What do you think?
Rate this book
1066 Turned Upside Down
Ever wondered what might have happened if William the Conqueror had been beaten at Hastings? Or if Harald Hardrada had won at Stamford Bridge? Or if Edward the Confessor had died with an heir ready to take his place? Then here is the perfect set of stories for you. ‘1066 Turned Upside Down’ explores a variety of ways in which the momentous year of 1066 could have played out differently.
Written by nine well-known authors to celebrate the 950th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings, the stories will take you on a journey through the wonderful ‘what ifs’ of England’s most famous year in history.
Written by nine well-known authors to celebrate the 950th anniversary of the Battle of Hastings, the stories will take you on a journey through the wonderful ‘what ifs’ of England’s most famous year in history.
197 pages, Kindle Edition
First published August 1, 2016
30 people are currently reading
297 people want to read
About the author
Joanna Courtney
13 books202 followersMy first literary accolade was a creative writing prize at primary school and from that point on I wanted to be a novelist. I was always reading as a child and often made up stories for my brother and sister on long car journeys. I was also a huge Enid Blyton fan and by ten I was writing my own (doubtless terrible) boarding school novels. Perhaps inevitably, I took my degree in English literature and it was at Cambridge, specialising in medieval literature, that I first discovered what has become a true passion for ancient history.
I took a sidestep after university to work in a wonderful textiles factory in Lancashire - a move that led me to my lovely husband, but didn't satisfy my yearning to write. Married and living in Derbyshire, however, I took up my pen again in the sparse hours available between raising my two stepchildren and two more of my own. At that hectic time, I primarily wrote shorter fiction and I've had well over 200 stories and serials published in women's magazines. As my children began to grow up and then leave home, however, I have had more time to write.
My passion is freeing women from either the obscurity or the mistruths of male-dominated history. My first trilogy, The Queens of the conquest, is about the women fighting to be Queen of England in 1066 - Edyth of Mercia, wife of King Harold; Elizaveta of Kiev; wife of Harald Hardrada; and Matilda of Flanders, wife of William the Conqueror.
My second explores the true story of three of Shakespeare's most famous - and most maligned heroines - Lady Macbeth, Ophelia and Cordelia.
I also write WW2 fiction as Anna Stuart.
I took a sidestep after university to work in a wonderful textiles factory in Lancashire - a move that led me to my lovely husband, but didn't satisfy my yearning to write. Married and living in Derbyshire, however, I took up my pen again in the sparse hours available between raising my two stepchildren and two more of my own. At that hectic time, I primarily wrote shorter fiction and I've had well over 200 stories and serials published in women's magazines. As my children began to grow up and then leave home, however, I have had more time to write.
My passion is freeing women from either the obscurity or the mistruths of male-dominated history. My first trilogy, The Queens of the conquest, is about the women fighting to be Queen of England in 1066 - Edyth of Mercia, wife of King Harold; Elizaveta of Kiev; wife of Harald Hardrada; and Matilda of Flanders, wife of William the Conqueror.
My second explores the true story of three of Shakespeare's most famous - and most maligned heroines - Lady Macbeth, Ophelia and Cordelia.
I also write WW2 fiction as Anna Stuart.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 45 reviews
July 20, 2016
What a brilliant book this was. I just love the idea that the authors have taken a period in time and let their creative juices flow. 1066 is a fascinating period to read about and to have these authors explore the “what if” was refreshing
I’m a big fan of collections like this, I find then fun to read. Not only do they flow easily since they are self-contained short stories but you also get introduced to some authors you might not previously have heard of. I’ll admit I’ve only read books be three of these authors.. that will soon change.
The book starts with a forward by C.C Humphreys. I’m the first to admit I’ve never really understood the need for these in a book but this one has changed my mind. This forward was witty and fun and perfectly set up the book for me as a reader
Each author tackles at least one story, they each take an event that happened and twist it.. they explore the possibilities that might have occurred if things went differently.
After reading other books I’ve always wondered about the “what ifs” Such as what would have happened if Harold had waited before going to war on that fateful day.. what would have happened if the rest of Harold’s army had arrived in time to engage in the fight..the outcome could have been so different
One of my favourite stories had to be the tale by Richard Dee, the perfect mix of science fiction and historical fiction, where the butterfly effect is explored and that if you could travel back to the past even the slightest change could mean big changes to the future
It was really good to see Annie Whitehead take part in this book also. If you’ve read my reviews you’ll know I’m a fan of hers and her story was particularly enjoyable to read. Her tale focused on the Battle of Fulford where Morcar and Edwin were defeated by Harald Hardrada.. what if this was the other way around??
Each story was well written and allowed the author to play with the events of history and I enjoyed every one of them. I also really liked at the end of each story the reader is given discussion suggestions which raise some interesting thoughts
This book was a gripping read and it’s opened my eyes to more wonderful authors.. I’ll be sure to add some of their books to my TBR list... some i already have :)
Any fan of the period who likes the idea of exploring the endless possibilities of what could have happen will enjoy this
I’m a big fan of collections like this, I find then fun to read. Not only do they flow easily since they are self-contained short stories but you also get introduced to some authors you might not previously have heard of. I’ll admit I’ve only read books be three of these authors.. that will soon change.
The book starts with a forward by C.C Humphreys. I’m the first to admit I’ve never really understood the need for these in a book but this one has changed my mind. This forward was witty and fun and perfectly set up the book for me as a reader
Each author tackles at least one story, they each take an event that happened and twist it.. they explore the possibilities that might have occurred if things went differently.
After reading other books I’ve always wondered about the “what ifs” Such as what would have happened if Harold had waited before going to war on that fateful day.. what would have happened if the rest of Harold’s army had arrived in time to engage in the fight..the outcome could have been so different
One of my favourite stories had to be the tale by Richard Dee, the perfect mix of science fiction and historical fiction, where the butterfly effect is explored and that if you could travel back to the past even the slightest change could mean big changes to the future
It was really good to see Annie Whitehead take part in this book also. If you’ve read my reviews you’ll know I’m a fan of hers and her story was particularly enjoyable to read. Her tale focused on the Battle of Fulford where Morcar and Edwin were defeated by Harald Hardrada.. what if this was the other way around??
Each story was well written and allowed the author to play with the events of history and I enjoyed every one of them. I also really liked at the end of each story the reader is given discussion suggestions which raise some interesting thoughts
This book was a gripping read and it’s opened my eyes to more wonderful authors.. I’ll be sure to add some of their books to my TBR list... some i already have :)
Any fan of the period who likes the idea of exploring the endless possibilities of what could have happen will enjoy this
September 24, 2016
It appears that another group of authors has attempted to do what the H Team has done in compiling short stories from each author on a major event in history, except this group is doing it with an alternate history twist. These short stories explore how things would have gone down in 1066 England if Edgar was crowned instead of Harold, or if William of Normandy had lost at Hastings, and several other "what if" speculations.
It also differs from the H Team's books because these are truly individual short stories. Each tale has nothing to do with one another (apart from being based on the events of 1066), which in itself is not necessarily a bad thing. There are plenty of unrelated short story compilations out there which people really enjoy. But it's disappointing when you also consider that most of the stories are so short that you really don't get an idea of how history would have been radically different if these "what if" scenarios had happened. I felt like it posed more questions than it answered. I would have liked each story to not only present an alternate event, but also show us how the succeeding events thereafter would have been different as a result. Don't just show us how the Battle of Hastings would have been different if Harold had won, show us what would have happened after that - how would it have changed England? If they had done that, I wouldn't have minded each story having nothing to do with the next, as it allowed more than one alternate history scenario to be explored.
There were author's notes and discussion suggestions that attempted to explore the resulting events a little bit, which were informative and enlightening, but it just wasn't the same, and wasn't what I was expecting. I did enjoy them though, and actually wound up thinking this might have been a better project had they just approached it with academic essays instead of trying to make them into fictional short stories.
Don't get me wrong, the writing quality from all these stories is very good. But to me, the short stories felt like something that was just quickly thrown together to make each author a few extra bucks on the self published ebook sales, and give them some more exposure. I guess I was hoping for something a little more in depth. However, for only $1.99, it's probably worth the read for those really interested in this topic.
