Actual review: 1.5 stars
I honestly don't know whether to give this book 1 or 2 stars for this Goodreads rating system, but I'm feeling a little generous, so I'll round up to 2 stars for now. Might change later though. We'll see.
But oh man, this book frustrated me. I wasn't expecting to love it anyway, since I enjoyed but had a few problems with the first book and thought the second one was mostly okay. But I was surprised by just how much I disliked this book.
1. Starting off with a relatively minor complaint: the writing. The writing style isn't terrible or anything; I generally understood what was going on. But it was so repetitive at times. The constant repeating of "Remember who you are", "Remember who I call you", "Surrender to the light", etc., was just annoying when it happens every single chapter.
And the dialogue too was a little cringey at times, because everyone was constantly trying to sound so profound and deep and spiritual, and no one ever just talked like a normal person. It's all platitudes and feel-good phrases. There's no subtlety in anything here.
And speaking of no subtlety...
2. The theology in this book is so...bad. I'm not even talking about the message or theme. The message is okay-ish, but the theology - this "I'm not calling it Christianity because there's no Christ-figure ever mentioned or represented, but it's totally pounded into your head that it's meant to be Christianity" theology - is absolutely terribly and annoyingly written.
Look, I don't expect every book, especially fiction books, to constantly line up with every single thing I believe. And I also don't mind religion being in books (depending on how well its done). But if you're going to write Christianity-without-calling-it-Christianity into your book, along with constantly using a bunch of phrases from actual verses in the actual Bible, then you need to make sure you're doing it right because otherwise those are dangerous waters to be treading in.
Some of my problems with this theology intending to be Christianity are as follows: The belief-system in this book is very "me-centered". The characters are constantly told that they are the "light of the world," that they are "blameless" and good, that they can save the city with the light. The reason these things don't sit well with me in this specific book is because, in Christian theology, humans are not good or blameless apart from Christ. So this "Father" figure, who is clearly meant to represent God, is constantly telling them that they're already blameless and perfect and his children on their own...that's just not okay if you're intending to write a "Christian" book.
And I feel like another reason why this annoys me so much is because this book is so preachy about it all. There are ways to incorporate religion (whether a real religion that exists in the real world or a made-up one) in a book without shoving those beliefs down the reader's throat, but this book doesn't blend its belief system into the world at all. The beliefs take center stage over everything else.
It's weird because I don't remember this being a problem in the first two books. The belief system was still there, of course, but I don't remember it overtaking the the plot or the characters as much as in this book.
Which brings me to my final problem.
3. The characters are so flat in this book. Seriously, I don't know how it happened, but I just cared nothing for any of them. I liked Carrington and Remko as individual characters in the previous two books, but they're barely in this one, and when they are they do...basically nothing. Considering this book was supposed to be about them getting their daughter back, it's sad to me that their reunion at the end didn't make me feel anything. Not that there was much of a reunion scene, but still.
Their daughter Elise was such a boring character anyway. She had potential in the beginning, of course. She struggles a little, but once she "surrenders" to the light, that's basically the end of any character development, and she always does the right thing for the rest of the book. And considering that she surrenders about 1/3 of the way through, that means she was pretty flat for 2/3 of the book, all the way to the end.
And - once again reiterating that this book, seemingly, was supposed to be about how Elise's family get her back - I just have to ask: WHY. WASN'T. KENNEDY. A. POV. CHARACTER????
Seriously, what was the point of writing in a little sister for Elise, who gets chosen to be on the team to find Elise, if she does absolutely nothing and they have barely any scenes together? We never get to see how Kennedy feels about any of this. How does she feel about her life in Trylin? What did she think about her parents, who for the past 20 years have been understandably grieving over their first child who was kidnapped? How does she feel knowing that she has an older sister she hasn't met? Was she ever resentful? Overshadowed? Did she feel like she had to "prove" herself? There's so much potential for this character, but nothing is ever explored.
And then there's Willis. Oh Willis. The moment he was magically able to find Elise without any help from the others, who were supposedly chosen to help rescue Elise, and it was said that they had an "instant connection" (paraphrasing), I desperately hoped it wouldn't turn into an insta-love situation. But of course my hopes were quickly dashed because it did. I'm not that surprised, since this series started with an insta-love-y romance between Carrington and Remko, but I'm still disappointed.
And speaking of romantic love, I wasn't a fan of Jesse being "in love" with Elise. Considering that it seemed like he was one of the ones who helped care for her as she grew up (at least that's what it seemed like to me, but I'm not sure the writing was very clear in this regard)...I feel like it would have been better if he had had more of a fatherly/parental sort of love for her. It would've tied in better with a family theme and made it a little stronger, since the family stuff unfortunately took a backseat to everything else. I think it would've made their confrontation at the end a little more impactful too.
Still don't care about The Scientist as a villain, and Nicolas was really uninteresting too. Not that any of them were given the chance to be interesting, competent villains, since it was drilled into our heads that "the light is stronger", so there was no real conflict anyway.
And we still never really got any explanations about Aaron. Who or what is he supposed to be? No idea. He just appears, tries to sound profound, and then disappears.
And...I think that's about it. I am genuinely a little sad that this last book disappointed me so much. This series had a lot of potential, especially from the first book, but it unfortunately went downhill super fast for me.