Following demands that Salman Rushdie’s novel "The Satanic Verses" be banned, the storming of the stage of the play "Behzti" meaning dishonour by British Sikh playwright Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti that turned the spotlight on her own community and protests by some Christians to the BBC’s broadcasting of "Jerry Springer – The Opera", in 2005, the UK Labour government introduced legislation aiming "to make provision about offences involving stirring up hatred against persons on racial or religious grounds". Ostensibly, the legislation was intended to prevent the incitement of violence and hatred of religious groups but the motivation appeared to be to cultivate favour from the Moslem community for the then upcoming UK general election. The book is a collection of essays in defence of freedom of speech that this legislation had the potential to curtail. Following the introduction which sets out the situation as it then stood, the first eight odd essays, including one by Rowan Atkinson who led the political opposition to the then proposed legislation, addressed the core issues of freedom of expression in light of the recent protests and then proposed legislation and when I was getting toward the end of these, it struck me that they were largely making the same argument, albeit from different perspectives. Fortunately, I persisted.
In Art and Anathema, Howard Jacobson argues that art is inherently transgressive hence religion has always been uneasy with art including humour. Julian Evans presented the case of 15th century Renaissance humanist scholar and writer Rabelais who, following the Church’s discovery that, having learned by classical Greek which had then just been rediscovered in Western Europe and studying biblical texts in Greek, scholars began to offer their own interpretations of such texts, banned the learning of Greek, learned it anyways. In due course he wrote a number of satirical books attacking the abuses of the clergy from a humanistic and Protestant perspective but with a nod to wine, games and popular culture. The essay summarises his life, at time coming close to being burned at the stake, and writing which was, of course, banned by the Church but remain relevant today. In "God Save Us from Religion!", Moris Farhi provides an insightful examination of the inherent nature of religious institutions, their codification of doctrines, their tendency authoritarianism, their perpetual proselytising of their "truths", claims to be "chosen" or both and their inherent claims of exclusivity which will lead them to eternal bliss and everyone else to eternal damnation. Stressing that the opposition to religion comes from rational thought and not just from outside, this essay is one of the best on the topic I’ve read and it’s itself worth the purchase price of the book. In Ian Buruma’s "Final Cut" reflects on the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh who was murdered in Amsterdam for making, with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the film "Submission" criticising the treatment of women by Islam. The last essay I’ll summarise is titled "Science and Islam" by Pervez Hoodbhoy, a professor of physics at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad in Pakistan in which he presents the sorry state of the teaching of science in Moslem-majority countries, noting a few exceptions.
With a few exceptions, the essays are well written, insightful and thought-provoking and it’s a book to which I’ll return.