Historical Readings & Reviews
It also differs from the H Team's books because these are truly individual short stories. Each tale has nothing to do with one another (apart from being based on the events of 1066), which in itself is not necessarily a bad thing. There are plenty of unrelated short story compilations out there which people really enjoy. But it's disappointing when you also consider that most of the stories are so short that you really don't get an idea of how history would have been radically different if these "what if" scenarios had happened. I felt like it posed more questions than it answered. I would have liked each story to not only present an alternate event, but also show us how the succeeding events thereafter would have been different as a result. Don't just show us how the Battle of Hastings would have been different if Harold had won, show us what would have happened after that - how would it have changed England? If they had done that, I wouldn't have minded each story having nothing to do with the next, as it allowed more than one alternate history scenario to be explored.
There were author's notes and discussion suggestions that attempted to explore the resulting events a little bit, which were informative and enlightening, but it just wasn't the same, and wasn't what I was expecting. I did enjoy them though, and actually wound up thinking this might have been a better project had they just approached it with academic essays instead of trying to make them into fictional short stories.
Don't get me wrong, the writing quality from all these stories is very good. But to me, the short stories felt like something that was just quickly thrown together to make each author a few extra bucks on the self published ebook sales, and give them some more exposure. I guess I was hoping for something a little more in depth. However, for only $1.99, it's probably worth the read for those really interested in this topic.
Historical Readings & Reviews
August 4, 2016
I'm almost sad to be done with this one. 950 years ago, nearly to the month (October), a terrible thing happened to England. Yet here, in these stories and for a time, we can ponder the what-ifs. It's just about the only time in history I care to do so. Would the country I love so dearly look the same. Unequivocally, no. But it is still fun to imagine.
Full review to come.
+++++++++++
http://allthebookblognamesaretaken.bl...
www.facebook.com/AllTheBookBlogNamesA...
www.twitter.com/SarahsBookNook
Rating: 5 Stars
I will be the first to admit that I am incredibly to hard to please when it comes to historical fiction. I love history so much, and consider myself pretty well-read on the subjects I love the most, that historical fiction kind of irritates me because it is authors making up conversations and shoving them in the mouths of people I admire. So, you imagine my trepidation over not just historical fiction, but ALTERNATIVE history. Under normal circumstances I could not imagine anyone messing with my Anglo-Saxons, Plantagenets, or Tudors, but to make their lives something completely different?!
And yet.
I am fascinated by the Anglo-Saxons. From King Alfred, to Aethelstan, to Edward the Confessor, and all those in between. So too, does this fascination extend to the short-lived rule of the last two Anglo-Saxon kings: Harold Godwinson and Edgar (grandson of Edmund Ironside). While kingship was generally heredity, ultimately it was the Witan who chose the next king. What accounts we have indicate the Witan chose Harold, though he was only Earl of Wessex and not of royal blood. Edgar was still a teenager at the time, but the son of Edward the Exile, who was Ironside's younger son. Harold was killed at the Battle of Hastings and from there the Witan elected Edgar as king even though he was considered too young to rule (which is why they'd chosen Harold in the first place).
I have a love-hate relationship with the Normans, because I despise the fact that William the Bastard invaded the island I love so dearly and wrecked havoc on the people, towns, and countryside. On the other hand, without William coronation, would the Plantagenet dynasty ever have come to rule? Would we even know Eleanor of Aquitaine's name? Therein lies the dilemma.
I do not believe Harold a saint. It is entirely possible he had Edgar's father Edward the Exile - not to be confused with Edward the Confessor - murdered shortly after The Exile and his young family arrived in England on a summons from The Confessor. The Exile and his family had been living in Hungary for many years, he having settled there after the also-mysterious death of his father, Edmund Ironside - after which The Exile and his older brother, also named Edmund, were spirited out of the country and Cnut's grasp. But by the meager accounts we do have he was a just king who ruled well in his nine month reign and likely could have been good, maybe great. William, on the other hand, insisted he had claim to the throne and was determined to fight for it, reminding everyone that Harold swore an oath to him a few years earlier to support William's claim to the throne. It is very likely that could have happened, but that it was sworn under duress and Harold did so only to ensure that he and his men would live and make it back home. A promise can hardly be considered valid if the person swearing the oath is threatened with death. Unfortunately, while William was pressing his claim from Normandy, Harold's good-for-nothing (and some say insane) brother Tostig was tagging along with the mighty Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, also making his claim to the throne. Harold and his men claimed a huge victory at Stanford Bridge (along with the lives of Tostig and Harald, the last of the mighty Viking warriors), but after that is where things fall apart. Hearing of William's arrival, Harold marches his men straight for him at Hastings, without waiting for back-up or to give his men some rest before the next bloody engagement.
You might wonder what all this has to do with the book, and I will say, well, everything - because the events as I have described above are how history actually went, as far as we can ever really know. The premise of this wonderful little gem is that a series of authors provide their own takes on the year 1066 and COMPLETELY REWRITE HISTORY, sometimes in the most glorious of ways. Ways that made my heart so happy, that for a moment seemed so real. 1066 is one of the most important events in the history of Europe, if not the world. So may paths might have been altered if any number of events had a different outcome. The possibilities are almost endless and in this book we see several of those play out.
So, if I have thoroughly convinced you of how crazy I am about the Anglo-Saxons, then you can believe that this is a must-read. The book is broken up month by month accounts of how events might have occurred instead in 1066. A couple authors contributed more than once, so it was also interesting to compare one of their versions to another. One of the things I really appreciated was a brief summary of the actual history of that month that occurred before each new story. I feel like this is especially important for those who do not know a lot about 1066, so they are able to differentiate between what really occurred and what is a product of that particular author's imagination. It is also nice for people like me who do have that knowledge base but might need a quick refresher of a specific event. In addition, after each story there are two discussion questions to make you ponder further repercussions of the event you just read about. I feel like this was a nice touch, because as you start thinking about changing one outcome, it makes you realize how many other things afterward might be altered as well.
While the entire collection of stories is strong, there are a few that really stood out to me for various reasons and those are the stories I will highlight.
January 1066 begins with the story 'To Crown a King' by Helen Hollick. I appreciated this one right off the bat because it addressed Edgar directly. So often when I am reading books purporting to be the 'history of England', Ironside's death is glossed over and his sons and grandsons are often not mentioned at all. Ironside had been king of England, co-ruling with Cnut, sort of, when he died suddenly. He also happened to be the older half-brother of Edward the Confessor, the one who could have saved everyone a lot of trouble if he would have managed to have a couple children with his wife (not coincidentally, Harold Godwinson's sister) before he died. So, being that Edgar was Ironside's grandson, he was the true heir. But as I mentioned above in my not-so-brief history lesson, the Witan ultimately chose the king and Harold was their pick. Not so in this story though. Edgar voiced his strong argument and was ultimately chosen as England's next king, bypassing Harold altogether.
Another story of particular interest to me was "Emperor of the North" by Joanna Courtney. because it is an option I had never really considered before. My focus in all of my reading about 1066 had always revolved around Harold defeating William at Hastings. I had never before considered what might happen had Harald defeated Harold at Stanford, weeks BEFORE Hastings. But this is exactly what we see happen in this one. As a result of that victory for Harald (and unfortunately, Tostig), the Norwegians eventually succeed in taking the whole of France by 1070. Harald was no longer King, but Emperor. Still not an outcome I would have wanted, but intriguing nonetheless.
The biggest surprise (in two ways) came for me during the May/June 1066 story by Richard Dee. It is called "If You Changed One Thing" and dealt with time-travel. That was the first surprise. The second surprise was that I enjoyed it. I would have to say this might be my favorite story of the whole collection, which is kind of a big deal because they're all great and all have many strengths. This story is told from the perspective of a teacher talking with his students. They are discussing 1066 and the idea of going back in time to change the outcome, but then how that might impact their lives, if they would exist - basically the Butterfly Effect. A boy in the class says that his father's work involves a time machine and he would be able to go back to that fateful battle. His teacher does not believe him...and I will not spoil the rest. Just know that it has the perfect outcome, which also makes it a most-favorite.
