This novella was an incredible disappointment.
I took this book out of the library with high expectations. After all, I LOVED Disney's Beauty and the Beast and really enjoyed Valentino's graphic novels (particularly Nightmares & Fairy Tales), so I really couldn't see how this would go wrong. Ho boy.
(Fair warnings - I marked this review with a spoiler tag, but I will say anyway that I will be spoiling the heck out of this novella. I'm sorry, but there are points I really want to bring up. If you don't want spoilers, please skip this review.)
Writing - the writing was incredibly bland and simplistic. Valentino violated "Show, Don't Tell" so badly, it made me cringe. We're always flat-out told if the characters are angry or upset or worried or happy or whatever. There are few actual indicators through their behavior or actions. In fact, the writing was so basic that it reminded me of those grade school-level readers that give very simple retellings of movies.
In all fairness, I know this wasn't written for adults. But it also wasn't written for children. If the fact it was for sale in the YA section of Barnes & Noble doesn't prove that, the unnecessarily excessive description of the Beast ripping wolves to pieces should.
The narrative also can't seem to decide on a voice. There's a paragraph or so that seems to be deliberately anachronistic (among other things, it asks "what's up with that?" of the readers), but the rest tries to sound ye olde timey. There are needlessly difficult words thrown in the basic prose. The POV, which is third-person limited (third-person but sticks with one person's POV at a time), jumps between characters without a natural breaking point. There were also several points when the audience was directly addressed by the narrator with "you", which came out of left field and made me think back on my high school writing workshops and cry.
Plot - The plot is a mess. Valentino couldn't seem to decide if she wanted to follow the movie plot with a "this is what happened behind the scenes" thing going or whether she wanted to make everything up. So we get plenty of things that blatantly contradict the movie (for example, the Enchantress was the Prince's fiancee and cursed him for dumping her because she was a peasant, not for seemingly refusing an old woman shelter) but also weird attempts to show things adhere to canon (the Prince throws a kingdom-wide ball where he sees Belle from behind and goes to talk to her, but JUST HAPPENS to be convinced by Gaston not to speak to her).
A lot o the story is dedicated to the Beast's time as the Prince, before he was cursed. That's fine... except the movie's story is put on hold for a good chunk of time as the Beast passes out and remembers/dreams about it (which makes little sense, considering he explicitly FORGETS his past for reasons never actually explained) and we get to read about the Prince abusively romancing a naive girl named Princess Tulip Morningstar (no, REALLY) after the Enchantress curses him. Valentino is clearly trying to establish a feeling of panic and doom for the Prince, but the aforementioned bland writing kind of ruins that. Also, the Prince doesn't transform right away. He does so gradually, in proportion to the cruel deeds he does. This could be interesting, except (A) it means we get countless chapters of him insisting he Totally Isn't Cursed (right) and (B) the descriptions of the start of his transformation are... getting age lines on his face. That's it. No mention of his hair getting wilder or his teeth and nails getting sharper. Perhaps I'm having trouble visualizing it, but if I was told that a human would gradually transform into Disney's version of the Beast, I would not imagine age lines as the first stage. Not to mention, besides being vaguely ageist, it's a massive letdown from how the movie revolutionized the image of the Beast.
Most of the flashback is spent repeating events to show that (A) the Prince is a dick, (B) he and Gaston are BFFs, (C) both of them used to be sweet kids but got to be jerks for some reason, and (D) the Prince is abusive to his new fiancee. I never found myself particularly caring much for it and just was really bored for most of it. Considering how little backstory we get for the Beast, that really is disappointing. Valentino had so many options, and she just went for, "The Prince drinks, hunts, flirts with girls, yells at his fiancee, and drives everyone away when he's clearly cursed". We also get very little of the servants in this time, which is doubly a let-down since they are virtually nonexistent in the movie's time.
When we get back to the movie's events, most of them are glossed over. Among them:
- Belle's refusal to come to dinner has the Beast overhearing her telling Lumiere she won't go. He just snarls "If she doesn't eat with me, then she doesn't eat at all!" to thin air and storms off. They don't even interact.
- Belle being scared by the Beast in the West Wing is summed up in several sentences. His actually fighting off the wolves gets one. (On the other hand, Belle's purple description of the Beast himself goes on for quite awhile.)
- The "Something There" montage is almost entirely skipped and summed up by the Odd Sisters screaming about how Belle and the Beast are now in love.
- The "Beauty and the Beast" ballroom scene is skipped entirely.
