At a time when policy discussions are dominated by “I feel” instead of “I know,” it is more important than ever for social scientists to make themselves heard. When those who possess in-depth training and expertise are excluded from public debates about pressing social issues—such as climate change, the prison system, or healthcare—vested interests can sway public opinion in uninformed ways. Yet few graduate students, researchers, or faculty know how to do this kind of work—or feel empowered to do it.
While there has been an increasing call for social scientists to engage more broadly with the public, concrete advice for starting the conversation has been in short supply. Arlene Stein and Jessie Daniels seek to change this with Going Public , the first guide that truly explains how to be a public scholar. They offer guidance on writing beyond the academy, including how to get started with op-eds and articles and later how to write books that appeal to general audiences. They then turn to the digital realm with strategies for successfully building an online presence, cultivating an audience, and navigating the unique challenges of digital world. They also address some of the challenges facing those who go public, including the pervasive view that anything less than scholarly writing isn’t serious and the stigma that one’s work might be dubbed “journalistic.”
Going Public shows that by connecting with experts, policymakers, journalists, and laypeople, social scientists can actually make their own work stronger. And by learning to effectively add their voices to the conversation, researchers can help make sure that their knowledge is truly heard above the digital din.
This is exactly what it says it is: an excellent orientation to writing publicly, aimed at academics, especially those in the social sciences. It's accessible, reassuring, and inspirational. There's a lot of writing advice around, and this book references a good deal of it without repeating it. It does a great job of assisting readers who have something to say but don't quite know how to get started saying it. As a non-academic, the chapter on metrics, which talked about framing public writing as part of one's case for tenure, wasn't relevant to me, but most of the rest of it was.
This is a succinct and clear guide that reviews the reasons why it is important for academics to communicate to general publics, the various ways and venues they might go about doing so, and some strategies for success in a variety of venues. I especially enjoyed their close readings of several examples of public academia (op-eds, popular books, etc.). I also appreciated several of the resources they provided (most notably different blogs and aggregators for academic work).
Although I was familiar with much of the technologies and resources provided, there was lots of new information and good food for thought. As a social scientist I can see more how I can further my influence outside of the academy.