Another unusual story is to be found in July 1066, "A Roman Intervenes" by Alison Morton. This was another completely unexpected idea that I think turned out well for the most part. In this author's re-imagining, there is a small country called Roma Nova, entirely independent - basically, Rome survives in this tiny little country where the people still worship Roman gods and they play secret and not-so-secret roles in keeping the peace so to speak. Again, I do not want to give too much away because it is a really wonderful little story, but the ending is quite pleasing for the pro-Anglo-Saxon sect.
There is so much history here and I really want to touch on every single story because they all paint very realistic portraits of so many outcomes, so many what-ifs, and I want to talk about ALL OF THEM. But this review is rapidly approaching one of my longest yet and I think that anyone who only has a passing interest in 1066 has given up long ago. So, I'll touch discuss one more. If you are really interested in absolutely EVERY thought I had while reading, you can check out the notes I made in my progress updates on Goodreads. There are 45 altogether. Just a warning.
In the chapter dedicated to the actual month, October 1066, "Hold England Firm" by Joanna Courtney, I will just say it was everything my Anglo-Saxon-lovin' heart could have hoped for in the real battle. If only Harold had rested his men. If only they had waited for reinforcements. If only, if only, if only.
Okay I lied. Sorry. One more story because it again highlighted Edgar as king and in all honesty that is how the succession should have gone anyway (forgive me, Harold, but at least you'd have been alive had they chosen him to begin with). Unfortunately in this story, Harold had still been killed at Hastings and Edgar chosen by the Witan. In November 1066, "The Battle of London Bridge" by GK Holloway, we see Edgar now as king and this makes all the earls around him uneasy, because he is young and untested in battle. They've been through Stanford and Hastings. They do not know if he really has what it takes. I touched on Edgar's back story previously, so I won't repeat it here, but I think some of their fears were legit. Yet Edgar and his father deserve to have their place in history acknowledged, and it is sometimes overlooked in the chaos and drama of the year. When I was first reading this, I thought of the other difficulties his rule might have presented. Off the top of my head I could not recall how old Edgar had been when his family were summoned by Edward the Confessor and thought it had been when he was in his teens. Language certainly would have been a huge barrier. But I went back and did a little research (yes, I research while reading. I am THAT big of a nerd) and found that it is generally accepted that Edgar was in England around 10 years or so. Thus, he would have been able to learn the language and the customs in that time. I like the issues that arise in this story, the idea that William defeated Harold and was still denied the crown, so he had to save-face with his men so to speak and continue pursuing it anyway - especially after they were promised plenty of plunder. After Edgar and his men are successful in driving back the Normans and defending London, there is a bit of an open-end to the story. At one point it was mentioned that Harold's widow gave birth to a baby boy, so that is something in the back of Edgar's mind. Here he is crowned, rightfully so, yet the dead king's wife has just given birth to her husband's heir - and her brothers happen to be powerful northern earls. That is how the story ends and you are left to imagine what might happen in the ensuing years. Edgar has fended off the Normans, and he might have to do so to his own subjects in the future.
Okay, so I know I have gushed and gushed about how much I adored this book and I do. It is very worthy of those five stars. It is not, however, without its flaws. There were certain phrases used throughout stories that struck me as out of place. Now, I may very well be wrong and these things are totally accurate - just more for me to research! In one story the phrase 'God save the King' was used and I was not sure that was 'a thing' in 1066? I was trying to find out the earliest known use of the phrase but could not find anything that was conclusive. The same thing occurred with the phrase 'step-mother'. I don't know for sure when this became common use and again found nothing conclusive.
Another issue I had was the spelling of names. It was mentioned in the introduction that each auther used the spellings they preferred - and the intro even includes the example of Edith being spelled in various way (Edith, Edyth, Aldytha, Svana, Richenda; 4%). It is confusing enough for newcomers to the subject to sort out all the people who have the same name, but to then have ONE person referred to in so many different ways? I think that could invite confusion. I do understand and respect why the decision was made. On the other hand, I think each story had its own distinct voice, while still meshing well with the others, that a little uniformity could have been a good thing.
So...I guess there is not much else to say except this is a must-read. This is one of THE defining moment in England's history. These tales are superbly imagined and told. And even if you are pro-Norman, you will still find stories of interest to you. Wonderful read, highly recommended.
Full review to come.
+++++++++++
http://allthebookblognamesaretaken.bl...
www.facebook.com/AllTheBookBlogNamesA...
www.twitter.com/SarahsBookNook
Rating: 5 Stars
I will be the first to admit that I am incredibly to hard to please when it comes to historical fiction. I love history so much, and consider myself pretty well-read on the subjects I love the most, that historical fiction kind of irritates me because it is authors making up conversations and shoving them in the mouths of people I admire. So, you imagine my trepidation over not just historical fiction, but ALTERNATIVE history. Under normal circumstances I could not imagine anyone messing with my Anglo-Saxons, Plantagenets, or Tudors, but to make their lives something completely different?!
And yet.
I am fascinated by the Anglo-Saxons. From King Alfred, to Aethelstan, to Edward the Confessor, and all those in between. So too, does this fascination extend to the short-lived rule of the last two Anglo-Saxon kings: Harold Godwinson and Edgar (grandson of Edmund Ironside). While kingship was generally heredity, ultimately it was the Witan who chose the next king. What accounts we have indicate the Witan chose Harold, though he was only Earl of Wessex and not of royal blood. Edgar was still a teenager at the time, but the son of Edward the Exile, who was Ironside's younger son. Harold was killed at the Battle of Hastings and from there the Witan elected Edgar as king even though he was considered too young to rule (which is why they'd chosen Harold in the first place).
I have a love-hate relationship with the Normans, because I despise the fact that William the Bastard invaded the island I love so dearly and wrecked havoc on the people, towns, and countryside. On the other hand, without William coronation, would the Plantagenet dynasty ever have come to rule? Would we even know Eleanor of Aquitaine's name? Therein lies the dilemma.
I do not believe Harold a saint. It is entirely possible he had Edgar's father Edward the Exile - not to be confused with Edward the Confessor - murdered shortly after The Exile and his young family arrived in England on a summons from The Confessor. The Exile and his family had been living in Hungary for many years, he having settled there after the also-mysterious death of his father, Edmund Ironside - after which The Exile and his older brother, also named Edmund, were spirited out of the country and Cnut's grasp. But by the meager accounts we do have he was a just king who ruled well in his nine month reign and likely could have been good, maybe great. William, on the other hand, insisted he had claim to the throne and was determined to fight for it, reminding everyone that Harold swore an oath to him a few years earlier to support William's claim to the throne. It is very likely that could have happened, but that it was sworn under duress and Harold did so only to ensure that he and his men would live and make it back home. A promise can hardly be considered valid if the person swearing the oath is threatened with death. Unfortunately, while William was pressing his claim from Normandy, Harold's good-for-nothing (and some say insane) brother Tostig was tagging along with the mighty Harald Hardrada, King of Norway, also making his claim to the throne. Harold and his men claimed a huge victory at Stanford Bridge (along with the lives of Tostig and Harald, the last of the mighty Viking warriors), but after that is where things fall apart. Hearing of William's arrival, Harold marches his men straight for him at Hastings, without waiting for back-up or to give his men some rest before the next bloody engagement.
You might wonder what all this has to do with the book, and I will say, well, everything - because the events as I have described above are how history actually went, as far as we can ever really know. The premise of this wonderful little gem is that a series of authors provide their own takes on the year 1066 and COMPLETELY REWRITE HISTORY, sometimes in the most glorious of ways. Ways that made my heart so happy, that for a moment seemed so real. 1066 is one of the most important events in the history of Europe, if not the world. So may paths might have been altered if any number of events had a different outcome. The possibilities are almost endless and in this book we see several of those play out.
So, if I have thoroughly convinced you of how crazy I am about the Anglo-Saxons, then you can believe that this is a must-read. The book is broken up month by month accounts of how events might have occurred instead in 1066. A couple authors contributed more than once, so it was also interesting to compare one of their versions to another. One of the things I really appreciated was a brief summary of the actual history of that month that occurred before each new story. I feel like this is especially important for those who do not know a lot about 1066, so they are able to differentiate between what really occurred and what is a product of that particular author's imagination. It is also nice for people like me who do have that knowledge base but might need a quick refresher of a specific event. In addition, after each story there are two discussion questions to make you ponder further repercussions of the event you just read about. I feel like this was a nice touch, because as you start thinking about changing one outcome, it makes you realize how many other things afterward might be altered as well.