- The ending scene is almost entirely glossed over in favor of the Enchantress fighting with her sisters. Belle's line - "I love you" - is kept just so the Enchantress can make a point.
Anyone who enjoyed those scenes and would have liked to know how they were from the Beast's POV will be severely let down. It doesn't help that when we get to the movie's events, the story shifts to focus almost entirely on the Odd Sisters.
On one final note, I'm not sure how Valentino envisioned the timeline. The Prince was explicitly given until he turned 21 to break the curse. By the time the flashback is ending, the Beast and the servants are forgetting parts of their past lives that are very close (the Beast has entirely forgotten Gaston, who's supposed to be his best friend) and people who knew the Beast are forgetting him (Gaston completely forgets the Beast's castle, despite GROWING UP THERE). This would seem to be a part of the curse, except it's never mentioned when the Enchantress casts it and it makes no sense for her to have the Beast forget the very deeds she wants him to atone for. If it was forgetting because so much time has passed though, that makes even less sense. We don't know how old the Prince is when he's cursed, but he's old enough to be married. I can't believe that more than a few years have passed at MOST before he begins to forget significant people in his life.
Characters - If you liked the movie's characters, this novella is really not going to sit well with you. To sum things up as best I can, *clears throat*
For starters, the characters in the flashback act incredibly different from their movie selves. While this is understandable (the novella is supposed to cover their changes in character, after all), it just feels off. For example, the flashback has the Prince and Gaston as the "best of friends", constantly referring to each other as "old friend", Gaston practically living in the castle with the Prince (including the time the Prince wants a romantic visit from his fiancee!), and mentions of them playing together as children and a never-explained backstory of Gaston saving the Prince's life. The story implies that the two are more like frenemies than actual friends, but most of the cruelty seems to come from the Prince's side. Gaston himself is only ever sincere. He warns the Prince that his fiancee is not who she appears to be. He helps the Prince put together a ball and introduces him to Princess Tulip. He calms the Prince when he's out of control, handles diplomatic meetings in the Prince's absence (which I doubt would be allowed), and is generally portrayed as being level-headed as the Prince goes insane.
When the story jumps to the movie's events though, Gaston is his canon self. In fact, he's a two-dimensional version of his canon self, since he doesn't even show his more cunning, ruthless side. He just seems to be there Because.
The Prince/the Beast's characterization is disgraceful. In the movie, he started off being "spoiled, selfish, and unkind", fell into a deep depression over the curse, and proved himself to be a better person through his interactions with Belle. Valentino went WAAAAAY overboard with his pre-cursed self. It's obvious she just decided to make him Gaston 2.0, right down to having him think how he likes girls who don't read or have thoughts or opinions of their own. He also considers spending time in Belle's village to be the height of fun, despite it clearly being shown as "provincial" and tiny in the movie.
Besides abusing his second fiancee, cruelly dumping his first for being a peasant, and spending all of his time spending tax money on booze and women, we see the Prince drive Princess Tulip's family to ruin and ORDER A HIT ON SOMEONE. Really! He asks Gaston to arrange for someone to kill a master painter, because he thinks the guy made him look too old in a portrait! And this is never brought up again! Never! In fact, none of the horrible things he does pre-curse are, which makes the idea of him being redeemed laughable. He just angsts a lot as the Beast, which gets tiresome quickly. We also find out that he wanted to kill Belle in a monstrous rage over her being in the West Wing and the wolves just distracted him from it, so between that and his sweet scenes with her being skipped, he doesn't come out looking good at all.
Most of the other characters from the movie play such a small part that they're hardly present. The servants do very little, especially since the curse somehow leaves the Beast unable to see them as living (which contradicts the movie MASSIVELY). Belle herself is almost a nonentity. Like I said, we skip the scenes of her standing up to the Beast and Gaston. Her big scene is when she's attacked by the wolves. Here, instead of riding her horse off and driving off the wolves for as long as she can, she runs into the woods on foot and sits there like a rock (or Bella Swan) as the wolves swarm her. Princess Tulip is meant to serve as a deconstruction of princess classic characters, but is pretty much just abused and dealt with off-page (though she's the only one I felt at all sorry for).
Then, there's the Enchantress (Circe, here) and her sisters, the three witches. It's painfully obvious which characters Valentino liked best. Those are the four who get the most pagetime and EVERYTHING done in the movies is attributed to them. Circe's test of character for the Prince? Her sisters' idea. The wolves attacking Belle? The witches sent 'em. Belle wanting to go back to her dad? The witches put the idea in her head. Gaston having Maurice committed to blackmail Belle? The witches not only tell him to do it, they personally introduce him to their old friend, the asylum head. As for Circe butting in, remember how Belle's love saved the Prince's life? Yeeeeeah...
