull me a little bit out of the story. This is a minor gripe, though. Overall, the story is aiming at a much larger meta-story, something that needs the two books that preceded it and the near three centuries of in-world history between the second book and this one, in order to try and encompass it. It is very clearly setting up for the next book and leaves far more open-ended and unsolved than it answers and yet it also does feel like it has a proper narrative arc and is a satisfying read on its own.