In its vast scope, this book presents the continuum of Western philosophy. Ranging from ancient Greece to nineteenth-century America, it traces the history of our civilization through the seminal works of its most influential thinkers. Each philosopher in this volume made intellectual history; each created a revolution in ideas; each reaffirmed man’s view of himself as a sentient being capable of creating order out of the baffling contradictions of existence. And the most powerful reflections and speculations of each are represented here. Plato: Apology, Crito and the Death of Socrates, from Phado Aristotle: Poetics St. Ansem: The ontological Proof of St. Ansem, from Proslogium St. Thomas Aquinas: St. Thomas’ Proofs of God’s Existence, from the Summa Theologica René Descartes: Meditations on the First Philosophy David Hume: An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism William James: The Will to Believe
Robert Paul Wolff was an American political philosopher and professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Wolff has written widely on topics in political philosophy, including Marxism, tolerance (against liberalism and in favor of anarchism), political justification, and democracy.
This was my text in Freshman Philosophy in college. It was so good it gave me the impetus to take two more courses in Philosophy when I didn't even have to.
Reading philosophy is like a literary mind f*ck. Despite how 'wordy' it is, it's not polite, it's undercover shady come in the guise of confusing sentences and sentiments that make you doubt your intelligence. That said, I'd still recommend everyone give it a go. The commentary from Wolff helps to give you a broad understanding of each philosophers stance. And in this collection you have some pretty essential figures from the school of thought; Plato, Aristotle, St. Anselm, St. Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Hume, Kant, John Stuart Mill and William James. I myself appreciate but have no patience for Aristotle, St. Thomas and St. Anselm, respect their views but My God, they're the kind of writers that put me to sleep while reading. Ugh. Plato on the other hand and Apology, Crito and Death of Socrates... I love and I've also read before and if this title is too much I'd highly recommend reading on it's own The Trial and Death of Socrates. In regards to the others, I love the commentators note/forewarning about Hume "Hume was a brilliant writer as well as profound philosopher. You will find him much easier to understand than Descartes or Anselm or Aquinas. Do not be deceived! Behind these facile phrases and lucid examples lies the most powerful attack ever launched on man's cherished beliefs. Be on your guard!" I personally think philosophy is a great way for anyone to challenge themselves and really discover who they are and why they think and feel the way they do and then have the satisfaction of knowing that they can stand behind what they say to anyone because they've challenged the greatest critic anyone can have in life... themselves. Take me, I love Hume, and he was known as the greatest atheist ever, and his opinion was "Why do men believe what they cannot rationally know?" My answer, Faith, God, Hope and Prayer. Thanks Hume!
Massive writing (some 600 pages) for such a small, almost pocket-sized book. Wolf edits and compiles "Ten Great Works" from some of the big names in ancient, medieval, and modern philosophy. I only read the Hume section, and cannot comment on the rest of the book.
The type was small and lines were very close together, of course for maximum compactness. This made it hard to read (beyond the usual dense, technical writing you expect from works of philosophy ). The selection of philosophy was decent, as much as any philosophers from the usual three major eras of Western Philosophy can be; I assume the translation is fair. My problem with this book is the central question of Western Philosophy: "Why?" All joking aside, it does not make much sense to throw together ten works, no matter how important or reputable they are, unless they are meaningfully or ideologically or otherwise related and relevant. I cannot imagine a single professor teaching all or even most of the texts in this book in a single class. They are mostly full (unabridged) texts, and not really of much use for an intro class (although I read the Hume for an intro class), and they're too diverse for an advanced, topic-specific course. If it were an abbreviated anthology, I could see the point: short texts, a few pages of comment each to orient the reader, preferably with a few pictures and in an easy, readable font. What you have here is just what the title says: Ten (Random) Great Works of Philosophy.
I suspect a publisher just thought it would be a quick, easy buck to take a handful of texts in public domain, paste on a nice cover, and push the thing on universities knowing that there was some something for everyone (and the whole thing for no one). Good marketing, bad philosophy.
I don't have any background knowledge about philosophy, and I picked this up to begin studying philosophy. The parts detailing the history of philosophy are great but most of the content covers modern philosophy which can be a little tedious and the fonts used are too small to my liking.
I don’t know what compelled me to purchase this at a thrift store or to even consider reading it— I’d done my time with philosophy and was content to never read from Kant or Hume ever again, yet here we are. I will say, I annotated this more than I have any book the past year… so maybe it’s not the worst thing to have read it. Or maybe I just want you all to think I’m an intellectual. Only God knows.
I was reading this book while traveling in Greece, the birth place of philosophy. This book begins with the trial of Socrates. And I had the wonderful opportunity to visit Socrates' prison up on a mountain in Athens. It made it all the more interesting to read.
Despite having fun with the first few works of philosophy, I had trouble understanding Aristotle's "poetics". As I was finishing up the book mostly on the metro in my daily commute to work and back, I would often retract to earlier pages when I was reading.
I didn't read all of the passages but I was glad I knew some of the contemporary American philosophers from when I took a course on political philosophy in college.
The fifth century B.C. thinkers began to exercise their power of the mind: question were asked about the origin of reason, and our fundamental judgement of man's view of himself and world we live in. This book introduces nine great thinkers of Western philosophy from the ancient Greece until 19th century America.
It tells the history of thier famous works, and eye-opening theories reflecting upon the principle of their thought and action.
1) Apology; Plato 2) Crito; Plato 3) Poetics; Aristotle 4) Proslogium (selection); St. Anselm 5) The Summa Theologica (selection): Thomas Aquinas 6) Meditations on the First Philosophy; Descartes, Rene 7) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding; Hume, Davd 8) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics; Kant, Immanuel 9) Utilitarianism; Mill, John Stuart 10) The Will to Believe; James, William
I don't feel qualified to review this. It's a great introductory anthology, which can and should be enjoyed not only by philosophy aficionados, but by any intelligent being in the world. It's a work one can refer to over and over again, for pleasure or edification. It is worth revisiting whenever possible.