Maybe I am truly being just a bit (and perhaps even much more than a bit) too curmudgeonly here, but honestly, why should Andrea Beaty point out in her Ada Twist, Scientist that young Ada asks questions (and attempts scientific experiments) not simply because she is intelligent, not because she is curious and desires to find out the required information and knowledge she lacks and wants to know, but seemingly only and solely because she is somehow and supposedly meant to be a scientist?
For yes indeed, it is obviously and in reality NOT just children who as toddlers, who at a young age pepper their parents with question after question about their surroundings, about their world (and who try to discover things about their world through testing boundaries, through experimentation and imagination), who will grow up to be scientists. And for Andrea Beaty in the presented verses of Ada Twist, Scientist to repeatedly point out that, well, only scientifically inclined youngsters would actually and in fact be asking questions (would somehow be intelligent and curious enough to be posing the necessary queries and get actively enough involved in their world), that is in my humble opinion both insulting and totally majorly denigrating to and for those of us who are NOT scientists, who have other but yes indeed equally important and necessary interests (and of course careers).
And most certainly, as someone with a PhD in German literature, who indeed also asked her parents very many intelligent and curious questions as a toddler, I actually have found Ada Twist, Scientist rather majorly problematic at best and indeed quite disgustingly with a tendency to be massively offensive to and for children who might not be all that interested in the sciences, whose interests and likes perhaps do happen to lie like mine did (and do) in the humanities, in the social sciences, in the arts etc.
Because even though the author has likely not in any manner intended for this, in Ada Twist, Scientists, it sure does (personally) feel as though Andrea Beaty somehow wants to single out the sciences as somehow being more special and more important. And as such, even though Ada Twist, Scientist is definitely textually fun and encouraging and that David Roberts' accompanying artwork does indeed present a visually engaging aesthetic mirror to and for Andrea Beaty's printed and featured words, I for one have truly and really found Ada Twist, Scientist at best uncomfortable on a personal level, and yes indeed, I also do consider Ada Twist, Scientist (and by extension author Andrea Beaty) as rather obviously and deliberately putting some careers and interests on a pedestal and above certain others, being judgmental towards children whose interests and strengths might not be all that science and math oriented.
Thus and as someone with a career in the humanities, I definitely will call this out as being rather if not even majorly inappropriate, and especially so in a picture book geared towards young children (not to mention that the lax acceptance of Ada's parents with regard to their daughter's occasional but heavy destructiveness as she is trying to do her experiments and the like is also rather troubling, as while it is of course important for parents to encourage their children's creativity and thirst for knowledge, the free-for-all portrayed by Andrea Beaty as being so inherently positive in Ada Twist, Scientist definitely makes me personally cringe and consider Ada's parents as just a wee bit too permissive).