While the entire collection of stories is strong, there are a few that really stood out to me for various reasons and those are the stories I will highlight.
January 1066 begins with the story 'To Crown a King' by Helen Hollick. I appreciated this one right off the bat because it addressed Edgar directly. So often when I am reading books purporting to be the 'history of England', Ironside's death is glossed over and his sons and grandsons are often not mentioned at all. Ironside had been king of England, co-ruling with Cnut, sort of, when he died suddenly. He also happened to be the older half-brother of Edward the Confessor, the one who could have saved everyone a lot of trouble if he would have managed to have a couple children with his wife (not coincidentally, Harold Godwinson's sister) before he died. So, being that Edgar was Ironside's grandson, he was the true heir. But as I mentioned above in my not-so-brief history lesson, the Witan ultimately chose the king and Harold was their pick. Not so in this story though. Edgar voiced his strong argument and was ultimately chosen as England's next king, bypassing Harold altogether.
Another story of particular interest to me was "Emperor of the North" by Joanna Courtney. because it is an option I had never really considered before. My focus in all of my reading about 1066 had always revolved around Harold defeating William at Hastings. I had never before considered what might happen had Harald defeated Harold at Stanford, weeks BEFORE Hastings. But this is exactly what we see happen in this one. As a result of that victory for Harald (and unfortunately, Tostig), the Norwegians eventually succeed in taking the whole of France by 1070. Harald was no longer King, but Emperor. Still not an outcome I would have wanted, but intriguing nonetheless.
The biggest surprise (in two ways) came for me during the May/June 1066 story by Richard Dee. It is called "If You Changed One Thing" and dealt with time-travel. That was the first surprise. The second surprise was that I enjoyed it. I would have to say this might be my favorite story of the whole collection, which is kind of a big deal because they're all great and all have many strengths. This story is told from the perspective of a teacher talking with his students. They are discussing 1066 and the idea of going back in time to change the outcome, but then how that might impact their lives, if they would exist - basically the Butterfly Effect. A boy in the class says that his father's work involves a time machine and he would be able to go back to that fateful battle. His teacher does not believe him...and I will not spoil the rest. Just know that it has the perfect outcome, which also makes it a most-favorite.
Another unusual story is to be found in July 1066, "A Roman Intervenes" by Alison Morton. This was another completely unexpected idea that I think turned out well for the most part. In this author's re-imagining, there is a small country called Roma Nova, entirely independent - basically, Rome survives in this tiny little country where the people still worship Roman gods and they play secret and not-so-secret roles in keeping the peace so to speak. Again, I do not want to give too much away because it is a really wonderful little story, but the ending is quite pleasing for the pro-Anglo-Saxon sect.
There is so much history here and I really want to touch on every single story because they all paint very realistic portraits of so many outcomes, so many what-ifs, and I want to talk about ALL OF THEM. But this review is rapidly approaching one of my longest yet and I think that anyone who only has a passing interest in 1066 has given up long ago. So, I'll touch discuss one more. If you are really interested in absolutely EVERY thought I had while reading, you can check out the notes I made in my progress updates on Goodreads. There are 45 altogether. Just a warning.
In the chapter dedicated to the actual month, October 1066, "Hold England Firm" by Joanna Courtney, I will just say it was everything my Anglo-Saxon-lovin' heart could have hoped for in the real battle. If only Harold had rested his men. If only they had waited for reinforcements. If only, if only, if only.
Okay I lied. Sorry. One more story because it again highlighted Edgar as king and in all honesty that is how the succession should have gone anyway (forgive me, Harold, but at least you'd have been alive had they chosen him to begin with). Unfortunately in this story, Harold had still been killed at Hastings and Edgar chosen by the Witan. In November 1066, "The Battle of London Bridge" by GK Holloway, we see Edgar now as king and this makes all the earls around him uneasy, because he is young and untested in battle. They've been through Stanford and Hastings. They do not know if he really has what it takes. I touched on Edgar's back story previously, so I won't repeat it here, but I think some of their fears were legit. Yet Edgar and his father deserve to have their place in history acknowledged, and it is sometimes overlooked in the chaos and drama of the year. When I was first reading this, I thought of the other difficulties his rule might have presented. Off the top of my head I could not recall how old Edgar had been when his family were summoned by Edward the Confessor and thought it had been when he was in his teens. Language certainly would have been a huge barrier. But I went back and did a little research (yes, I research while reading. I am THAT big of a nerd) and found that it is generally accepted that Edgar was in England around 10 years or so. Thus, he would have been able to learn the language and the customs in that time. I like the issues that arise in this story, the idea that William defeated Harold and was still denied the crown, so he had to save-face with his men so to speak and continue pursuing it anyway - especially after they were promised plenty of plunder. After Edgar and his men are successful in driving back the Normans and defending London, there is a bit of an open-end to the story. At one point it was mentioned that Harold's widow gave birth to a baby boy, so that is something in the back of Edgar's mind. Here he is crowned, rightfully so, yet the dead king's wife has just given birth to her husband's heir - and her brothers happen to be powerful northern earls. That is how the story ends and you are left to imagine what might happen in the ensuing years. Edgar has fended off the Normans, and he might have to do so to his own subjects in the future.
Okay, so I know I have gushed and gushed about how much I adored this book and I do. It is very worthy of those five stars. It is not, however, without its flaws. There were certain phrases used throughout stories that struck me as out of place. Now, I may very well be wrong and these things are totally accurate - just more for me to research! In one story the phrase 'God save the King' was used and I was not sure that was 'a thing' in 1066? I was trying to find out the earliest known use of the phrase but could not find anything that was conclusive. The same thing occurred with the phrase 'step-mother'. I don't know for sure when this became common use and again found nothing conclusive.
Another issue I had was the spelling of names. It was mentioned in the introduction that each auther used the spellings they preferred - and the intro even includes the example of Edith being spelled in various way (Edith, Edyth, Aldytha, Svana, Richenda; 4%). It is confusing enough for newcomers to the subject to sort out all the people who have the same name, but to then have ONE person referred to in so many different ways? I think that could invite confusion. I do understand and respect why the decision was made. On the other hand, I think each story had its own distinct voice, while still meshing well with the others, that a little uniformity could have been a good thing.
So...I guess there is not much else to say except this is a must-read. This is one of THE defining moment in England's history. These tales are superbly imagined and told. And even if you are pro-Norman, you will still find stories of interest to you. Wonderful read, highly recommended.
August 11, 2020
Extraordinary!
1066 was a pivotal year for England: it brought the death of two kings and end of Anglo-Saxon rule, the Battle of Hastings, and the Norman Conquest.
‘1066 Turned Upside Down’ is an excellent collection of speculative historical fiction, presenting some very enjoyable reading and some really thought-provoking alternative histories.
As a collection, the quality of the writing is exceptional and the variety of possible outcomes presented is truly fascinating. My personal favourites are the contributions by Annie Whitehead and Joanna Courtney, but I also really enjoyed Richard Dee’s story that highlights the power of teachers to inspire and mentor their students.
It is not necessary to know the history of 1066 before reading: these stories will satisfy both curious minds and history buffs alike. The true historical context of each story serves as an introduction for the fictional account that follows.
The stories are all quite believable, each one challenging the reader to question: what might have been if things had gone even just slightly differently?
1066 was a pivotal year for England: it brought the death of two kings and end of Anglo-Saxon rule, the Battle of Hastings, and the Norman Conquest.
‘1066 Turned Upside Down’ is an excellent collection of speculative historical fiction, presenting some very enjoyable reading and some really thought-provoking alternative histories.
As a collection, the quality of the writing is exceptional and the variety of possible outcomes presented is truly fascinating. My personal favourites are the contributions by Annie Whitehead and Joanna Courtney, but I also really enjoyed Richard Dee’s story that highlights the power of teachers to inspire and mentor their students.
