On March 18, 1990, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston was robbed of an estimated $500 million in paintings, including two world-famous masterpieces, Rembrandt’s Storm on the Sea of Galilee and Vermeer’s The Concert. The still-unsolved robbery is the biggest art theft in world history and is a subject of frequent speculation among art, crime, and mystery buffs. Among these buffs is Tom Kenny, who presents an interesting theory on the fate of the paintings in his novel, The Docent by Tom Kenny, an intriguing but flawed legal thriller.
The Docent takes place around 2003 and concerns a fictional but equally high value theft, the plundering of a family business trust fund by an avaricious uncle. The relatives who were bilked file suit, and, under the laws of fraud in Massachusetts, the uncle could stand to lose up to a billion dollars in damages. Not surprisingly, the uncle isn’t too concerned with legalities and hires lawyers willing to do whatever it takes to win the case. That task is made considerably more difficult because the presiding judge on the case, Zelia Valdes, makes one ruling after another in favor of the defrauded relatives. The uncle’s attorneys start investigating Judge Valdes, who is new to the bench, and eventually discover a connection between her and the stolen paintings.
The Docent is a complex story with a large number of characters, and it takes the author a while to tie all his storylines together. For example, after a brief prologue, the stolen paintings aren’t mentioned again until nearly halfway through the book, and it’s several chapters later before their significance in the story becomes apparent. However, after a bit of a slow start, Kenny makes most of the story interesting. He is a practicing attorney from the Boston area, and his discussion of procedure and the ins and outs of the local court system seem authentic. But he let me down somewhat in his discussion of the centerpiece trial. We are told repeatedly that the judge makes numerous rulings in favor of the defrauded relatives but given no examples. Since the villains in the book repeatedly claim that the judge is biased while her supporters say her rulings are fair, some context from the author by way of scenes from the trial would have given readers a better idea of the truth and made for some entertaining reading as well.
Further, the author’s cast of characters are sketched in overly simplistic terms. There are a handful of villains, to be sure, but the remaining characters could be described as “gosh darned nice.” The titular docent (a museum guide) was involved in the robbery but he is just a gosh darned nice guy, and a hooker who provides some key information to the authorities to get off the hook on some criminal charges is also gosh darn nice. The judge’s law clerk seems to have stepped straight off the set of some 50’s TV drama about a hard working Italian family. The level of saccharine in author Kenny’s descriptions gets way too thick at times. Further, it makes him resort to some highly implausible machinations to work towards the requisite happy endings.
One more thing I would point out about The Docent. At times, the book seems almost like a commercial for the tobacco industry, as a number of characters take the time to smoke an inordinate number of cigarettes, none of which is really necessary in terms of plot or character development. If this is the author’s attempt to describe character, it’s annoying more than anything else (especially since those who smoke are the more likable characters in the book).
Despite the character flaws and what I felt was an overly contrived ending, I did like The Docent. The author channels John Grisham somewhat in his examining a complex case from behind the scenes, as the nefarious characters try to subvert the legal system. In so doing, they hatch up a scheme straight out of a Mission Impossible TV episode. It’s far-fetched but still enjoyable to read about. Unfortunately, as the book reaches its conclusion, the plot manipulation catches up with the author and the ending doesn’t pack the punch it should. Still, for those who like this type of legal thriller, The Docent makes its case well enough to get the jury’s verdict.