This book offers a legitimate understanding of the dynamical linkages that exist between the various levels of emergent causality in humans. For instance:
“I saw a definite similarity between the endurance athletes and people who succumb to drug addiction or suffer from post-traumatic stress-disorder. Drug addicts who overdose die after falling into a coma – not while high but while in a crash after the high. Post-traumatic stress disorder, as the name clearly underscores, doesn’t kick in during the stress that is experienced, but afterward. Sometimes people cannot recover from the recovery that naturally follows their upswings. They cannot pick back up again. From this perspective, the key was that whatever the cause of Jack Kelly’s death, it somehow involved the overall process of exercise followed by recovery.” – Irv Dardik, The Nature of Nature: The Discovery of Superwaves and how it Changes Everything; pg. 153, Rodale, 2017
As a person who is very well read in the literature on developmental or complex post-traumatic stress disorder, I found Dardik's explanation of the dynamical continuity between the physiological recovery related to intense muscular exertion (exercise) and the affective recovery related to a stressful emotional experience (Dardik uses meditation as his term) to be remarkably insightful - and on that account alone Dardik's book deserves to be recognized as offering an important piece to the puzzle (hehehe) of how human's self-organize.
That said, Dardik, trained as a physiologist, does not seem to realize that there is an unconscious affective regulation process that intermediates between the conscious regulation of affect (meditation) and the more basic physiological recovery processes related to muscular exertion. Nevertheless, it is very satisfying to know what sort of dynamical continuity exists between the body, the affective body, and the conscious mind, in that all these dynamics express the same fluctuations and exhibit the same problems when the system is pushed beyond its energetic threshold: in the case of running without being properly trained for recovery (or parasympathetic control on the heart) ones heart can literally stop. Similarly, if one is exposed to a dysregulating affective stimulus - a loud environment, yelling voices, mean or dissociative faces - the affective body will be forced to dissociate the content related to the stimulus (as mild trauma) or if the stimulus is long enough, to dissociate its own conscious mind from it's body, creating the tell-tale signs of PTSD.
That said, it really feels like Dardik doesn't properly understand modern physics, as the idea that 'particles' exist - or that physical objects exist - is sort of relevant to the way matter organizes itself. Particles/Objects matter, ergo, physics has related to it as such
It is truly only because I enjoyed that example from Dardik that my rating is not 1 - which is to say, Dardik's sheer philosophical ignorance of why particle/wave, or for that matter, a dualistic monism is taken, has everything to do with how matter works. Dardik's philosophizing is truly of the lowest order - nevermind his apparent unawareness of what drives physicists to posit dark matter or antimatter, and how numbers/ideas relate to actuated realities/objects. Particle/wave duality falls within the schema of things; it is not necessitated by observation alone, but by semiotic and geometrical realities that matter.
How I finished Dardk,'s book without ripping my hair out is a mystery. I started off with what I found to be interesting - continuity between physiological (exertion/rest) and social (arousal/rest) dynamics in the body; and indeed, these sorts of linkages are important. But Dardik attempts to bite off too great a piece by attempting to attack all of modern physics - and to boot, he must have experienced his arguments as sufficient, either demonstrating an ignorance of the facts (of what makes most people regard modern physics as coherent and the most plausible explanation we have of how matter works) or an intellectual and existential dullness that most educated people will be immediately turned off from.