It is not necessary to know the history of 1066 before reading: these stories will satisfy both curious minds and history buffs alike. The true historical context of each story serves as an introduction for the fictional account that follows.
The stories are all quite believable, each one challenging the reader to question: what might have been if things had gone even just slightly differently?
May 2, 2023
Re-read 2023 and my review hasn't changed. An enjoyable collection of alternative histories with some "stronger" than others. This time I particularly enjoyed the story if Harold had waited one day, and the Battle was on 15th October with reinforcements from the North. Would that have made a difference? Nicely written battle scene and would global history be different?
Review - 2020 3.5 stars. I really loved the premise of this book, and it was a lot of fun. Yes, some of the writing was better than others but I liked the format with an introduction before each short story with the actual historical events and then the alternative story, followed by an author's note and discussion questions.
Some of the stories were really interesting - like if Harold Hardrada hadn't lost at Stamford Bridge, Harold had been killed in that battle and Harold Hardrada was King of England (after he defeated William in the South!).
Review - 2020 3.5 stars. I really loved the premise of this book, and it was a lot of fun. Yes, some of the writing was better than others but I liked the format with an introduction before each short story with the actual historical events and then the alternative story, followed by an author's note and discussion questions.
Some of the stories were really interesting - like if Harold Hardrada hadn't lost at Stamford Bridge, Harold had been killed in that battle and Harold Hardrada was King of England (after he defeated William in the South!).
Read
December 4, 2017I admit that I imprinted on Sir Walter Scott's Ivanhoe as a child. When I grew older, I studied history. So I knew very well that 12th century England wasn't really a Norman vs. Saxon world as portrayed in Ivanhoe. Yet I also knew that William the Conqueror had imposed European feudalism on England which was a considerably more oppressive system than the Saxon Witan mentioned in the anthology that is the subject of this review, 1066 Turned Upside Down.
Because of the background described above, I have more emotional investment in stories that reverse the Norman Conquest than many other topics in alternate history. That's why I purchased the anthology when I first learned about it, but didn't read it until I found out that there was a Roma Nova story included in the collection. Roma Nova is an alternate history Roman colony that survived the Roman Empire created by Alison Morton. I reviewed two Roma Nova novels and a novella.
The Roma Nova story in 1066 Turned Upside Down is the first to take place before the 20th century. All the Roma Nova novels that have so far appeared either deal with 21st century protagonist Carina or are 20th century flashbacks to the life of her grandmother, Aurelia. "A Roman Intervenes" takes place in 1066. I was glad to see that Carina's ancestor, Galla Mitela, was just as capable of unorthodox improvisation in the service of her goals. In this case, her goal was the prevention of William of Normandy's invasion of England.
Also noteworthy was the feminist oriented tale "The Needle Can Mend" by Eliza Redgold in which women can be peace weavers and those who wove the Bayeux Tapestry could have introduced hidden messages. I had actually read a book of historical scholarship that argued for a subversive interpretation of the Bayeux Tapestry. So this story's controversial concept wasn't new to me, but it was the first time I'd seen it in a fictional context.
So I'm glad that I purchased 1066 Turned Upside Down. I consider it a worthwhile read.
For my complete review see http://shomeretmasked.blogspot.com/20...
Because of the background described above, I have more emotional investment in stories that reverse the Norman Conquest than many other topics in alternate history. That's why I purchased the anthology when I first learned about it, but didn't read it until I found out that there was a Roma Nova story included in the collection. Roma Nova is an alternate history Roman colony that survived the Roman Empire created by Alison Morton. I reviewed two Roma Nova novels and a novella.
The Roma Nova story in 1066 Turned Upside Down is the first to take place before the 20th century. All the Roma Nova novels that have so far appeared either deal with 21st century protagonist Carina or are 20th century flashbacks to the life of her grandmother, Aurelia. "A Roman Intervenes" takes place in 1066. I was glad to see that Carina's ancestor, Galla Mitela, was just as capable of unorthodox improvisation in the service of her goals. In this case, her goal was the prevention of William of Normandy's invasion of England.
Also noteworthy was the feminist oriented tale "The Needle Can Mend" by Eliza Redgold in which women can be peace weavers and those who wove the Bayeux Tapestry could have introduced hidden messages. I had actually read a book of historical scholarship that argued for a subversive interpretation of the Bayeux Tapestry. So this story's controversial concept wasn't new to me, but it was the first time I'd seen it in a fictional context.
So I'm glad that I purchased 1066 Turned Upside Down. I consider it a worthwhile read.
For my complete review see http://shomeretmasked.blogspot.com/20...
April 22, 2022
Oh, I do love an alternative perspective, and I love a 'What If?' - and this well-written collection provides both, with contributions from ten different authors. There are twelve stories in all, one for each month of the year 1066, each throwing a different perspective on the Battle of Hastings - from the death of Edward the Confessor and the naming of Harold Godwinson as his successor, through the events leading up to the Battle of Stamford Bridge where the English defeated Harald Hardrada but were left weakened and exhausted for the ensuing battle against William of Normandy, right up to William's final ousting of the teenage Edgar Atheling (hastily declared King of England following Harold's death) and his coronation as King of England in the newly built Westminster Abbey.
Each story asks the question 'What If?' What if Harald Hardrada had won at Stamford Bridge? What if William of Normandy's invasion plans had been thwarted at the outset? What if Harold Godwinson had been the victor at Hastings? What if Edgar Atheling had repelled the Normans at London Bridge, and been crowned King at Westminster instead of William?
There are plenty of memorable characters, including feisty women, both historical and fictional, giving their own unique perspectives on the events of a year that was a turning point in English history, and it all ends with an alternative reading of the Bayeux Tapestry. Brilliant stuff!
Each story asks the question 'What If?' What if Harald Hardrada had won at Stamford Bridge? What if William of Normandy's invasion plans had been thwarted at the outset? What if Harold Godwinson had been the victor at Hastings? What if Edgar Atheling had repelled the Normans at London Bridge, and been crowned King at Westminster instead of William?
There are plenty of memorable characters, including feisty women, both historical and fictional, giving their own unique perspectives on the events of a year that was a turning point in English history, and it all ends with an alternative reading of the Bayeux Tapestry. Brilliant stuff!
October 16, 2017
I loved this. Twelve richly imagined stories of 1066, varying in tone and viewpoint. I liked that each story (set in a particular month of that year) was prefaced with a description of the true events that took place. Warmly recommended if you like Alternative History and/or that period in particular.
June 19, 2024
A great collection of short stories or "chapters" that take place during that fateful year. My favorites were the sections by Joanne Courtney, Richard Dee, and Eliza Redgold. I liked Richard Dee's story so much that I told my husband he simply had to read it! A whole lot of fun!
March 17, 2017
If you enjoy revisionist historical fiction, then this is your next read. I enjoyed each of the stories, and will add this to my "Yep, I'll Read it Again" shelf. Each of the authors have written something on the events of 1066 or the period, and gave their own spin on the events. I particularly enjoyed the chronology and introductions to each of the stories. If I had to pick a favorite, though, it would be Holloway's story of the Battle on London Bridge.
April 29, 2021
1066 Turned Upside Down
An anthology with contributions by a number of authors
Reviewed February 2021
The victory of William of Normandy over Harold Godwinson at the Battle of Hastings profoundly changed English history. It introduced a French-speaking ruling class -- the Normans -- and through them, gave us the Angevins and the Plantagenets. These Norman conquerors brought with them new forms of architecture that can still be seen in cathedrals and castles they built, as well as a new form of ruling that we know as feudalism. But...what if Harold had won that day?
1066 Turned Upside Down presents us with a variety of alternate histories, from Harald Hardrada winning at Stamford Bridge to William of Normandy's navy being defeated while at sea and therefore never landing, with numerous other pivotal moments re-examined in between.
The writing styles and formats of the stories varies, which is to be expected when you have nine different authors contributing to the anthology. Because of this, I liked some stories more than others but that doesn't stop me from giving this book a 4 star rating because 1) the different stories gave me points to ponder, and 2) I often wish Harald Godwinson had won at Hastings!
