My mom recently read 15 books, and recommended this one to me as the best of the bunch, and so I read it after her.
I liked that Annie, the main character, is a librarian, and that her book knowledge translated well to survival knowledge.
I also enjoyed the descriptions of Declan's love of flying.
Plus, the survival story itself, after the plane crash, drew me in, and I am giving this book 4 stars. It was a fun read.
At one point in the book, Annie felt that Declan understood her unspoken thoughts perfectly, not just in that moment, but as a general statement. After only a couple of weeks (2 or 3 maybe?), I find that highly unlikely.
Also, it felt like bad advice, to me, that Declan urged Annie to proclaim her search for her unknown grandfather (who hadn't married her grandmother) publicly on stage, and accuse someone, who may or may not have wanted this to be public knowledge in front of the whole town. That mingled the search for truth with other social motives for him - embarrassment, possible relationship fall-out, etc - that might make it less likely for him to answer honestly. It also cast unnecessary shadow on his integrity in his current relationship with his wife. She, however, seemed to implicitly trust him.
I wouldn't have minded if Annie had been more open about her relationship to her grandma, and perhaps even her search for her grandpa, if it hadn't been done on a stage.
Besides which, as an introvert, I found the public stage for her search unnerving, even if I wouldn't have minded everyone knowing about the ancient-history relationship.
The author and characters kept referring to various characters as "eye candy," which, to me, felt demeaning, almost derogatory. The author did point out other positive character traits, so I don't think she wanted to minimize other aspects, but it seemed to me that the repetition of the "eye candy" theme made it a central focus, rather than deeper, soul-level character. That felt shallow to me.
I have friend who consistently points out in her reviews when a romance moves too quickly to marriage, when the characters don't really know each other yet. That would be a concern in this story, too. We know that the characters survived a crisis together, but we don't know if they have common interests or how well they relate in the more mundane, day-to-day aspects of life.
And finally, although this is Christian romance, we have no idea what the characters actually believe. There is no mention of Jesus, only of God. So they might be Deists, as opposed to Christians. We don't know. It might be more accurate to describe this as "wholesome romance" on the level of Hallmark movies rather than "Christian romance." Deists believe in God, but don't believe Jesus is divine, or that He died to save us from sins.
In fact, the characters do mention a missing hole in their hearts, but instead of filling it with God, they try to fill it with each other. It reminded me of the famous Blaise Pascal quote, “There is a God-shaped vacuum in the heart of each man which cannot be satisfied by any created thing but only by God the Creator, made known through Jesus Christ.” So, the characters mentioning the hole was a perfect set up for that discussion, but they never "went there."