I was excited to read this book because I love biographies and I love books about psychedelia, drugs, outliers, and the counterculture of the 1960s. When I was in college, I read Robert Greenfield's biography of Timothy Leary, which is much larger than this book and a lot more dense.
It's an easy read, which is disappointing. At times I felt like I was reading a book targeted to young adults. The prose is simple, the chapters short, and the stories are brief throughout.
The MAJORITY of this book is taken from interviews Greenfield did with Owsley himself, Bob Weir, Dennis McNally (The Grateful Dead's official biographer), and a number of other people from the scene. Heavy quotations throughout of direct dialog from "Bear" are the bulk of each chapter. Compared to Leary's biography--which was rich, had a lot more details, and was much longer--this book almost felt like a cop out. I have no doubt that Greenfield did ample reporting. He cites all materials used. But I wasn't impressed by this whatsoever. It's more like a great love story to a phenomenal character of life.
The content is fascinating and Greenfield beautifully sums up Owsley's impact on culture right at the end: "While Bear's true final resting place would always be in the music that he had done all he could to help the Grateful Dead create, the trajectory of his utterly unconventional yet completely American life spoke volumes about the limits of personal freedom in this country. As an outlier from birth who became an outlaw in the eyes of a society that perceived him as a distinct threat to the status quo, Bear was someone to whom the ordinary rules of behavior never applied."
A short 218 pages, it fills in a lot of holes about the Grateful Dead's source of LSD and money in the beginning of their career. Good biography that could've been better based on what I've seen Greenfield do in the past as a biographer. I almost wish Bear would've written it himself. Although he's quoted so much that he practically did. To play devil's advocate, there is so much material on the culture of the Grateful Dead, the men themselves, and the music that "Bear" isn't taking liberties by repeating them. Greenfield *does* stick to the point but without the backdrop of the epic Grateful Dead, it nearly loses its context. Knowledge of the band and their scene seem necessary for a reader to get a lot out of this one.