What do you think?
Rate this book


400 pages, Paperback
First published October 12, 2016

“Always in our Neverland.”
“It was only for a second, a mere moment, but I swear, in that time, though it seemed still, a thousand sunsets could have come and go.”
“’Never say goodbye because goodbye means going away and going away means forgetting.’”

"I'm scared to look away, because you might not be there when I look back."
3.5 stars.
Trust me, I'm quite sad due to the fact that I am unable to award this book five stars. I wish that I loved it- I really do. Not to say that I disliked it; I enjoyed this book, but it just was not what I thought that it'd be.
I bought this book because, for some reason, I have an odd fascination with the story behind Peter Pan and just J.M. Barrie's life in general. It's to be expected that I stumbled upon Michael Llewelyn Davies, then Rupert Buxton, and subsequently the two boy's relationship. I've spent countless hours reading about them and their families. I cannot really tell you why I'm so interested in their stories... I'm a huge history buff, and I suppose I just am unable to resist a good, true story. I, along with most people, firmly believe that the real Michael and Rupert were lovers. There is a play written about them in which I must read, but other than that Rupert is scarcely mentioned in media. Therefore, when I discovered this book, I was elated. Finally, their love story told! I expected it to be haunting, especially considering that Rupert is tethered to the spirit world whilst Michael is not. Instead I got... I'm not sure.
The writing in this book is what bothers me most, I think. To begin, it is incredibly mediocre. There were a few lines of dialogue between Rupert and the love interest Aaron that got to me, but other than that this book is just not quotable. This disappoints me, because one of my favorite things about reading is discovering beautiful prose. Furthermore, the author uses way too many parenthesis- even when characters are speaking! This is one of my pet peeves. It is definitely okay to include some parenthesis every once in a while (read: every 150 pages- at least in my opinion), but the amount in which the author utilized them was just excessive, and I found myself growing increasingly annoyed. I also saw over three typos, which really took me out of the reading experience.
Oh, and take a shot every time Rupert says, "I tell you". Or maybe don't, as you'd most likely become black-out drunk.
Obviously, I am a fan of Michael and Rupert's story (it kind of irks me that their death dates were changed, but I suppose I can understand, as the author wished for them to be teenagers). We get to see some of their time together via flashbacks in this novel. I found their moments to be very cute, however, they were plagued with what many readers would call "insta-love". I get that they're soulmates or whatever, but come on...Kissing within the first hour they've known each other? In the early 1900s? I think not.
I did also enjoy Rupert/Aaron, and think they're extremely cute. However, , I still think their love was pretty instantaneous as well. I'll cut Rupert a break, as I get where his love is coming from, but Aaron? He moves really quickly, I suppose.
Now, while this book is mostly a romance, it also hinges on the mystery surrounding Rupert's death. There are two 'big' plot-twists.
I guessed both of them right off the bat. The first one I even jotted down before I started reading. The second I came up with within the first 100 pages. To get to the point: the author is not subtle. Everything essentially dances around right in front of your eyes, but the main characters are too dumb to figure it out simply because if they were smart, the book would not be half as long.
This review is fairly negative, but I swear I don't hate this book. I love how it's from the ghost's POV versus the human's, and I love the whole tragic aspect to Rupert and Michael's romance. I just wish that it had been executed a bit differently. The story was cute, sometimes funny, sometimes sad, but never breathtaking. Jonathan Ferrara did a fine job, and quite obviously was very passionate about this book. However; I believe that, if written by a different author, this book could truly be a mind-blowing masterpiece.Michael Llewelyn Davies (16 June 1900 – 19 May 1921)
Rupert Erroll Victor Buxton (May 10, 1900 – May 19, 1921)