An anthology with contributions by a number of authors
Reviewed February 2021
The victory of William of Normandy over Harold Godwinson at the Battle of Hastings profoundly changed English history. It introduced a French-speaking ruling class -- the Normans -- and through them, gave us the Angevins and the Plantagenets. These Norman conquerors brought with them new forms of architecture that can still be seen in cathedrals and castles they built, as well as a new form of ruling that we know as feudalism. But...what if Harold had won that day?
1066 Turned Upside Down presents us with a variety of alternate histories, from Harald Hardrada winning at Stamford Bridge to William of Normandy's navy being defeated while at sea and therefore never landing, with numerous other pivotal moments re-examined in between.
The writing styles and formats of the stories varies, which is to be expected when you have nine different authors contributing to the anthology. Because of this, I liked some stories more than others but that doesn't stop me from giving this book a 4 star rating because 1) the different stories gave me points to ponder, and 2) I often wish Harald Godwinson had won at Hastings!
August 8, 2016
1066 Turned Upside Down is a collaboration between nine historical fiction authors each bringing their own spin on an alternative happening of that fateful year in England's history, 1066. The nine authors are Joanna Courtney, Helen Hollick, Anna Belfrage, Richard Dee, G.K. Holloway, Carol McGrath, Alison Morton, Eliza Redgold, and Annie Whitehead.
Each month of that tumultuous year is featured with the subjects covering such momentous occasions as King Edward the Confessor dying and King Harold Godwinson being crowned, King Harald Hardrada's invasion of England, the comet seen in April, the Battle of London Bridge, and the stitching of the Bayeux Tapestry just to name a few. These topics are all written with a twist to the actual history and with each author bringing their own fabulous touches to weave an alternative tale.
I greatly enjoyed each story and reading each author's imaginative take on the events of 1066 and how while using quite a few actual facts of the time each author brought a totally believable tale of events.
Each month of that tumultuous year is featured with the subjects covering such momentous occasions as King Edward the Confessor dying and King Harold Godwinson being crowned, King Harald Hardrada's invasion of England, the comet seen in April, the Battle of London Bridge, and the stitching of the Bayeux Tapestry just to name a few. These topics are all written with a twist to the actual history and with each author bringing their own fabulous touches to weave an alternative tale.
I greatly enjoyed each story and reading each author's imaginative take on the events of 1066 and how while using quite a few actual facts of the time each author brought a totally believable tale of events.
February 25, 2020
1066 Turned Upside Down is a collection of short stories giving alternate endings to the Battle Hastings and other events leading up to the Norman conquest of England. The stories are sequential with each story taking on events on a different month of the year.
Helen Hollick:
The first book I read about this event was Morgan Llewellyn's The Wind from Hastings, but it was many years later that I got hooked on the era with Helen Hollick's Forever Queen and I am the Chosen King. She had two stories in the collection.
In "To Crown a King", Edgar Aetheling takes charge. Good story.
Harold defeats William at sea in her second story, "In the wake of the dolphin". Its based on a record of ships, indicating they may have headed to England earlier that year and been turned back.
Joanna Courtney:
I've been aware of her trilogy featuring the wives of contenders for the throne of England. Already being familiar with Edith and Matilda, I've been most interested in reading her book on Harald Hardrada's Queen. I'm more excited now as she wowed me with her first entry to this collection, "Emperor of the North".
I loved this story for showing the less significant invasion (since it was unsuccessful) and especially for going beyond the alternate battle ending and imagining the changes resulting from it in the following decades. Its the only story that did that and that's where the real fun of imagining alternate history lies.
Her second story, "Hold England Firm" is an alternate ending of the Battle of Hastings itself. Good story, I enjoyed the discussion afterwards of how the battle differed from others of the time and how close reinforcements had been.
Anne Belfrage:
In "Danish Crutch", Danish allies go after William in Normandy. I found this story a bit confusing. I did like it connecting Harold Godwinson to Norse family and allies. It seemed unbelievable that there's all these spies in Normandy, obvious to the Danish, but apparently not to William (?) and they don't seem to be accomplishing much. Although, I suppose spying in reality is more gathering intel than exciting action movie stuff.
DK Holloway:
In the Battle of London Bridge, Edgar Atheling comes into his own. Victory at this point, after defeat at the Battle of Hastings seems rather impossible, but the story is great.
Carol McGrath:
I previously read her book, "The Hand-Fasted Wife" about Edith Swan-neck. I like the subject matter, but the writing didn't pull me in. It has two sequels featuring their daughters. They're on my maybe list.
In "Dragon-Tailed Star", Harold's daughter Thea struggles with mixed feelings of pride and resentment when her father becomes king, but puts aside her mother to marry a more appropriate Queen. The writing again leaves me ambivalent, but it also fails as an alternate history. Its a completely made up event, but it doesn't change anything in the larger story.
Annie Whitehead:
In "A matter of trust", we get the point of view of Queen Edith's brothers Edwin and Morcar, erstwhile enemies of Harold. They win an earlier battle against Tostig, ending the Northern threat and leaving Harold only William to deal with. I liked this story for looking more ahead to whether England would stay united under Harold after defeating William.
Richard Dee:
"If you changed one thing" is a typical time travel story, nothing exciting or revelatory. At the end, we learn present-day King Aethel of Angeleland, direct descendant of Harold Godwinson, but there's no exploration of how this affects the world we live in.
Alison Morton:
"A Roman Intervenes" takes place in her Roma Nova universe. I remember looking at her series one day, but ultimately decided I wasn't interested. Roma Nova is alternate world where a part of the ancient Roman empire survives maintaining its pagan culture and ruled by women. The story didn't change my mind on the series. It feels like "Whee, Woman Warriors!" and I like that, loved the image of Galla and Claudia in their chainmaille, but the universe doesn't seem fleshed out well beyond that. I think religion would be playing a much bigger role and this would change the story greatly. Harold and William are both Christian from Christian nations, while Roma Nova is still pagan and Scandinavia is becoming more Christian, but still divided. William's wife Matilda may not have been a warrior, but she's also not a meek, dutiful wife as portrayed in this story. Don't demean actual female historical figures in favor of imaginary women warriors.
Eliza Redgold:
In the final story, "The needle can mend" Queen Edith makes the Bayeux Tapestry recording the events of William's conquest. I enjoyed the interactions between Queen Edith and her grandmother, the legendary Lady Godiva. I am quite curious to see the Bayeux Tapestry myself now. But this is another story that is historical fiction, but not alternate history.
Helen Hollick:
The first book I read about this event was Morgan Llewellyn's The Wind from Hastings, but it was many years later that I got hooked on the era with Helen Hollick's Forever Queen and I am the Chosen King. She had two stories in the collection.
In "To Crown a King", Edgar Aetheling takes charge. Good story.
Harold defeats William at sea in her second story, "In the wake of the dolphin". Its based on a record of ships, indicating they may have headed to England earlier that year and been turned back.
Joanna Courtney:
I've been aware of her trilogy featuring the wives of contenders for the throne of England. Already being familiar with Edith and Matilda, I've been most interested in reading her book on Harald Hardrada's Queen. I'm more excited now as she wowed me with her first entry to this collection, "Emperor of the North".
I loved this story for showing the less significant invasion (since it was unsuccessful) and especially for going beyond the alternate battle ending and imagining the changes resulting from it in the following decades. Its the only story that did that and that's where the real fun of imagining alternate history lies.
Her second story, "Hold England Firm" is an alternate ending of the Battle of Hastings itself. Good story, I enjoyed the discussion afterwards of how the battle differed from others of the time and how close reinforcements had been.
Anne Belfrage:
In "Danish Crutch", Danish allies go after William in Normandy. I found this story a bit confusing. I did like it connecting Harold Godwinson to Norse family and allies. It seemed unbelievable that there's all these spies in Normandy, obvious to the Danish, but apparently not to William (?) and they don't seem to be accomplishing much. Although, I suppose spying in reality is more gathering intel than exciting action movie stuff.
DK Holloway:
In the Battle of London Bridge, Edgar Atheling comes into his own. Victory at this point, after defeat at the Battle of Hastings seems rather impossible, but the story is great.
Carol McGrath:
I previously read her book, "The Hand-Fasted Wife" about Edith Swan-neck. I like the subject matter, but the writing didn't pull me in. It has two sequels featuring their daughters. They're on my maybe list.
