20/20 — 2023. the 20th book of 2023’s reading challenge.
it is june 23, a month away from my birthday, and i continue reading osamu dazai’s “december 8th.”
it is not a fictional story. it is a diary.
the book starts with the nameless housewife confessing as she writes her diary. it is december 8th, 1941—the 2,600th anniversary of the founding day. jane doe decided to write a diary for the 2,700th anniversary of founding day, hoping her book would be somewhere in the corner of a storehouse somewhere or hopefully cherished by many as a historical reference. then, jane specifies that her husband, unnamed as well, is very critical of her writing, the sentences are not at all beautiful, he says.
she then begins to ramble about what happened between john doe (fyi, john doe and jane doe aren't their names. they are simply a replacement as it would be very hideous to write “the wife, the wife, the wife” every time i want to mention something) and mr. iba, a friend of john doe. the conversation goes as follows:
“you know, i really have been worrying recently—when the 2,700th founding anniversary comes, do you think we should we refer to it as ‘twenty-seven hundredth’ or ‘two thousand, seven hundredth’? it’s definitely been bothering me. i’m really suffering over it. what about you—doesn’t it bother you?” mr. iba said. “hmmm,” mr. doe said, thinking seriously. “now that you mention it, it does bother me a lot.” “see what i mean?” said mr. iba, also sounding quite serious. “they all seem to be making it ‘twenty-seven hundred.’ that’s what they seem to be doing. but i’d rather see them do it ‘two thousand, seven hundred.’ somehow, ‘twenty-seven hundred’ just doesn’t seem right. it’s kind of nasty, don’t you think? i mean, it’s not a telephone number, and i’d just like to see them do it right. somehow or other, i’d like to hear it done as ‘two thousand seven hundred,’ don’t you think?” asked mr. iba in a truly worried tone of voice. “but then,” john proposed in a horribly self-important tone, “in a hundred years from now, it may not be either of those ‘seven hundreds’—they may have come up with some totally different pronunciation. say, ‘sivinty,’ or something like that. . . .”
that is when jane bursts out laughing. and how truly absurd it is to converse about such things with guests.
then, jane specifies how her husband makes a living from writing novels. jane specifies her inability to read her husband's stories because he is apparently not good.
i will leave the rest for you to read. this story is extraordinarily fascinating, and i do not want anyone to miss out on how remarkable it is.