TL;DR - The last 100 pages of this book are very good. The problem is that the 650 pages before them are soul-crushingly terrible, full of a ridiculous amount of recapping previous books, Goodkind telling us things we already know, endless technobabble about prophecy that might as well be giberish, and an absolutely insane amout of repetition in the dialog. The ending does not redeem the rest of the book up to it. The vast majority of the action scenes that take place in this book are told to us after the fact by characters recounting what happened, rather than allowing us to experience them ourselves. Goodkind has a real problem with telling instead of showing here. It's like he's forgotten how to write action, or a compelling story, and substitutes recaps of his better work, and cheap descriptions of action scenes after the fact. It's a very lazy and mind-numbing book that I cannot recomend to anyone.
So, I figured I'm not reading anything at the moment, might as well knock out another Sword of Truth review. I have only read this book once before. I was so disgusted with Naked Empire when it first came out that I pretty much just stopped paying attention to Terry Goodkind and the Sword of Truth. Several years passed and I was surprised to find that Confessor was about to be realeased and that I had missed Chainfire and Phantom. I figured that since it was the last book of the series, I'd reread the entire series from the beginning, and finish off with the three that I hadn't read before. I remember liking this book when I first read it, but, looking back now, I think that my enjoyment of it was only in comparison with my utter hatred and loathing of Naked Empire, which I read for a second time immediately before picking it up. Reading through it now... yeah, not so great.
I'm going to do what I did with the last two Goodkind books and just post my notes, rather than waste even more of my time on this book.
12% done:
All right, I am a little over 80 pages in, and, well, there's a few things. First of all, What does Goodkind have against just telling us what the cause of the drama is outright? He has this annoying habit of dancing around the exact cause of drama, and just trying to build drama around the reader not knowing things that everyone in the scene clearly knows. It makes the drama feel forced with you withhold information like that. And Drama that feels forced does NOT feel dramatic.
Next, show, don't tell. There is nothing shown in this book so far. It is ALL told. We are told about the fight at the beginning where Richard was wounded. We are told about how Richard was healed. We are told about the blood beast and how dangerous it might be. We are told that Nicci inadvertently fed it some of Richard's blood. We are told that she removed the arrow with subtractive magic. We are told in excruciating detail how prophecy works (more on that later). We are told, in even MORE excruciating detail, how Richard's magic works. The one time we're actually shown something, in the remnants of Richard's men torn up by the blood beast, we've also got Nicci giving a running commentary on it, so we're shown what happened, BUT WE ARE ALSO TOLD. The sheer ineptitude that Goodkind is showing with this is staggering. Let me give you an example of what I mean.
All right, Nicci sits there and thinks, at great length, about how Richard's magic works on need, and how he is unable to consciously control it. This takes up about 7 pages. It's absolutely mind numbing, and I can't see a casual reader even bothering reading through it completely, instead skimming through to the end. First of all, WE ALREADY FREAKING KNOW!!! This is book 9. No one is going to pick up book 9 of a series without reading at least a few of the eight that came before it. This explanation is unnecessary, and redundant. Second, we are TOLD all of these things that we already know, rather than being SHOWN these things in practice. It makes it feel rather boring and long-winded, and like we're being lectured by the author. Think of this, instead. Richard and pals are soaking wet and freezing cold from the rain. Have him get the idea that, hey, maybe I can use magic to get a fire going to warm and dry us faster with magic. He tries to use magic to start a fire. He fumbles around, not really sure what he's doing, strains, trying to force it, and then gives up. He sighs, then grabs a flint and steel to do it the old fashioned way. This SHOWS us several things. First, it SHOWS us that Richard CAN sometimes use magic. It SHOWS us that he can't always get it to work. It SHOWS us that he's working on being able to figure it out. It SHOWS us that he doesn't know how it works, and that he can't force it. His sigh SHOWS us that he is frustrated with it, and his reaching for the flint SHOWS us that he has more trust in doing things the way everyone else does then than through magic, and that he sees the time spent trying as a waste, which then infers that he feels that magic in general is a waste. This little scene would be short and sweet, probably less than half a page, and it would impress upon us exactly what Richard's troubles with magic are without saying a single word about them, allowing us, as the readers, to imply all of these things from what we are shown. Which would you rather read? A seven page lecture on Richard's abilities and aptitude with magic, or a simple scene that shows you all of these things in a brief, but adequate manner without saying a single word beyond what was shown as explanation?
