What do you think?
Rate this book


416 pages, ebook
First published January 1, 2017
Although I know of no hypothesis that adequately covers the mountainous evidence,” [he] said in closing, “this should not and must not deter us from following the advice of Schroedinger: to be curious, capable of being astonished, and eager to find out.”Quiz time. Ok, what is a close encounter of the first kind? Second kind? Third? You might be forgiven for not knowing with much precision the answers to the first two, but I bet you can answer number three. You probably think you have Stephen Spielberg to thank for that particular item. Well, I guess you do. But neither Spielberg nor his writers came up with that structure for describing the levels of possible UFO encounters. In fact, Spielberg was all set to steal the intel until the guy who actually came up with it, hearing about the film project, sent the director a polite letter pointing out the ripoff, one of many. Spielberg had borrowed liberally from the man’s reports on sightings, as laid out in his 1972 book The UFO Experience: A scientific enquiry. The scientist in question was one Josef Allen Hynek. Spielberg brought him in and paid him a pittance to be a “consultant” on the film. Hynek even got a cameo, six whole seconds. If you have never heard of him before, welcome to the club.

In a television news interview that aired in 1958, Hynek urged the construction of a “National Space Observatory”…claiming that a space based observatory would “pay great and immediate dividends” in new scientific knowledge… “From a space observatory we could see the surface of planets with unimaginable clarity even with a small telescope,” Hynek said. In addition to revolutionizing astronomical observing, Hynek’s proposed telescope could also be trained on Earth itself, making real-time weather data “continuously available to weather forecasters over the world” and leading to “greater knowledge of basic weather causes that would result in more reliable long-range forecasts.”Then there was his other career. Actually, the two converged. Interest in UFOs increased in the late 1940s and early 1950s, as there were more and more eyes on the skies, and equipment with which to record sightings was more widely available. Who hasn’t heard of Roswell? But you may not have heard of Kenneth Arnold, who, on June 24, 1947, while flying his plane across the Cascades to Yakima, WA, spotted nine objects in the sky, that he judged flew at about 1200 miles per hour. He called this ahead to the Yakima field and was dismissed by the personnel there. But when he continued on to Pendleton, OR, he was interviewed by reporters. One took his description of the craft he had seen and added a bit of flourish. Thus was born the term “flying saucers.”
Hynek was, of course, describing the Hubble Space Telescope a mere thirty–two years before its launch, while throwing in a little preview of TIROS-1, the first successful weather satellite, to be launched two years hence, in 1960.




I didn’t set out to prove anything one way or another, and so I never had to worry about painting myself into a logical corner, or closing my book with a disappointing let-down. I think that, by recounting the history of UFOs through the eyes of Dr. Hynek, who was literally on the scene within hours or days of many of the most spectacular UFO incidents on record, and mirroring Hynek’s open-minded approach to these incidents, I give the reader a new way to experience the UFO phenomenon without feeling silly about it. I try not to persuade the reader one way or another, but to present the facts of the cases, Joe Friday-style, as they were reported by the witnesses, by the Air Force, and by Dr. Hynek, and let the reader draw his or her own conclusions.He does a solid job of detailing Hynek’s life in science, his entry into studying the UFO phenomenon, and his role in the ongoing research. Hynek’s personal life is given cursory consideration.

“I divide the close encounter cases into three subdivisions: the close encounter, with little detail; the close encounter with physical effects: and the close encounter in which ‘humanoids’ or occupants are reported,” he told the group. Although the “physical effects” variant was the most appealing to him, he acknowledged that the “humanoid” encounters possessed their own uniquely repellant appeal. “This latter subgroup, of course, has the highest strangeness index and frightens away all but the most hardy investigators. I would be neither a good reporter nor a good scientist were I to deliberately reject data. /there are now on record some 1,500 reports of close encounters, about half of which involve reported craft occupants. Reports of occupants have been with is for years but there are only a few in the Air Force files; generally Project Bluebook personnel summarily, and without investigation, consigned such reports to the ‘psychological’ or crackpot category.Link to the full 1951 film, The Thing From Another World