In "Dragon-Tailed Star", Harold's daughter Thea struggles with mixed feelings of pride and resentment when her father becomes king, but puts aside her mother to marry a more appropriate Queen. The writing again leaves me ambivalent, but it also fails as an alternate history. Its a completely made up event, but it doesn't change anything in the larger story.
Annie Whitehead:
In "A matter of trust", we get the point of view of Queen Edith's brothers Edwin and Morcar, erstwhile enemies of Harold. They win an earlier battle against Tostig, ending the Northern threat and leaving Harold only William to deal with. I liked this story for looking more ahead to whether England would stay united under Harold after defeating William.
Richard Dee:
"If you changed one thing" is a typical time travel story, nothing exciting or revelatory. At the end, we learn present-day King Aethel of Angeleland, direct descendant of Harold Godwinson, but there's no exploration of how this affects the world we live in.
Alison Morton:
"A Roman Intervenes" takes place in her Roma Nova universe. I remember looking at her series one day, but ultimately decided I wasn't interested. Roma Nova is alternate world where a part of the ancient Roman empire survives maintaining its pagan culture and ruled by women. The story didn't change my mind on the series. It feels like "Whee, Woman Warriors!" and I like that, loved the image of Galla and Claudia in their chainmaille, but the universe doesn't seem fleshed out well beyond that. I think religion would be playing a much bigger role and this would change the story greatly. Harold and William are both Christian from Christian nations, while Roma Nova is still pagan and Scandinavia is becoming more Christian, but still divided. William's wife Matilda may not have been a warrior, but she's also not a meek, dutiful wife as portrayed in this story. Don't demean actual female historical figures in favor of imaginary women warriors.
Eliza Redgold:
In the final story, "The needle can mend" Queen Edith makes the Bayeux Tapestry recording the events of William's conquest. I enjoyed the interactions between Queen Edith and her grandmother, the legendary Lady Godiva. I am quite curious to see the Bayeux Tapestry myself now. But this is another story that is historical fiction, but not alternate history.
October 17, 2022
On my side of the pond, the history lessons I grew up with were woefully inadequate when it came to England. My college Western Civ history began with the Renaissance, as though nothing that came before either was known or would have mattered. I knew nothing about the Norman Conquest or the tribes and kingdoms that had preceded it across the British Isles.
I’ve been filling this gap in the last few years with marvelous history and historical fiction by, among others, Annie Whitehead and Helen Hollick. Annie Whitehead’s Alvar the Kingmaker, suspenseful and rich with cultural details, brings us up to the accession of Æthelred the Unready (978-1016). And Æthelred’s second wife, Queen Emma (984-1052), comes alive in Helen Hollick’s engaging The Forever Queen. It is Emma’s son, Edward the confessor, whose lack of offspring sets the stage for the Norman invasion of 1066 – and it is Emma’s grand nephew, William the Conqueror, who ultimately won the Battle of Hastings, now being turned upside down in fiction.
So I was intrigued a while back as I scrolled through my morning Triberr posts to discover the title 1066 Turned Upside Down, and further thrilled to realize I was familiar with some of its authors. It takes a special talent to make history come alive, and the nine authors who’ve contributed to this work have succeeded marvelously. The book is organized chronologically and examines nine turning points in the autumn of 1066, any one of which could easily have had a different outcome. Each chapter creates a compelling narrative of that different outcome and its consequences.
The stories make great reading, and I was struck that they would be an excellent resource for middle school or high school students to soak up the history that hangs by a thread. But they are also delightful reading at any age. The players were already familiar to me though my earlier reading, and I was entertained and intrigued to explore their actions and motivations at each twist of the story.
I’ve been filling this gap in the last few years with marvelous history and historical fiction by, among others, Annie Whitehead and Helen Hollick. Annie Whitehead’s Alvar the Kingmaker, suspenseful and rich with cultural details, brings us up to the accession of Æthelred the Unready (978-1016). And Æthelred’s second wife, Queen Emma (984-1052), comes alive in Helen Hollick’s engaging The Forever Queen. It is Emma’s son, Edward the confessor, whose lack of offspring sets the stage for the Norman invasion of 1066 – and it is Emma’s grand nephew, William the Conqueror, who ultimately won the Battle of Hastings, now being turned upside down in fiction.
So I was intrigued a while back as I scrolled through my morning Triberr posts to discover the title 1066 Turned Upside Down, and further thrilled to realize I was familiar with some of its authors. It takes a special talent to make history come alive, and the nine authors who’ve contributed to this work have succeeded marvelously. The book is organized chronologically and examines nine turning points in the autumn of 1066, any one of which could easily have had a different outcome. Each chapter creates a compelling narrative of that different outcome and its consequences.
The stories make great reading, and I was struck that they would be an excellent resource for middle school or high school students to soak up the history that hangs by a thread. But they are also delightful reading at any age. The players were already familiar to me though my earlier reading, and I was entertained and intrigued to explore their actions and motivations at each twist of the story.
December 2, 2016
A Superb Collaboration
This interesting alternative history of England’s tumultuous year 1066 is a collaboration of nine authors, each a successful writer of his/her own historical fiction novels: Joanna Courtney, Helen Hollick, Anna Belfrage, Richard Dee, G.K. Holloway, Carol McGrath, Alison Morton, Eliza Redgold, and Annie Whitehead.
In 1066 Turned Upside Down, each writer envisions a fascinating “what if” version about that fateful year in England's history. And with each outcome, modern man would have inherited a much different world, in some instances giving rise to my notion of “too bad it didn’t happen that way.”
I must confess to not knowing much about this time in England’s long history. However, having read James M. Hockey’s excellent “Edith Fair as a Swan: Tales of Bowdyn 3” (an excellent series, by the way), I was at least familiar with King Harold’s “common wife Edith.”
Because of this, and the excellent Foreword by C. C. Humphreys, I enjoyed the “what if” scenario in 1066 even more.
This interesting alternative history of England’s tumultuous year 1066 is a collaboration of nine authors, each a successful writer of his/her own historical fiction novels: Joanna Courtney, Helen Hollick, Anna Belfrage, Richard Dee, G.K. Holloway, Carol McGrath, Alison Morton, Eliza Redgold, and Annie Whitehead.
In 1066 Turned Upside Down, each writer envisions a fascinating “what if” version about that fateful year in England's history. And with each outcome, modern man would have inherited a much different world, in some instances giving rise to my notion of “too bad it didn’t happen that way.”
I must confess to not knowing much about this time in England’s long history. However, having read James M. Hockey’s excellent “Edith Fair as a Swan: Tales of Bowdyn 3” (an excellent series, by the way), I was at least familiar with King Harold’s “common wife Edith.”
Because of this, and the excellent Foreword by C. C. Humphreys, I enjoyed the “what if” scenario in 1066 even more.
July 3, 2017
I tend to love these what-could-have-happened books about history. I just like the idea, which happens to be true, that history turns on the smallest things sometimes, and that what actually happened could easily have turned very differently. There's a lot to be said for luck and the impact of decisions that people make, deliberately and by happenstance. So fake history is kind of fun. What if Eisenhower's weather forecast had been botched on D-Day? What if the JFK had happened to duck? What if Lincoln decided not to go to the theater? What if Aaron Burr had missed? What if Caesar had gone fishing instead of to the Senate? On all such things, the world turns.
Anyway, this alternative history of 1066 has its moments, but generally, given the amazing potential for something fascinating, it commits the worse sin for writers and biggest problem for readers: it's boring. It has no zing, no zest, no spice, nothing much for pages upon pages. There's no point in churning out historical might-have-beens that offer only the thinnest of gruels.
Anyway, this alternative history of 1066 has its moments, but generally, given the amazing potential for something fascinating, it commits the worse sin for writers and biggest problem for readers: it's boring. It has no zing, no zest, no spice, nothing much for pages upon pages. There's no point in churning out historical might-have-beens that offer only the thinnest of gruels.