Next, I feel like a broken record bringing this up time and time again, but the freaking recaps man. Again. I have read the eight books that came before this one. I do not need 30 of the first 80 pages of this book devoted to telling me what happened in them. It's boring. I know already. I don't need to be reminded of every single event in the characters' lives before this point. And it's all told to us in a wall of text that is just a boring chore to read. Why? What a waste of time and effort to write that all out, and what a waste of time and effort to read it. And pretty much the other side of the recap coin is the repetition. Good god, man. You don't need to have people say the exact same things back and forth for seventeen years to get the point across. Generally, a reader only needs to be told something once. A conversation where the exact same things are brought up and explained away nine times is generally going to be skipped, or skimmed through by most readers, because no one fucking cares. No one wants to read that. You're wasting everyone's time with it. When you give an explanation of Cicadas in one chapter, for instance, you do not need to have another character in another location give the exact same explanation about Cicadas in the very next chapter. This is ridiculous. There is so much unnecessary dialog in this book that basically just repeats the exact same things over, and over, and over again. Who is this for, exactly? People too stupid to comprehend what you're talking about? Guess what, people like that are probably not going to be reading the book in the first place, dumbass.
Okay, what I feel is the worst aspect of this series BY FAR, is the technobabble explanations of prophecy. Goodkind goes on into excruciating detail for pages upon pages technobabbling about how prophecy works. And it's basically all giberish. It means nothing to anyone. It's wasted space in the story, where Goodkind tries to make people look smart by saying a lot of big, made up words in a meaningful way, as if it's important and shit, and he's not actually telling us anything of value in it. What could have been a very tense scene of Nathan frantically flipping through prophecy books, finding all of the blank sections and then finally coming to the realization that prophecy is being erased from existence was completely ruined by Nathan explaining that he did that after the fact, and then he and Anne having a long and boring conversation technobabbling about prophecy. You see what I mean about telling instead of showing? We are TOLD that Nathan flipped through these books, with a growing sense of unease and dread, instead of actually having him do it so taht we could see it ourselves, and feel the tension and building dread ourselves. This is an extremely lazy and incompetent way of telling a story. None of the action or emotion is shown to us as it's happening. It's told to us in a dry, boring way after the fact.
So, the whole Richard being the only one to remember Kahlan thing. Good god. What a shit show that is. Look, okay, I get what Goodkind is going for here. Richard is the only one that remembers her and he's constantly trying to prove that she exists to others. The problem is that it is drawn out to such ridiculous, tedious, and repetative length that it actually becomes a sort of parody of itself, rather than being the central point of tension and drama in the story. By the time I got 80 pages in, I'm sick of hearing about it. I'm bored to death, because that's all Richard talks about. He's not really DOING anything. All he's doing is having roundabout conversations with people that all are basically the exact same thing repeated to the point that it's like watching a dog chase its own tail. This is not the way to build tension and drama around a mystery. Again. SHOW, DON'T TELL. We are TOLD all of this. None of it is ever SHOWN to us. It's boring and tedious to read, because it just keeps repeating over, and over, and over again, without ever making any progress either way. Richard never comes close to convincing the others, and the others never come close to convincing him. What is the point of continuing to repeat it if no headway is ever made either way? A chess game ends at a stalemate for a reason. So should this. If you can't make any progress in it either way, quit bringing it up at length until you CAN make progress with it.
