2.5 stars —it’s clearly okay and as an introduction for some readers it might well deserve more stars. The stars are for me personally, but I am probably not the target reader. I don’t like the star system.
If sustainability were simple (as this 2017 title suggests), wouldn’t our communities, workplaces, schools, organizations, hospitals, trucks, cars, trains, airplanes, farms, grocery stores, businesses, religious institutions (churches, mosques, synagogues), homes and individual actions look quite different?
Wouldn’t we communally be reducing our greenhouse gas emissions faster?
Wouldn’t way more of the products in our groceries and stores be packaged and priced with sustainability in mind— or not packaged at all?
Wouldn’t my entire neighborhood’s electricity come from clean energy instead of it simply being an OPTION for each individual consumer?
Wouldn’t more people be living much closer to their workplaces or be taking public transportation so the roads would not be so clogged?
Wouldn’t social norms have emerged so fewer people would be traveling such long distances just to vacation, especially by airplane, which does so much atmospheric damage?
Wouldn’t it be much easier for a sustainably conscious person to figure out which restaurants (or grocery stores) actually create less food waste?
Wouldn’t take-out food places offer returnable food containers?
Wouldn’t there be fewer toxins and forever chemicals in our waterways, drinking water, food and bodies?
Wouldn’t we have banned noisy, atmospheric damaging leaf blowers if leaves are supposed to be left on the ground (as stated on page 108)?
Sustainability in agriculture and eating isn’t a new concept. For instance, in 1971 the book Diet for a Small Planet by Frances Moore Lappé was a BESTSELLER and it highlighted some of the environmental impacts of meat production and eating meat!
If sustainability were indeed simple, why aren’t more of us in the US (who do want to be good future ancestors) actually finding it anything but simple to live sustainably?
I found this thin volume at the library covered in a plastic-like protector.
I usually think of libraries as being a sustainable-friendly option since they share books (and toys and tools and the like), but mightn’t there be room for libraries to become more sustainable?
Instead of being a frequent flyer, I decided to be a frequent reader. Books offer a way to travel to far off places without spewing so many atmospheric damaging emissions. Libraries are part of this environmental armchair travel. But are they as sustainable as they could be? I don’t know.
However, while the authors in this reasonably helpful book do mention that we should look for paper with 100 percent recycled content or else look for an FSC label to ensure the paper came from a forest that’s managed responsibly, I wonder if our libraries —with their collective purchasing power —are demanding this from publishers. This particular book does have the FSC label, but it was the ONLY one in my rather tall stack of library books.
I also do sometimes buy new and used books. Some of those books have mentioned their sustainable paper and printing status. Of course, libraries have ebooks that seem more sustainable in that no paper is involved. An ebook option no doubt saves some readers from traveling to a library building by car or other vehicle that most likely burns fossil fuels.
As a rather frequent reader who has lived in a variety of places, I have intentionally looked for places to live where I could be a more sustainable book lover by walking to my local library. I do sometimes read ebooks on an iPad, but “my eyes and I” prefer to hold an actual book, especially if it’s a children’s picture book.
Currently, I do live where I can walk to two libraries and a bookstore. And nearby there are several free “little library” weatherproofed cupboard-type boxes (with a glass window) often set on posts —some I can reach by walking on trails through conservation woods that my reading nook overlooks. In these neighborhood book “exchanges,” anyone can donate or take a free book.
But back to libraries… Are they making the most of their collective power to encourage the publishing industry and our communities to be more sustainable?
Re this book: I notice that a pretty low number of Goodreads readers have read Sustainability Made Simple, even though it has been around for several years. One can hope that this is because there are many other similar sustainability books rather than that there is little interest in this topic, but who knows? Maybe a book like this just does not have enough reader appeal.
Still, I want to support authors and readers and others interested in sustainability and this educational endeavor. While much of this was familiar to me, I did appreciate that I might not be the target audience.