This is a difficult review.
Having some practice with group relaxation techniques used in team building and just before exercise or group therapy sessions (from my Psych. rotation years)- I thought I would get more out of this book.
As opposed to it being a step toward relaxation and awareness, it became about 1/2 way through the book, almost the opposite. Perhaps I know too much about reactive relaxation through other methods (like muscle tightening and/or breathing techniques etc.)? They work better.
Regardless, this book was not for me. Repetitions and mantra of one word, and all kinds of other practices seem to work in group or by observation, but IMHO, not well in print. Some of these pages sounded so silly they made me laugh, made me tense, did not calm or flow to a one thought peace (a non-think).
The intros of those Saints lives! That was the 2 star part, instead of a one. And yet, even there, my definition of saint and hers are not on the same steps of values to our context meanings. They just don't seem to be similar. Her saints accept all as it is in their own introverted reality. My saints are role models toward active extroversion. They are born to act, not just be.
My saints hold moral "open eyes" but their trust does not extend to this world's reality as these people she has picked. Other than Hildegard- who was a woman for all ages and although walled up in childhood (literally entombed alone in a walled hut as the "prayer" source for her village)- did end up becoming dominate and entwined in her own real time and events toward everyone's well being and earthly health. NOT just the spiritual.
Gina's saints are people with all trust and expectation of goodness peaceful and nearly non-reactive under all earthy circumstances. My saints are far more realist to human nature and to simplicity while making visibility and progress in the world. They don't preach, they act well with role modeling for the "teaching" portions of their lives. Like Theresa of the Child Jesus (Lisieux). It's a different "simple" way.
Some of her models of/for thought are more poetry than they are meditation. The feather one worked. But being aware and walking to just observe and nothing else, is not wordy and literal for most people, IMHO. And this makes it MORE so.
These methods could be taught, but don't work for me in print direction at all. They only annoyed; brought strange giggles and distractions. I do not meditate on such emotive overload concepts and flowery hyperbole, in the first place. Simple, simple, simple is the way to go for me. Following a wave on a lake, seeing the colors in the swirl by the tree root etc. Not long passages of lyrical concept.
Me thinks Gina Marie is a vast overthinker.