Gawd, I just filled up half of the Goodreads character allotment for reviews with my notes of the first 80 pages of 750 page book... Fuck.
70% done:
Okay, so, pacing. Every story has a tempo. It moves to a certain rhythym. There are fast parts, and slow parts, tense parts and light hearted parts, and they all ebb and flow in a certain way. This is what is referred to as the pacing of the story by many people. Generally, when you have multiple storylines going on within the larger story, you tend to keep the pacing uniform across all of the storylines. Action scenes will happen in generally the same part of the story. Quiet moments of reflection will generally happen in the same part of the story. Scenes with the same tempo are generally grouped together to keep the flow of the pacing consistent across all storylines in the larger story. This is because when you cut from the middle of a tense action scene straight into a scene with two women talking about books, it kind of comes out of nowhere, and it makes your brain stumble a bit. You may not consciously notice the complete reversal in the pacing, but your brain did, and it starts to wonder why we were all excited and now we're bored, and why that change happened so abruptly. Yes, this exact scene transition happens in this book.
You want to know why you didn't like the Canto Bight scenes in Star Wars: The Last Jedi? PACING!!! That's probably the biggest reason why those scenes fail to engage, because they're very poorly paced, and very poorly interwoven with the rest of the story.
Look, messing with pacing and the reader's expectations makes for some very good and unpredictable plot developments. But when it's not done right, it really, really hurts the stroy. An author will usually use abrupt pacing changes to either draw your attention to something, making it stand out, or to give you a sense of discord, which is often used in horror stories to make you feel uncomfortable, but you don't really know why. A really good example of messing with pacing to enhance a plot twist would be in The Black Prism by Brent Weeks. There is a part near the end of the book, right before the climax where Weeks weaves two scenes with very contrasting tones and tempos together. On one side you have a fanatic ranting to his armies about the evils of the system, and it's cut in with a solemn religious ceremony. But at the same time, these two different scenes are also about the same thing. The pacing of these two events is completely opposite. It leaves you a little off balance, so that when the plot twist hits, it hits extremely hard. Yeah, Goodkind isn't doing anything fancy like that. He just doesn't seem to understand the entire concept of pacing, and so the pacing in this book is just attrocious.
And, so, the Blood Beast. Okay, so the whole randomness to its attacks really feels kind of like Goodkind is ripping off ideas from better writers here. Yes, two authors can independently come up with similar ideas, but this really feels too derivitive of other works in Fantasy and Sci-fi to be anything other than Goodkind blatantly borrowing ideas from other sources. Most notably I'd bring up the bubbles of evil from Wheel of Time. And we're back to the similarities between the two series argument again, and well, meh. Another thing that I don't like about the Blood Beast is that it never really does anything that's really all that threatening. Richard very easily deals with its attacks in this book. And there really are no lasting consequences to them. Sure a bunch of his men were torn up by it, but we never met these people, so their loss doesn't really impact us. Cara survives none the worse for wear. Richard takes dozens of wounds when it attacks with acidic spiderwebs. Goodkind describes the searing pain, and says that Richard has blood pouring down his arms and legs from the wounds that the web leaves. But the second he's free, Goodkind forgets all about the wounds. They're never mentioned again. Richard goes on like he was never hurt to begin with. When you have your character get hurt, there have to be consequences. There has to be something at stake. If he is hurt, he has to continue dealing with the wounds. They don't get to magically disappear as soon as the tension is resolved. Especially when you have very firmly established that Richard can't generally use his magic to heal himself.
