Uhh. So. I'm always on the lookout for books that seek to re-invent the horror genre, and was inspired to read this book after reading an article on LitHub on abstract horror.
Dennis Cooper's "Zac's Haunted House" is a novel consisting entirely of animated GIFs. It has no text whatsoever, apart from the odd captioned gif + chapter and novel titles. The GIFs themselves range from horror films to memes to porn to just non-descriptive graphic images, the latter often flashing or just generally harrowingly eye strain inducing. (As someone prone to headaches, I couldn't linger much on those but had to scroll forward fast. Also, don't read this book if you have photosensitive epilepsy. Also, it's obviously NSFW.) The GIFs aren't any of them wholly original, I think, but created/collected and put together into a collage/novel from various sources. (One was from Asdfmovie, I swear.) This is probably why the book is free to read online or download onto your computer.
I'm not entirely new to the idea of reading a text written out in pictures – for example, Ways of Seeing by John Berger had some picture essays, which I really liked – and I think it is a useful way of inviting the reader-viewer to construct their own idea of what's happening, as well as to interrogate their own way of engaging with various media. Zac's Haunted House is a very metafictive piece of work, in that it seems to scrutinise the relationship of the author as the creator and the reader as the recipient of images. At which point does the reader-viewer stop constructing images in their head based on the text, and starts to receive ready-made ones? How does that shift affect the way we infer and create meaning? Is there a meaning in the first place? The afterword is really sarcastic in this regard, and actually made me smile.
In this novel the image-based mode of storytelling also seems to work towards an intermedial end. I got the distinct impression that the structure and the sequence of the images mimics the usual dynamics of a haunted house-centered horror movie or book: images of decapitations, gore and other classic horror elements give the story its explicit horror padding, while the aforementioned graphic GIFs work in a more affective way to convey to the reader the sense of an uneasy something. These in turn are interspersed with scenes from a normal life: showers, amusement park rides, sex. That's the typical lull-action-lull-action-rinse-and-repeat sequence of most horror media.
For me personally, the book acted as a kind of sounding board to interrogate my relationship to literature and meaning-building, for which reason I appreciated it. But I can't quite say I actually *liked* it, mostly because of my own personal sensibilities. Furthermore, had it been a completely original project, instead of a collage of pre-existing material (albeit a cleverly constructed one), it would have probably warranted a higher star rating. The way it is, it kind of reminds me of one of those ~edgy~ Tumblr blogs. Definitely not a bad piece, though. Developed further, this mode of storytelling could offer something entirely new.