The Nadars have had a turbulent and colourful history. Their efforts to rise above their depressed condition assumed dramatic form in the series of escalating confrontations between the caste and its antagonists. From the breast-cloth controversy the sack of Sivakasi to the Nadar Mahajana Sangam, the Nadars rise, encapsulating the processes of social mobility in Indian sopciety, has given rich texture to the analysis of a community in change.
A comprehensive history of one community over 200 years. As a community, Nadars grew from a discriminated lower class to one of the prominent business communities of TamilNad. Through their story of rise, Hardgrave captures the flux in caste through the colonial era and independent India (through 60s). Recommended!
I have been wanting to read this book ever since it was recommended to me by Rick Sam. The book has been of personal and historical/ sociological interest to me since I was born into this caste (for better or worse) and I think of this as the first step in learning about the history of India. As with many things, I would like to start with learning about what's closest to me and then make my way to what's furthest to me. After all, what do I have in common with someone from Rajasthan or Assam? When I say personal interest, I don't mean that I have a personal attachment to the caste of Nadar. Despite being raised in a family where everyone identifies with caste.
Growing up, I noticed a tremendous amount of caste solidarity among family member to the point of absurdity. I have a long wondered where this come from? Why avoid associating with people of other castes? why maintain endogamy? where does the caste pride come from? None of this has made sense to me ever since I was a kid. I started to question these things when I was a teenager. Many people tell me that someone must have "brainwashed" me through politics or through "Christian ministry". The truth is that no one "brainwashed" me into rejecting caste identity. The answer is simple. I wondered would I be fine with someone else discriminating me because I was from a certain caste? Shouldn't I treat others like I would want to be treated? Isn't that the foundational dictum of Christian ethics? Isn't caste ideology a denial of the human dignity that God has given everyone? How can I reject to see the image of God in all of God's creation? All of this was perfectly obvious to me even before I turned 13. How can something so obvious to a 13-year-old prove to be an enigma to the so-called adults is absolutely beyond me. My contempt for the system made me want to dig into the history of Nadars and this book didn't disappoint.
I have come to completely reject the idea of caste as it explicitly draws from Hindu theology and politics. Hence, despite rejecting caste, I take caste to be fundamental in the way Indian culture and society operate. Therefore, to understand India, one must study the underlying Hindu hierarchy of caste which is taken for granted when we see how India has operated and continues to operate today. Here's my start!
Robert Hardgrave wrote most of this as a part of his dissertation. He wanted to understand the history of Nadars and how they worked hard to, essentially, lift them up by their bootstraps. The story begins with Robert Cardwell who first encountered this group of people who were palyma tree climbers in today's Tirunelveli district. Cardwell began to work with this group and studied their history from the primary sources that were available to him at that time.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.