Informative, but still an incomplete work, therefore a thorough revision/ editing needed
The book starts with a very good entr'/ intr'o-duct'ion.
I mean the Intro does have a good point, but the author better rewrite it anyway due to the poor Engl'ish that disappoints the serious readers.
Informative lines continue throughout pages in the body part'/ port'ion of the book.
The whole Body is definitely en-/ in-form'at-ive and well-pre-sented.
I read the old 2016-Kindle Edition, so the book might have been revised and edited by now, but if not, this is my mid’/ mess’age to the author that the sentences are pretty rough, and so they need to be refined.
Here’s some errors I’ve found and corrected for readers’ sake.
(Kindle Ed., p. 1)
...they did not see the current political situation as worthy of risking their lives, especially since a Home Rule Act—which would allow Ireland to largely govern itself while remaining part of the United Kingdom—was passed and only waiting for the end of World War I to be enacted.
Correction: ...they did not see the current political situation as worthy of risking their lives, especially since the Home Rule Act was passed that would allow Ireland, while remaining part of the United Kingdom, to largely govern itself. As a matter of fact they were just waiting for the World War to be over like the rest of the world.
(Ibid., p. 2)
In terms of casualties, immediate impact, or regime change, the Easter Rising was not drastic, but its eventual effect is immeasurable...
Correction: ...In terms of casualties or immediate impact, the Easter Rising was not as drastic as history’s "successful" risings or revolutions known to us, but its eventual effect was immeasurable...
(Ibid., p. 2)
...Without the Easter Rising, it is not outside the realm of possibility to say that Ireland as we know it today might not exist.
Correction: ...It is true that without the Easter Rising, "Ireland we know today" might not exist.
(Ibid., p. 4)
...and is well recognized as a source of great strife on the island; that it was a factor contributing to the Easter Rebellion should come as no surprise.
Correction: ...and is well recognized as a source of great strife on the island; it was, indeed, one of the factors contributing to the Easter Rebellion as well.
(Ibid., p. 8)
...These plots were almost always less that fifteen acres...
Correction: ...These plots were almost always less "than" fifteen acres...
(Ibid., p. 14)
It is also important to remember that while we can look back at the timing of the Easter Rising and note that it fell right in the middle of World War I, those who participated could not have known that. World War I was unlike any war that Europe or the world had seen in the past...
Correction: It is also important to remember that those who participated in WWI could not have known the Easter Rising as we can look back at the timing of the event and note that it fell right in the middle of the great war...
(Ibid., p. 14)
...By 1916, it had already inflicted unprecedented death and destruction. From the perspective of all involved, including the Irish, it also showed no signs of abetting. Most battles ended in stalemates, and armies were fighting in trenches in order to gain very small advances. What was more, the U.S. did not appear likely to intervene: In 1916, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected on a promise to keep America out of the war. From the perspective of those at the time, it probably looked like the war was never-ending...
Does the writer realize that the event happened in 1916? What, the United States of America at the time was already like she is today, the world's no. 1 superpower, and the world was expecting to see an end to the war with her intervention?
(Ibid., p. 22)
...Then, destroy the fort, a formidable symbol of British power in and control over Ireland...
Correction: ...Then, destroy the fort, a formidable symbol of British power and control over Ireland...
(Ibid., p. 26)
Because the British controlled Ireland, presumably, they had an interest in maintaining and preserving infrastructure, despite the high amount of destruction it experienced over the course of the week...
Correction: Nonetheless, the uprising caused serious destruction to many of important infrastructures the British had controlled and, of course, the British didn't want to see further damage to them...
(Ibid., p. 32)
Just as elsewhere in Ireland, the British response—whether from troops or members of the RIC—was harsh. This helped spread anti-British sentiment throughout the country, not just in Dublin...
How many readers the author believed would bother looking up to find out that RIC stood for the Royal Irish Constabulary? What, was this book only written for the experts of Irish history, not for any beginners to the subject?
(Ibid., p. 35)
As people swapped stories and more information was printed in newspapers, it became clear that the British were primarily responsible for this suffering. It was the British who used shells and heavy artillery, and they who used machine guns and armoured vehicles...
Correction: ...and they used machine guns and armoured vehicles...
Lastly, what is this weird, short and “pathetic” two-paragraph conclusion?
The author drew a wrong line between the Body and Conclusion; the book's con-clos'/ clus'ion clearly started in one of the last pages of the Body much earlier than this point.
Nothing to add or deduct, but just move the line, and it will be a gre’at conclusion as it is.
The book’s quality as a complete pr’o-duct is below stand’ard. Nonetheless, it is super informative with many good and fresh points. Once the book’s thoroughly revised and edited, it will be a great addition to the world of hi-stor’y archive.