An intricate, tensile-structure of a book.
Susan Faludi has written (some of?) the best long-form journalism of the last quarter century. This is her fourth book, and the most personal. Shortly after the turn of the 21st century she reconnected with her long-estranged father, a Hungarian emigre' and holocaust-survivor who had returned to Hungary after the Fall of the Berlin Wall and was undergoing sex reassignment surgery.
Over the course of the 400+ pages of this book, Faludi flips back and forth through her father's life, eventually considering his boyhood as a Hungarian Jew, her impossibly ballsy acts during World War II, surviving his own divorced parents, his similarly bravado escape from communist East Europe to Brazil, and move to America, where he married and had a family. Steven Faludi--an assumed name--was a mountaineer, linguist of accomplishment, and, most importantly, photographer, intrigued by physical appearances and their manipulation.
He was also an enigma to his daughter. Quiet about so much that mattered to her, given to lectures, inscrutably annoying, and, ultimately, violent--leading to a divorce and estrangement in the 1970s. And he continued to be a puzzle, his sex change taking her off guard, and confusing her, in some ways, to the very end of his life and this book.
Interleaved with this personal story is a history of Hungary, especially in relations to its Jewish population. As anyone familiar with holocaust literature knows, Hungary was especially fervent to destroy the Jews who lived within its borders--Jews who had once lived a relatively assimilated life, but were then blamed for the country's dismemberment after the Great War. She continues the story to the near-present, with the return of a reactionary, anti-Semitic right in control of the nation's politics--a movement that Stefanie Faludi, as she renamed herself, was quite comfortable with, as he had never been very comfortable with his own Judaism. (In Faludi's account, this uneasiness was shared by the nation's co-religionists.)
The story is intricately structured, eschewing a chronological account for something more subtle: neither following Steven-Stefanie's life, nor the course of Susan's investigation, but dipping back here and there. The organizing principles are those tensile structures--a series of opposites. At the heart are questions of identity: is identity something we embrace, create, escape--or is something we cannot resist? What does transsexuality mean for binary gender roles--does it break them down or reinforce them? Is Judaism something one can resist, or something that is attributed? Are nations bundles of peoples and land--or collections of myths?
The set of oppositions cuts close to home. In looking at her father, Faludi necessarily has to examine her own family and life--but she is clearly more comfortable on the other side of the tape recorder, asking the questions, not revealing, and it is clear that she is pulling back here, keeping from revealing too much.
Ultimately arranging these opposing forces into a möbius strip serves Faludi well. She builds to a climax, but that movement is hard to detect, and it is never quite clear *how* she made the peace with her father, as opposed to recognizing that she did.
But perhaps that's a deficiency of my reading. I preferred the alternating narrative form here because I found her father's persona very unpleasant. For all that Faludi unveiled some of the props to that persona, and some of the reasons he hewed so closely to it, he still came across as a self-centered jerk, until the very end. (It seems that Faludi just stopped reporting on his more unpleasant behaviors, rather than them stopping.) Still, he went through a great deal of transformations--he was on hormones!, he dressed as a woman!, he traveled to Thailand and paid thousands of dollars to undergo irreversible sex reassignment surgery! But he could barely manage to reach out to his daughter, barely manage to see beyond his own needs.
Oddly, then, even flashes to some of Europe's worst historical moments came as something of a relief. It broke from the closeness of a single asshole and took in a larger view . . . of assholes, yes, but at least there was some room to breathe.
But however one sees the father at the heart of this narrative, the organization and details remain exciting. The narrative stays tense, because it's never quite clear where she'll go next. It allows her for more poetic expression than I remember in any of her other works--drawing a parallel, for example, between the dismemberment of Hungary and her father's change.
It is a fabulous and thought provoking exploration.