March 9, 2020
I was expecting more from this anthology: in particular I was hoping for more extensive alternative history, which examined the future of England had William the Bastard not won The Battle of Hastings. These stories mostly focus on the actual battle with nothing much about what an 'English' England would have been like without the Norman conquest. Only 'Emperor of the North' examines this and then only fleetingly. 'If You Changed One Thing' is a rather trite time-travel story that doesn't follow through its implications: if one travelled back in time and prevented the Norman conquest, when you returned you would not be speaking contemporary English.
Though informative about the political situations around 1066, these stories do not really examine the premise of alternative history with any great depth.
Though informative about the political situations around 1066, these stories do not really examine the premise of alternative history with any great depth.
January 25, 2022
A collection of stories-part fiction, part history in which the onset to the Battle of Hastings or the battle itself turned out a different way. How would it change the world today, where would we be and who would rule?
I’m not usually into playing the “what if” game but it was interesting to gain insight as to how other’s think. Each story was intriguing in its own way, I even enjoyed the one with a time machine but what I mostly gained from all this is how one small act can make a difference. If only Harold would’ve waited and not charged heedlessly into battle, maybe he would’ve held onto his kingdom. There are many different instances in history where we wonder “what if” and I appreciate the effort all the authors took into their versions. Very good read!
I’m not usually into playing the “what if” game but it was interesting to gain insight as to how other’s think. Each story was intriguing in its own way, I even enjoyed the one with a time machine but what I mostly gained from all this is how one small act can make a difference. If only Harold would’ve waited and not charged heedlessly into battle, maybe he would’ve held onto his kingdom. There are many different instances in history where we wonder “what if” and I appreciate the effort all the authors took into their versions. Very good read!
March 11, 2017
As a history addict, I’ve been fascinated by alternative histories for decades so when I saw this collection was being released, I had to read it. However, I delayed delving into this until my own alternative history had evolved. I was not disappointed with any of these tales as they all took different approaches and in their own styles.
In most cases, the characters were based on the historical records, although those sometimes disagree so there was room for subtle variations – as well as believable fictional creations. Sometimes the background characters in the historical panorama have the most interesting tale to tell. As I’m part-British, I kept rooting for Harold and disliked William so cheered when the Normans were thwarted by their enemies.
However, I must admit to having a Viking bias so my favourite tale was Joanna Courtney’s ‘Emperor of the North’ about King Harold Hardrada, closely followed by Anna Belfrage’s ‘The Danish Crutch’ – never discount a ‘cripple’ (or else I’ll run you over with my wheelchair).
But there were moments when I laughed as well as cried, and all the stories had me nodding with enjoyment and reading avidly. There is even an amusing and clever science fiction/time travel spin in Richard Dee’s ‘If You Changed One Thing’, and I must mention Alison Morton’s ‘A Roman Intervenes’ when her own alternative Roma Nova world impacts on events.
The collection is assembled in such a way that between the ‘alternatives’ are the related facts as they happened, as far as historians and archaeologists know – which still leaves room for these experienced writers’ imaginations. After each tale, there are interesting points of discussion to make the reader pursue the thoughts raised.
In many cases, I now have a list of books to keep me historically entertained for months – if I don’t just keep re-reading this collection of five-star tales.
In most cases, the characters were based on the historical records, although those sometimes disagree so there was room for subtle variations – as well as believable fictional creations. Sometimes the background characters in the historical panorama have the most interesting tale to tell. As I’m part-British, I kept rooting for Harold and disliked William so cheered when the Normans were thwarted by their enemies.
However, I must admit to having a Viking bias so my favourite tale was Joanna Courtney’s ‘Emperor of the North’ about King Harold Hardrada, closely followed by Anna Belfrage’s ‘The Danish Crutch’ – never discount a ‘cripple’ (or else I’ll run you over with my wheelchair).
But there were moments when I laughed as well as cried, and all the stories had me nodding with enjoyment and reading avidly. There is even an amusing and clever science fiction/time travel spin in Richard Dee’s ‘If You Changed One Thing’, and I must mention Alison Morton’s ‘A Roman Intervenes’ when her own alternative Roma Nova world impacts on events.
The collection is assembled in such a way that between the ‘alternatives’ are the related facts as they happened, as far as historians and archaeologists know – which still leaves room for these experienced writers’ imaginations. After each tale, there are interesting points of discussion to make the reader pursue the thoughts raised.
In many cases, I now have a list of books to keep me historically entertained for months – if I don’t just keep re-reading this collection of five-star tales.
February 19, 2017
This was an extremely enjoyable collection of counter-factual histories surrounding what's arguably the most critical date in English history. Some are rather more believable than others - for example the Norse assassination team sent to kill Duke William stretches credibility almost to breaking point. Others have a more believable point of departure. For example, in reality the Norse army at Stamford Bridge was caught out by Harold Godwinson's fast marching army and surprised whilst sunbathing without its armour on the banks of the Derwent. A reinforced and well-prepared army awaits the exhausted Saxons in this story and the outcome is very different.
Definitely worth a try if you fancy some light but generally well-produced alternative history.
Definitely worth a try if you fancy some light but generally well-produced alternative history.
August 30, 2017
I really enjoyed this collection of short stories exploring several ways that 1066 could have turned out differently for England. Not only if Harold Godwinson hadn't been shot in the eye with an arrow on October 14. If he had waited for his Northern reinforcements before engaging, if William had been routed at sea in the crossing, if the Norwegians had beaten him in the earlier battle.... All interesting to contemplate. And I have discovered some new authors, in addition to reading some familiar ones.
April 18, 2024
In the U. S., we only learn of another country's history as it relates to us. (Snobs, aren't we?) All I know of Britain's history I learned in Horrible Histories. I highly recommended this TV program!
This book is a short story collection of alternative histories, all relating to 1066, Harold and William, and the Battle of Hastings.
It's fantastic! Different authors changing a few, or just one, fact to change the whole story!
Most short story collections are a bit uneven. You'll get a few good stories and a lot of mediocre stories. In this books, all stories are excellent!
This book is a short story collection of alternative histories, all relating to 1066, Harold and William, and the Battle of Hastings.
It's fantastic! Different authors changing a few, or just one, fact to change the whole story!
Most short story collections are a bit uneven. You'll get a few good stories and a lot of mediocre stories. In this books, all stories are excellent!
July 17, 2021
This a history of the year 1066 where each author takes an event of the year and changes the outcome to allow Harold to survive and reign. As with many short stories i like some and not others. The best was in fact that most improbably were a student from the future time travels to the past to alter the outcome. I wanted more continuity perhaps it would have been better if each author carried forward the smaller changes to create a whole new continuous narrative
July 18, 2018
Competent
The stories, except for Anne Morton's, show plausible alterations to history, but only one explores the world created when 2066 is turned upside down. They are readable but don't have huge literary flsir. This is a book you can kill a bit of time with, but it won't Rick your world.
The stories, except for Anne Morton's, show plausible alterations to history, but only one explores the world created when 2066 is turned upside down. They are readable but don't have huge literary flsir. This is a book you can kill a bit of time with, but it won't Rick your world.
August 16, 2022
Fantastic stories
These 12 stories are as varied as the authors who wrote them, each with an intriguing twist to the tale that is 1066. In this most significant year in English (and Norman) history, it's really interesting to see what little change could have effected such great change in the long run. Well done to every author for coming up with such diverse possibilities!
These 12 stories are as varied as the authors who wrote them, each with an intriguing twist to the tale that is 1066. In this most significant year in English (and Norman) history, it's really interesting to see what little change could have effected such great change in the long run. Well done to every author for coming up with such diverse possibilities!
October 15, 2017
3.5 stars. Really interesting. I wish some of the stories were longer
November 1, 2022
2.5
Some good, some bad, a couple that were excellent. You know the drill: popcorn and candyfloss.
Some good, some bad, a couple that were excellent. You know the drill: popcorn and candyfloss.
December 31, 2022
If only …
February 17, 2018
5 stars - no question.
Fascinating vignettes of what might have been if the fickle currents of time had been subtlety altered to give us a significantly different outcome to that epoch defining year of 1066.
Fascinating vignettes of what might have been if the fickle currents of time had been subtlety altered to give us a significantly different outcome to that epoch defining year of 1066.
April 8, 2023
Loved this as a genre. Wonder what other historical events could be given the "what if?" treatment?
Displaying 1 - 30 of 45 reviews