So, there's a scene in this book where a spy grabs a little girl and holds a knife to her throat. Richard puts his hand on his sword, and then Goodkind goes into this... I don't even know what to call it, where he just describes what Richard plans to do and why for about 9 pages. He overdescribes Richard's intent to the point that instead of building the tension up behind the moment that he actually strikes, that it, again, becomes something of a parody of itself. It goes far beyond tense into boring, and then far beyond boring to the point that it's actually funny how long Goodkind draws it out. And so a scene that's meant to be an explosive moment of action from our hero is an over-analyzed, excruciatingly over-described mockery of what it was supposed to be. I mean, was there even an editor working on this book? Was he too afraid of Goodkind to speak up and do his damn job? Did none of his superiors look over his shoulder and say, wait, what the fuck man, what are you even doing? Why aren't you marking the shit out of this and sending it back to be fixed?
And speaking of editors. Take the 40 page long conversation between Richard and Shota. Please. Take that entire conversation away from me. Seriously. Look, I know I keep harping on the repetition in these books. And in a way, I'm doing the same thing Goodkind does by repeating it so much, but it really has to be said, yet again here. This conversation is 40 pages long, I counted them. There is about 1 page worth of relevant conversation in it. One. Page. I don't know why the Chainfire Trilogy, is even a trilogy. If you cut out all of the repetative dialog, all of the explanations of things that are given multiple times, and all of the recaps of previous books, the story of these three books, would probably have fit into a single volume quite easily, and with room to spare. just sayin'. That is how much this book repeats itself. Those are the ridiculous lengths to which the author goes to pad this thing with unnecessary dialog.
And speaking of dialog. This is not how people talk to each other. This is not how people act, or react, or think. These are not people. These are not characters. These are not conversations, or character interactions. I don't know what they are, but the fact that Goodkind seems to believe that this is how people act and speak only solidifies my suspicion that he is from a planet other than Earth, and has never actually met a real human being before.
Nicci is still as badass as ever, though. I actually liked her battle scene, though the fact that it cuts away right in the middle of it to Verna and a Mord Sith talking about books of prophecy does kind of kill the mood. And just the way that it's written is so amatuerish and, frankly, incompetent that I wonder why I ever thought Goodkind was a decent author to begin with. Although, even though I love Nicci, and she is, by far, my favorite character of this series... The Bechdel Test took one look at this book and quietly leapt to its death off an overpass.
100% done.
Okay, so, Nicci, last time we saw her, she was in the middle of a desperate battle, fighting off multiple wizards, while the people of Altur Rang deal with the Imperial Order army sent to sack their city. Yeah, we don't go back for the rest of that battle. Instead, Nicci sits around the Wizard's Keep waiting for Richard to arrive there and briefly thinks about what happened through the rest of the battle. Okay, so, again, this is ALL telling and NO showing. We are TOLD that these events happened by the character. We are not SHOWN these events as they happen. Which would you rather read? I, for one, would rather have had the battle scene, than a brief and inadequate second hand account of it. Why even bother including a battle at all if all you are going to do is show us the first little bit of it, and then tell us about the rest in a way that really doesn't do the events any justice at all? I mean, Nicci freaking ripped a wizard's still beating heart out of his chest with her bare hands! How awesome would that have been to experience as an action scene in the book, rather than a lazy, oh yeah, and this happened while we were focusing on other characters? This is the author flat out, and blatantly telling us that he was too lazy to write out the rest of the battle, but it would have been really awesome if he had.
Now, I'm going to say something rather unexpected. The end of this book is actually quite good. The last 100 pages are so, are pretty excellent. The climax is good, the events leading up to it are good. It's not a big actiony scene, but a handful of scenes vindicating Richard in his belief that Kahlan exists, and solving the mystery of what happened to her. There's not much in the way of repetition here, and no recapping, and Goodkind just lets the scenes play out. When he actually does that, he's actually a pretty decent writer. The problem is that he rarely does that. And no matter how good the last 100 pages were, the 650 before them were mind-numbing and infuriating. The climax does not redeem the rest of the book. You could literally cut out around 70% of this entire book, and you would still have all of the relevant scenes to the plot in there. A good 70% of this book is mindless repetition, and Goodkind repeatedly telling us things that we already know.