I'm for the main an eclectic reader but biographies and sci-fi of the space variety are the big omissions in my book collection. This is only the second one I have read (the first being that of Peter Mandelson, no comments please) and to my surprise I loved it. Rather than the dry life and times of the subject, this was wittily written, light and by the end had me a little in love with Edward Marshall Hall. In fairness Sally Smith did not have the hardest job in creating a readable biography of this barrister's life. Good-looking, sporty, always on the rebellious side, successful, wealthy, charming and involved in some of the most scandalous trials of the late Victorian to Edwardian era he is a gift to anyone recounting his colourful life.
Smith's skill is in not allowing the cases she retells to dominate and so they are recounted through M H's involvement. In many of the cases he provided defence for the death penalty was the sentence for a guilty verdict and although we have often been reminded of the tales of innocent men hanging Smith reminds us that the sentence took a grave toll on the defence team. I had never considered this aspect of why in a civilised society it has no place until Smith sensitively discusses the weight of responsibility, the feelings of helplessness and guilt that you did not manage to save your client from death.
On a lighter note what was enlightening was the sexual antics of the English upper-classes during this period. Clearly you were no-one without a lover and some of the cases make today's public laundering of dirty washing seem anodyne. Virgin births and murderous husband swapping all make an appearance.
While EMH was both feted and discredited for his in court dramatics – high on emotion, low on facts – it was fitting to a time and place where the stakes were significantly higher than today, and for some of the more salacious or celebrity trials probably quite fitting (if you cannot turn a case of libel where the slight was merely suggesting an actress to be older than her true years into a reflection of the ridiculous nature of this being given time in court, then when can you?). His style of defence has moved on – no longer needed as the job of forensic science has meant that you need less reliance on playing to the emotions of the jury, however one can surely still see his legacy in the impassioned, arguably overwrought addresses to the jury in many US courts.
A worthwhile read for everyone interested in trials, the court system or notable crimes of that era.