This is a sweeping tour of the choices and life-paths of women under the German Occupation of Paris during World 2. Some are the few heroines we recognize from books and film who helped hide Jews or joined a Resistance network. Others are emblematic courtesans, entertainers, and war profiteers who forged self-serving connections with the new masters, including ones who spied and informed on Resistance activities, facilitated the roundup of Jews for internment, or reaped profits from the appropriation of their businesses, homes, and treasures. Between these poles were the vast majority of Parisian women who took a wait-and-see attitude, just trying to get along and find enough income for food and shelter. So many figures and their stories that they tend to blur together, but the collective does provide a fascinating journalistic portrait of a city under duress and themes of resilience and diverging modes of adaptation to the Occupation in its successive phases, well illustrated, indexed, and footnoted. Just don’t expect a penetrating historical analysis of causes and effects For me it was an excellent companion read to Sebastian Faulks’ recent novel “Paris Echo”, whose lead character pursues the history of women in Paris during the German Occupation. Like that book, with its highlighting of a woman who betrays a Resistance leader and his network out of personal jealousy, Seba’s collage helped me take a less judgmental attitude of those who ended up engaging in varying degrees of collaboration.
The Occupation evokes so many collective emotional reactions, here made real with details from so many stories. Such a pity when that gibbering madman Hitler got control of the jewel of Western Civilization a few short weeks after his armies breached the Maginot Line. Such a shame to see conquering brigades goose-stepping up the Champs de Elysee. Such travail in the mass freakout when many thousands fled in chaos to the countryside, and out of the country if possible. Dark days indeed to see iconic buildings taken for headquarters by their new German masters and bedecked with swastikas.
But they were all oh so well-behaved at first. The city was not bombed. Hitler wanted its culture and factories to flourish, though for the benefit of the Third Reich’s image and economy at war. Many residents who initially fled returned to join the larger group of less well-off classes with no means to run. The majority were women, children, and the elderly because a half million young men were now POWs and thousands other men were already dead or headed to join de Gaulle’s nation in exile. Life went on with the new German customers of shops, hotels, night clubs, and brothels. The German officers were eager to experience elegant dining, dance and opera performances, and shop for jewelry, clothing, lingerie, and other quality goods not available in Germany. The tamed and appropriated city was a favorite of all sites in conquered lands for Axis soldiers to take their leave, and the city’s 200 brothels had no trouble keeping their businesses busy.
As long as one could tolerate the laying off of most Jews in the diverse businesses, accommodation was acceptable by the majority and the law of the land under the puppet Vichy government. The women with the most anti-fascist rebellion in their hearts, those with communist leanings, were undercut by the German-Russian pact of 1940. But when the Vichy government went out of their way to pass anti-semitic laws and turn a blind eye to factories being manned with the slave labor of political prisoners and POWs, more recruits to Resistance activity were made. Just seeing fashion queens like Coco Chanel, actresses like Corrine Lachaire, and diverse aristocrat courtesans hobnobbing in luxurious splendor with German officers at the Folies Bergere, the Comedie-Francaise, the opera, and fancy restaurants was enough to turn the heart of many of lesser means at a hungry time. Sleeping with the enemy was one step, but doing so with such special benefits was a big affront, though still not enough to sway many toward revolt. Besides, the eventual policy of the Nazis to kill 100 French for every German killed by the Resistance was quite a deterrent.
Signs of the stages toward the Final Solution were evident to some, but many could ignore them. On their own initiative and not ordered by Hitler, the Vichy authorities pursued the appropriation of the homes and businesses of many Jews. In collaboration with the Nazis, the goods and real estate of about 20,000 homes in Paris were seized and divvied out for profit. In July 1942 about 13,000 Jews were rounded up and held in filth and starvation at a bicycle racing stadium, the Velodrome d”Hiver, there to be sent to terrible detention facilities around Paris before eventual shipment to extermination camps like Auschwitz (only 800 returned; the total killed over the course of the war was around 65,000). Many people believed the story that this was just a deportation of foreign Jews. But subsequent sweeps took more and more prominent Jewish citizens thought to be immune due to their prominent roles in the economy (like the centuries-old banking clan of the Rothschilds). These actions, combined with progress of the Allies in defeating the Germans, moved more and more people to Resistance activities.
Despite never having had the vote or even legally allowed to have a banking account, growing numbers contributed in small or moderate ways to helping Jews escape or hide or providing information or material support to aid those active in the Resistance. I like the example of brothel madams who hid subversives or Jews in their establishments. And the case of Edith Piaf, who drew complaints for aiding the Nazi propaganda efforts with performances at detention centers, but who used the group photos with the prisoners to create fake identity papers for many of them. I particularly loved the actions of an art archiver who was subverted by the Nazis to help with all the cataloging and distribution of stolen art treasures (Goering himself was long on the trough of that bonanza), but all the while she was keeping a secret record of the origin and disposition of each piece, and after the war used her records to good effect in recovering a lot of the art. I was also impressed with the heroism of Jenny Rousseau, a prisoner who one day refused to continue with forced labor in a munitions plant as against the Geneva Convention. The toughness of a such a choice at risk of one’s own life was revealed when we learn that the action spurred broad and brutal retribution against a whole pool of factory laborers. A similar tragic consequence applied to the work of the organization UGIF (Union Generale des Israelites de France) , which worked diligently to support the feeding and housing of orphans and refugees, but had their records of locations of Jews used for roundups by the Nazis.
Among the set of women who were most active in the Resistance, we are led to appreciate the critical role of the British Special Operations Executive and its notable female agents who worked in secret to recruit and organize sympathetic French into subverting Nazi goals and to recover and extract downed airmen. Because use of women in active warfare violated the Geneva Convention, their role was kept secret by the Brits for a long time after the war. A special heroine for me is SOE controller Vera Atkins whose loyalty to her agents knew no bounds. Toward the end of the war, a blown network led to the capture of about 10 of her female operatives, and after the war’s end she worked ceaselessly to learn of their fates. She ended up interviewing many survivors and employees of various concentration camps. She pieced together how four of her former agents were shipped to a small concentration camp, drugged, and thrown alive into a furnace. She gathered that her star ageny, Vera Leigh, woke up and fought hard at the last and severely scratched the guard killing her. From witness statements and scars on the face of the guard, she was able to cinch the war crimes prosecution and execution of its commandant, a doctor, and one of the guards. Although execution of spies was not banned in the Geneva Accord, killing people without a trial did constitute a war crime.
Aside from a few show trials, few collaborators were really punished after the war. Most of these were convicted under a new law which stripped their citizenship rights and eligibility for government jobs for a period of time. De Gaulle judged that the country needed to concentrate on recovery and did not pursue close investigations. Also, it was hard to judge people criminally for aiding the Nazis when collaboration was the national policy of the Vichy government. But throughout every community, the French made their own retributions against the women seen as guilty of “collaboration horizontale”. An estimated 20,000 women were subject to public head shaving, beatings, and other humiliation. Another estimate has it that by mid-1943, there were about 80,000 official claims for support from French women for children fathered by Germans in the occupation. The author urges readers to consider how many of these liaisons were rape or under duress, how many were from natural human attraction and affection, and how all pale in comparison to collaboration that truly aided and abetted Nazi horrors or served unwarranted profiteering at the expense of others.
Overall, this was a worthwhile read to cover the spectrum of heroism, perfidy, and just getting by among the population of Parisian women trapped by the Occupation. The presentation was engaging and the marshalling of tons of research sources on so many themes quite amazing. Unfortunately, as its writing was 70 years after the end of the war, very few new interviews of survivors could contribute to the effort.