After reading many books on Buddhism I’ve come to believe that the most accurate and informative works are those from which you could delete all references to the word Buddha and the teachings would remain sound. And this is such a book. If you are looking for an introduction to Buddhism or just seeking to fill a void in your life (What’s the difference, right?), you won’t find any better.
A case in point: Thubten notes, “Most Westerners who come to my teachings are interested in the more meditative aspects of Buddhism.” And he clearly spends a lot of time hosting meditative retreats. At the same time, however, he does not fall into the trap of suggesting that meditation equals Buddhism.
He continues: “They seem to think they can transform their lives once they find the right methods.” This, I believe, is a result of the Western emphasis on the formal deduction of Aristotle and the resulting belief in the universality of cause and effect.
But everything in life is part of a duality. The other side of this preoccupation with method is the great strength of Western civilization because it is this worldview that is behind “The relentless curiosity and inquisitiveness that is the foundation of this modern culture [that] has helped me develop an intimate connection with a living and juicy Buddhism.”
Another duality: “It turned out that is all about becoming aware of your own limits and learning how to love. Quite simply, this is what Buddhism is all about.” And while the potential weakness of that definition is the ability to interpret Buddhism in some very superficial ways, that definition precludes misinterpretation. You literally can’t get it wrong and it is, therefore, I believe, the right one.
I think of Buddhism as the interconnection of everything in the universe over all of time, all in this instant, but the sentiment, I believe, is the same. Either way, there is no self. (The author can be quite humorous. In one passage he shares that after one retreat in Texas at which he explained the notion of anatta (no self), one helpful guess privately advised him, “Never again tell Americans there is no self.” I laughed out loud and that’s always a good thing.)
Personally, I seldom meditate. But I contemplate, often in isolation, 24/7. I agree with Thubten when he writes, “…to be spiritual is quite simple. It means someone spends lots of time taking care of his or her own mind. It is not about being holy.” Recognizing, of course, the “This fixed self is totally illusory. It only exists in your mind.” And, “The idea of karma is that we will never completely understand the mystery of our existence.” (A Taoist thought as well.)
My only hesitation came when he noted his growing acceptance of the integration of Buddhism and science. I don’t disagree with the idea but I do worry about our growing infatuation with science. I believe wholeheartedly in science, mind you, but science is a methodology, not a body of knowledge. And it is a methodology that requires the ability to isolate variables. And that, I believe, is its limitation. Not all variables in life or nature can be easily isolated. “You totally exist, but you are flowing energy. You are not a static entity that you can define, mold, categorize, or describe.”
My favorite quote is from a Tibetan master: “The bad news is that you have to jump out of the plane without a parachute. The good news is that there is no place to land.”
This is a very good book written with wit and clarity that is easy to understand and follow. One of the very best in the genre. I highly recommend it.