The witches irritated me to no end. I get what Valentino was going for with them and I suspect they'd work better in visual format, but reading over and over and OVER how they wore boots and had "baby-doll mouths" and seeing them screech and finish each other's sentences and constantly interrupt to make "cryptic" comments (most of which were awkward references to the Snow White novella) just screwed up the narrative flow and REALLY annoyed me. It felt like the equivalent of trying to have a conversation while three small children are punching your legs and screaming and interrupting and laughing at their own jokes. I must admit, I admire Circe's inner fortitude for putting up with them. If I had to live with those three, I'd have done something drastic.
I think the worst part about the witches is that they're played up like they're so damned important. All notable plot twists from the movie are attributed to them. The Beast constantly goes on about how terrifying they are. He eventually starts describing his transformation as the "witches' curse", ignoring the fact that CIRCE was the one who cast it. There's one chapter dedicated to the witches talking about their involvement with Snow White's stepmother and also Ursula the Sea Witch, who of course is one of their friends. This is of no relevance to the story of Belle and the Beast, but it does spend all its time showing off the witches.
The people reading this novella are here for the characters from BATB. That's who they want to read about, not three witches. Even worse, despite them being treated as so involved in the story, it's pretty clear they don't matter all that much. It's contrived enough to believe they planned the entire climax (the movie showed that those events only happened because of several spontaneous decisions the characters made), but the witches themselves, despite their power, don't DO anything to actually alter the story's events. They want Belle out of the way to ensure that the Beast is cursed forever, but when their first attempt (to kill her with the wolves) fails, they decide to tell Gaston where Belle is... and only get around to that several chapters later, after spying on Belle and the Beast falling in love and wringing their hands and screeching over how they have no idea how to stop it. They DID have an idea, though! For some reason (that is, they were following the movie), they just held off on bringing in Gaston until later. It apparently never occurred to them to use their vast magic to send more wolves after Belle or start a fire while she slept or stop her heart or turn her to stone or any countless number of things. It's not even like the power of love is protecting Belle, since they later enchant her to want to see her father. Even if magic was out of the question though, they had plenty of other options. If they were friends with the asylum head, for instance, why bother with Gaston at all? Why not just call in a favor and ask for Belle herself to be involuntarily committed?
Circe gets a larger role than in the movie, which is a good idea. The Enchantress is a character who raises a lot of questions (like, did she actually curse an 11-year-old kid for not inviting a stranger in), but her development here just had me raising an eyebrow. She somehow fell in love with the Prince (despite, as I pointed out above, he was very obviously Proto-Gaston) and they got engaged, but their relationship is skipped over entirely. It's implied the Prince truly loved her, but we never see why (and he also comes across as a massive idiot for being surprised that a girl he met in Belle's tiny little village was a peasant, OH, IMAGINE THAT!)
She curses the Prince for cruelly dumping her because of her social status (all while her sisters laugh about the idea of Circe being a peasant because she's actually a real fairy princess, hello double standards!) and then proceeds to not pay any attention to him at all. She doesn't even consider checking on his progress until she learns that her sisters went behind her back and spied on him. Speaking of which, she knows they're spying on the Prince and hate him and repeatedly asks them to knock it off, but then is taken by surprise when they sidestep her questions and offer her a magic necklace which, surprise, surprise, keeps her incapacitated while they try to kill the Beast. It's also worth noting that in failing to keep an eye on the arrogant, somewhat violent man who she put a life-shattering curse on, she didn't realize that he ruined Princess Tulip's life and family until it was almost too late for her to help them. She also is just kinda sad to hear that changing a guy into a monster and not offering further guidance didn't cause him to be a better person and STILL makes no attempt to do anything until the last few pages of the story, when she shows up to steal Belle's thunder.
I will finish this by saying that I have not read the novella about Snow White's stepmother, which I've heard lots of people speak well of. Maybe this one was just a fluke. Maybe it was easier for Valentino to write for Disney's Snow White since that movie had considerably less in way of characters and plot to work around. I don't know. I do want to read the Snow White novella, if only to see if it turned out any better. One can only hope.
In the meantime, I recommend that anyone who wants a version of BATB from the Beast's perspective read "Beastly", by Alex Flinn.