I like Edgar Allan Poe's short fiction, and I have enjoyed various comics and film adaptations of his works, but this volume leaves a bit cold. It is not that these adaptations (whether viewed strictly as adapted material or merely as stories in their own right) are all bad, but there are far too many instances of mediocrity and fumbling for my liking. For instance, while working my way through the volume, I remarked on at least two occasions that a piece managed to bungle the ending, which is really one of the core elements of most Poe stories (and definitely in the pieces in question). Perhaps I ought to have been prepared; even the subtitle of the volume makes wince a little: "A Graphic Adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe's Stories. This subtitle implies a singular adaptation, when we are in fact given nine very different (in both quality and visual style) adaptations, and also that it is all of Poe's stories, which is certainly not the case.
Looking at the individual pieces quickly, grouped together by my evaluation of them and starting at the bottom of the barrel, the volume opens weakly, first with an introduction by director Roger Corman, which I did not care for at all, and followed by Dan Whitehead and Stuart Tipples' adaptation of "The Raven", which for me is the absolute low mark of the volume. While preserving Poe's text (there may have been something edited out; while I have not double-checked it, the metre occasionally seemed off, which is certainly not the case with the poem, but it may be a layout issue), the visuals really do not add anything of value for me. Also, the volume mission statement of updating the adaptation to the present day (or in some cases the future) does not work for here. If anything it takes something away from Poe's poem; and it really should not have to. Rated on its own, these two elements would get single stars.
"The Tell-Tale Heart" by writer Jeremy Slater and artist Alice Duke, and the dystopian take on "The Masque of the Red Death" by writer Adam Prosser and artist Erik Rangel both bungle their endings, and have various issues (the former does not quite work for me in its updated setting, and the latter seems far too self-indulgent and takes me out of the fiction to the point where I do not really care about the plot or the characters). I would rate these two stories with two stars: weak okays, but nothing I would return for.
"The Facts in the Case of Mr Valdemar" by writer Jeremy Slater (his first entry of two in the volume) and artist John McCrea, and "The Fall of the House of Usher" by volume editor Dan Whitehead (his second writing credit in the volume) and artist Shane Ivan Oakley both are pretty clear two and half stars - they clearly work better than the two previous stories on many levels (e.g. the temporal update and the art), but they also fail in delivering the scare that ought be there. It just never really materialises, because of issues with the pacing and delivery. Perhaps it is a bit symptomatic that the writers here are the same as in the previous category; and is it not a shame that these two writers then are the ones to get two stories each of the nine in the volume?
While technically not a short story adaptation, Laura Howell's charming and somewhat fantastic-leaning two-page biography of Poe entitled "Facts in the Case of Edgar Allan Poe: January 19th 1809 - October 7th 1849" clocks in on three very solid stars for me. I like it. It is competent and entertaining.
"The Pit and the Pendulum" by writer Jamie Delano and artist Steve Pugh, and "The Black Cat" by writers Leah Moore (daughter of Alan Moore) and John Reppion and artist James Fletcher both deliver something that appeals to me more. Both adaptations successfully transfers Poe's fiction into a present day setting (or in the case of "The Black Cat", at least a setting between the original's era and ours). The latter takes quite a bit of creative freedom with the story (and as such is not my favourite comics adaptation of the story), but the result is nevertheless good, and both stories rate as three and a half stars for me.
Finally, at the top of the list, we have two stories which really, really work for me, and which have each earned four solid stars: writer Ian Edginton and artist D'Israeli's futuristic "The Murders in the Rue Morgue" and writer David Berner and artist Natalie Sandells"The Oval Portrait". The former offers an added twist and very satisfying (given the new setting) to Poe's story, whereas the latter is probably my favourite in the entire volume. In it, the update to present day, the pacing, and the punch of the ending not the least all deliver in a very satisfactory manner.
So, all was not bad, and I do not regret reading the volume. But after careful consideration, I am not willing to give it more than the two stars with which I have graded it. Well, I would be inclined to add half star for the high points, but the sum total still does not warrant for me to round that off to three stars.
You can definitely spend your time on something better. And if you want Poe adaptations, why not have a look at Bernie Wrightson's or Richard Corben's for instance.