As a collection of different pieces of Abbey's work, my four star rating of this one is an average: parts of this book get 3 stars, and parts get 5.
As others have written in reviews before me, at times Abbey's politics get a bit overwhelming. The collection at the end moves out of narrative and descriptive writing and become intensely persuasive in nature...at times, it seems to descend into a rant (and the version I have mixed up two essays' pages at the end, which was very confusing).
I must admit, I found the final essays enigmatic: Abbey is a naturalist to be sure, and he looks down upon anyone who does not share his passion for being out in the wild, but at the same time, he doesn't WANT anyone else there. He wants everyone to know how wonderful the wild world is, but it should remain solely for him (keep all those darn tourists out), while he casts judgment from afar on immigrants, Native Americans, city-dwellers, the disabled, and pretty much everyone who is not him.
Now...that said, there were places I found fascinating: as a resident of New Mexico who has spent some time in Canyonlands NP and Arches NP and passed through Moab a number of times, I reveled in the descriptions of that world, like the description of the first time he saw Albuquerque, my own home town: "In the evening we came to a town of 35,000 souls that lay in a shallow valley in the desert between volcanoes on the west and--on the east--a mountain range pink as the heart of a watermelon. Albuquerque. Through the middle of this small dusty city ran a wide but shallow river the color of mud, shining like polished brass under the cloud reflected light of sunset." That's the city (bigger now) that I see before me every day.
And there was a part of me that enjoyed the philosophical musings of the writer: "...it seems to me that the world is not nearly big enough and that any portion of its surface, left unpaved and alive, is infinitely rich in details and relationships, in wonder, beauty, mystery, comprehensible only in part. The very existence of existence is itself suggestive of the unknown--not a problem, but a mystery." Or later in the text, when he is readying to leave Alaska, " The planet is bigger than we ever imagined. The world is colder, more ancient, more strange and more mysterious than we had dreamed... No equation however organic, no prose however royally purple, can bracket our wold within the boundaries of mind." Wow. Well done.
And truly, there are few writers who can capture the beauty of the natural world in words and metaphorically tying it to life so well as Edward Abbey. For example, in describing Indian Paintbrush (a desert plant that grows profusely in the foothills where I live), he manages to capture the wonder of its blooming cycle in a way that teaches us about being human: "its cup of salmon-colored, petallike bracts toward the sky. [It] too is beautiful, with the special and extraordinary beauty of wild and lonely things. Every desert flower shares that quality. Anything that lives where it would seem that nothing could live, enduring extremes of heat and cold, sunlight and storm, parching aridity and sudden cloudbursts, among burnt rock and shifting sands, any such creature...testifies to the grandeur and heroism inherent in all forms of life. Including the human. Even us."
I feel I know Abbey, the person, much better at the end of the book. I'm not sure we would've gotten along very well, despite our common affection for the wild world. He seems to have a pigeon-hole where women fit (bordering on misogyny at some points) and sometimes just seems like a misanthrope. I get the feeling from his writing that he was a narcissist--he considered himself a human above all the other humans. It's easy to portray Eskimos in a negative light in a bar... much more complex to delve into the depths of how systems and history have led them there. And even easier to advocate for just burning the government down than to try to realistically solve the problems. Generally, I didn't care much for his fictional work--I wish the editor would've included more from "Desert Solitaire" and less from his novels--but would that have given me the true picture of Abbey as a whole? Probably not. I should just re-read "Desert Solitaire".
And so, back to where I started. Some of the book was delightful and I reveled in reading it and letting the pictures unfold in my mind; some of it I found just too much a trip into the mind of a person who I'm not sure I wholly admire.