Virginity: A Positive Approach to Celibacy for the Sake of the Kingdom of Heaven, by Raniero Cantalamessa, presents itself as a gentle, reassuring defense of celibacy, but beneath its polite tone lies a deeply flawed metaphysical foundation. The book frames chastity as an act of obedience to an external authority and a deferred reward system aimed at an abstract afterlife called the “Kingdom of Heaven.” Its language is pastoral, moralistic, and sentimental, but it is entirely non-operational. It offers exhortation without technology, devotion without method, and discipline without science. What it ultimately delivers is not liberation, but repression dressed up as virtue.
I write this as someone who has practiced chastity for four years and who spent the majority of his life enslaved by lust. I did not overcome lust through belief in an external savior, nor through fear of punishment or promise of paradise. I overcame it through conscious self-mastery. Chastity, when it is real, is not performed for a God, a priesthood, or a postmortem reward. Least of all for a so-called God, a jealous, fear-mongering, authoritarian deity fashioned by institutions that have ruled through guilt, terror, bloodshed, and psychological enslavement, a God-image historically used to justify genocide, persecution, crusades, inquisitions, and the mass repression of human potential. Chastity in its purest and most authentic form is undertaken for the evolution of consciousness itself. It is for mental clarity, physical vitality, emotional sovereignty, and spiritual power. Any system that divorces chastity from personal transformation and locates its purpose outside the individual is already corrupt at the root.
There are two forms of celibacy: solar and lunar. Solar celibacy is conscious, creative, and alchemical. It teaches the practitioner how to transmute preserved sexual energy, raise it up the spine, refine it through discipline, and express it through higher faculties such as intellect, creativity, and will. This is precisely what is taught in the Vedic and Hindu tradition through the institutionalized discipline of brahmacharya, which explicitly trains the individual to control the mind, sublimate sexual force, and convert it into spiritual, intellectual, and creative power. In this regard, the Eastern system is categorically superior to institutional Christian celibacy. Lunar celibacy, by contrast, is suppressive and devotional. It commands abstinence while providing no method for energetic transformation. This book is a textbook example of lunar celibacy. It says, in essence, “Do not engage, because God commands it,” but it never teaches how to transmute the enormous force being restrained. This is precisely why institutional Christian celibacy has collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions.
The data exposes this failure with surgical clarity. Fifty four percent of practicing Christians consume pornography. Seventy five percent of Christian men and forty percent of Christian women watch it. Twenty two percent of Christians view pornography weekly. Sixty seven percent of pastors have a personal history with pornography, and eighteen percent currently struggle with it, while only seven percent of churches offer any structured help. This is not accidental. This is the predictable outcome of lunar celibacy. A system that demonizes sexual force while refusing to teach its transmutation produces hypocrisy, neurosis, and secret addiction. The same institutions that shout about sin and salvation collapse in private before the very impulses they refuse to understand.
The author’s discussion of the “mortification of the eyes” perfectly illustrates this problem. He cites Jesus’ statement from Matthew 6:22–23, “The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eye is clear, your whole body will be filled with light. But if your eye is not, your whole body will be filled with darkness,” and then proceeds to interpret this passage as a warning against external images and visual stimulation, treating the word eye as plural and outward-facing. This is a complete esoteric misreading. The saying refers not to the physical eyes, nor to external imagery, but to the single eye, the inner eye, the third eye. In the esoteric tradition, this faculty is activated through the transmutation of sexual energy and its ascent up the spine, illuminating the nervous system and awakening higher perception. When this inner eye is opened, the body does indeed become filled with light. When it remains dormant, the individual remains in spiritual darkness and ignorance. By reducing this inner alchemical teaching to a moral lecture about external images, the author strips the passage of its actual meaning and neutralizes its transformative power.
In the end, this work does not advance chastity; it sabotages it. It preserves the shell while killing the science. It replaces self-sovereignty with submission and transformation with moral theater. For anyone serious about overcoming lust, cultivating power, and awakening higher consciousness, this book offers nothing of value. It represents the failure of lunar religion to grasp solar law. My rating is one out of five, not because chastity is wrong, but because this book misunderstands it at every critical level.